FTIR Spectroscopy in Art Conservation: A Comprehensive Guide to Analyzing Paint Binders and Varnishes

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive examination of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy as a critical analytical tool for the characterization of organic materials in art conservation. It covers the foundational principles of FTIR for identifying natural and synthetic paint binders and varnishes, explores advanced methodological applications including portable and non-invasive techniques, addresses common troubleshooting and optimization strategies for complex samples, and validates FTIR through comparative analysis with complementary techniques like Py-GC-MS and O-PTIR. Tailored for conservation scientists, researchers, and museum professionals, this review synthesizes current methodologies to support ethical treatment, authentication, and preservation of cultural heritage objects.

Fundamental Principles of FTIR for Cultural Heritage Analysis

Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a cornerstone analytical technique in the field of art conservation and cultural heritage science. This method provides critical insights into the molecular composition of materials through the measurement of infrared light absorption by chemical bonds, creating a unique spectral "fingerprint" for each substance [1]. The relevance of FTIR spectroscopy is particularly pronounced in the analysis of complex artistic materials such as paint binders and varnishes, which form the core focus of this application note. Its non-destructive nature, minimal sample requirements, and ability to analyze both organic and inorganic components make it an indispensable tool for conservators and conservation scientists seeking to authenticate, date, and develop appropriate conservation strategies for artworks [2] [3].

Within the broader thesis context of FTIR analysis of paint binders and varnishes, this technique enables researchers to overcome significant analytical challenges. Artists' materials often consist of complex, multi-layered systems of organic binders mixed with inorganic pigments, which are further complicated by aging processes and previous restoration attempts [4]. FTIR spectroscopy provides a pathway to identify these components accurately, thereby informing decisions about conservation treatments, verifying authenticity, and understanding historical artistic techniques [5].

Core FTIR Techniques in Art Conservation

Several FTIR sampling techniques have been developed to address the diverse needs and constraints of analyzing cultural heritage objects. The choice of technique involves careful consideration of factors including non-destructiveness, spectral quality, and the physical characteristics of the artifact.

Table 1: Comparison of Primary FTIR Techniques in Art Conservation

Technique	Principle of Operation	Destructiveness	Primary Applications	Key Advantages	Key Limitations
Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR)	IR radiation travels through a crystal, creating an evanescent wave that penetrates the sample in contact with the crystal [3].	Micro-destructive (can leave marks on soft materials) [3].	Identification of binders, varnishes, synthetic polymers, and fibers [2] [3].	Minimal sample preparation; high-quality spectra directly comparable to reference libraries [2].	Requires physical contact; potentially problematic for fragile or valuable surfaces [3].
External Reflectance (ER)	IR radiation is directed at the sample surface and the reflected light is collected and analyzed [5] [3].	Non-invasive and non-contact [5] [3].	In-situ analysis of paintings, plastics, and large or fragile objects that cannot be sampled [5] [3].	Completely non-destructive; no risk of damaging sensitive surfaces [5].	Spectra often distorted (derivative-like or reststrahlen bands); require mathematical transformation (Kramers-Krönig) for interpretation [3].
Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy	Measures overtone and combination bands of fundamental molecular vibrations in the MIR region [4].	Non-invasive [4].	Analysis of paint stratigraphy and identification of organic binders (proteins, lipids) beneath surface layers [4].	Deeper penetration depth allows for subsurface analysis; spectra do not require complex processing [4].	Broader, less resolved bands; can require multivariate analysis for interpretation [4].

The following workflow outlines a decision-making process for selecting and applying these FTIR techniques in a conservation context:

FTIR Technique Selection Workflow for Conservation Analysis

Experimental Protocols for Binder and Varnish Analysis

Protocol 1: Non-Invasive Analysis Using External Reflectance FTIR

Application: This protocol is designed for the completely non-destructive analysis of paint binders and varnishes on sensitive art surfaces where sampling is not permitted [5] [3].

Materials & Equipment:

• FTIR spectrometer with external reflectance accessory
• Integrated camera for spot identification
• Gold mirror for background collection
• Vibration-isolated table (recommended)

Procedure:

• Instrument Setup: Configure the FTIR spectrometer with the external reflection accessory. Ensure the instrument is positioned on a stable surface to prevent vibrations.
• Background Acquisition: Collect a background spectrum using a gold mirror as the reference material. This compensates for instrumental and environmental factors [4].
• Sample Positioning: Place the artwork in front of the spectrometer compartment. Use the integrated camera to precisely select and focus on the area of interest (e.g., a crack in the varnish or a specific paint region) [5].
• Spectral Collection: Acquire spectra in the mid-IR (4000–400 cm⁻¹) and/or far-IR regions as needed. Far-IR is particularly useful for inorganic pigments with weak mid-IR signatures [5].
• Data Acquisition Parameters:
  • Resolution: 4 cm⁻¹
  • Scans: 200–500 accumulations to ensure adequate signal-to-noise ratio
  • Spectral Range: 7500–375 cm⁻¹ to capture both MIR and NIR regions if applicable [4]
• Spectral Processing: Apply Kramers-Krönig transformation to correct for distorted bands characteristic of ER-FTIR spectra, converting them to absorption-like formats for easier interpretation and comparison with reference libraries [3].

Protocol 2: Micro-Sample Analysis Using ATR-FTIR

Application: This protocol applies when minute samples (e.g., from existing damage or edges) are available for more definitive material identification [2] [3].

Materials & Equipment:

• FTIR spectrometer with ATR accessory (diamond crystal typically used)
• Microscope attachment (for micro-samples)
• Precision clamp or hand-held pressure device
• Cleaning solvents (ethanol, acetone) for crystal cleaning

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: If a sample is obtained, ensure it is representative of the material in question. For cross-sectional analysis, embed and polish samples in resin.
• Crystal Cleaning: Thoroughly clean the ATR crystal with appropriate solvents and verify cleanliness by collecting a background spectrum.
• Sample Placement: Place the sample directly on the diamond crystal surface. For small or fragile samples, use the microscope to precisely position the area of interest.
• Contact Optimization: Apply consistent pressure to the sample using the instrument's clamp or, alternatively, by carefully holding the object and applying pressure by hand to ensure good contact between the sample and crystal [3].
• Data Acquisition Parameters:
  • Resolution: 4 cm⁻¹
  • Scans: 32–64 accumulations
  • Spectral Range: 4000–400 cm⁻¹ [2]
• Spectral Collection: Acquire the spectrum. The penetration depth is typically limited to a few micrometers, ensuring surface-specific information [3].

Data Interpretation and Spectral Analysis

The identification of paint binders and varnishes relies on recognizing characteristic absorption bands in the infrared spectrum. The table below summarizes key spectral signatures for materials commonly encountered in art objects.

Table 2: Characteristic FTIR Absorption Bands for Artistic Materials

Material Class	Specific Material	Characteristic Absorption Bands (cm⁻¹)	Band Assignments
Proteinaceous Binders	Egg yolk, animal glue	3290-3300 (N-H stretch); 1630-1650 (Amide I); 1530-1550 (Amide II) [4]	N-H stretching and bending vibrations from proteins
Lipid/Oil Binders	Linseed oil, walnut oil	2925, 2853 (C-H stretch); 1745-1750 (C=O ester stretch); 1160-1170 (C-O ester stretch) [4]	Aliphatic CH groups and ester carbonyls from triglycerides
Natural Resins	Dammar, mastic	1700-1720 (C=O stretch); 1270, 1100 (C-O stretch) [4]	Carboxylic acids and esters
Polysaccharides	Gum arabic, starch	3200-3550 (O-H stretch); 1020-1050 (C-O-C stretch) [2]	Hydroxyl groups and glycosidic linkages
Synthetic Polymers	PVC, PMMA	1250-1330 (C-Cl for PVC); 1730 (C=O for PMMA) [3]	Polymer-specific functional groups
Cellulosic Fibers	Cotton, flax, hemp	1595 (aromatic C=C); 1105 (C-O-C); 2900 (C-H) – use intensity ratios for differentiation [2]	Lignin and cellulose content

For complex spectra, particularly those from ER-FTIR or NIR techniques, additional processing is often required:

• Kramers-Krönig Transformation: Essential for correcting phase distortions in ER-FTIR spectra, making them comparable to standard transmission or ATR spectra [3].
• Spectral Ratios: For differentiating similar materials like flax and hemp, calculate band intensity ratios (I1595/I1105 and I1595/I2900) to exploit compositional differences [2].
• Multivariate Analysis: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) can help distinguish between different binders, especially when analyzing NIR spectra where bands are broader and often overlapping [4].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Reference Materials for FTIR Analysis

Item	Function/Application	Examples/Specific Types
Reference Binders	Create spectral libraries for identification	Linseed oil, walnut oil, egg yolk, egg white, animal glue [4]
Historical Pigments	Understand pigment-binder interactions	Lead white, azurite, yellow ochre, vermilion [4]
ATR Crystals	Sample interface for ATR measurements	Diamond (durability), Germanium (high refractive index) [3]
Cleaning Solvents	Maintain instrument and crystal cleanliness	Ethanol, acetone (high purity grades)
Reference Polymers	Identify modern conservation materials	PVC, PMMA, PS, PET reference samples [3]

Case Studies and Applications

Analysis of Historical Paintings

FT-NIR spectroscopy has been successfully applied to investigate six Renaissance paintings from Lombardy, Italy, representing the transition period from tempera to oil painting techniques. The deeper penetration of NIR radiation enabled researchers to identify binders and study the complex stratigraphy of these works without sampling [4]. The analysis distinguished between lipid-based binders (drying oils) and proteinaceous binders (egg tempera) based on their characteristic N absorption bands, providing crucial art historical insights into the evolution of painting techniques.

Survey of Modern Art Collections

A comprehensive material survey of modern and contemporary art collections at the Slovak National Gallery employed both ATR and ER-FTIR to analyze 58 objects. The study successfully identified synthetic polymers including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in artworks [3]. This research highlights the necessity of a multi-technique approach, as 16 of the 58 objects could only be analyzed non-invasively using ER-FTIR due to their size, fragility, or surface characteristics.

FTIR spectroscopy provides an indispensable analytical toolkit for the study of paint binders and varnishes in art conservation research. The technique's versatility, through various sampling modes including ATR, external reflectance, and NIR spectroscopy, allows conservators and scientists to address a wide range of analytical challenges while respecting the integrity of cultural heritage objects. As demonstrated through the protocols and case studies presented herein, the appropriate selection and application of FTIR methodologies can yield critical information about material composition, artistic techniques, and degradation processes. This information forms a scientific foundation for informed conservation decisions, authentication studies, and art historical research, ultimately contributing to the preservation of our cultural heritage for future generations.

Within art conservation research, the precise molecular identification of natural resins—dammar, mastic, and copal—is a critical procedure for authenticating, conserving, and preserving cultural heritage objects. These resins have been historically employed as paint binders and varnishes, and understanding their chemical composition and aging behavior is essential for developing appropriate conservation strategies. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a cornerstone technique in this analytical process, valued for its inherent sensitivity, specificity, and non-destructive capabilities [6]. This application note, framed within a broader thesis on FTIR analysis of paint binders and varnishes, details the protocols and data interpretation strategies for distinguishing these three resins based on their unique molecular fingerprints. The ability to classify these materials accurately supports efforts to conserve, restore, and validate the authenticity of rare and valuable artifacts, from fine art paintings to historical furniture [6] [7].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The following table catalogs the key materials and reagents essential for the FTIR-based analysis of natural resins in an art conservation context.

Table 1: Key Research Reagents and Materials for FTIR Analysis of Natural Resins

Item Name	Function/Explanation
Reference Resins	High-purity samples of dammar, mastic, and copal are essential for building a spectral library and calibrating the instrument. Variability due to supplier and geographical origin should be considered [7].
Potassium Bromide (KBr)	Highly pure, dry KBr is used for preparing transparent pellets for transmission FTIR analysis, allowing for the direct examination of crushed resin samples [7].
Deuterated Triglycine Sulfate (DTGS) Detector	A standard, robust detector suitable for laboratory-based FTIR analysis of resin samples.
Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride (MCT) Detector	A cryogenically cooled detector offering higher sensitivity, often used in FTIR microspectroscopy for analyzing very small samples from art objects [7].
Polar Solvents (e.g., Ethanol)	Used for preparing reference varnish films by casting solutions onto clean substrates like aluminum plates, simulating historical application techniques for aging studies [7].
Handheld FTIR Analyzer	Portable instruments (e.g., Agilent 4100 ExoScan) enable non-destructive, in-situ analysis of priceless artifacts too large or fragile to move to a laboratory, such as mural paintings or historical doors [6].
ATR-FarIR Accessory	Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) accessories for the far-infrared region (< 400 cm⁻¹) provide an alternative method for characterizing resins, potentially offering enhanced discrimination between categories like triterpenoid (dammar) and diterpenoid resins [8].

Spectral Signatures: Key FTIR Absorbance Bands for Identification

The identification of natural resins via FTIR spectroscopy relies on interpreting the characteristic vibrational bands of their functional groups. The following table summarizes the defining spectral features of dammar, mastic, and copal, which are primarily distinguished by their carbonyl (C=O) and exocyclic methylene (C=CH₂) stretching vibrations [7].

Table 2: Characteristic FTIR Absorption Bands for Dammar, Mastic, and Copal Resins

Resin Type & Chemical Class	Key Absorption Bands (cm⁻¹) and Assignments
Dammar (Triterpenoid)	• Carbonyl Stretch: ~1705 cm⁻¹ (carboxylic acids) [8].• Exocyclic Methylene Stretches: ~3075 cm⁻¹ (w), ~1645 cm⁻¹ (m), and ~887 cm⁻¹ (m). These are key markers for triterpenoid resins like dammar [7].
Mastic (Triterpenoid)	• Carbonyl Stretch: ~1700 cm⁻¹ (carboxylic acids) [7].• Exocyclic Methylene Stretches: ~3075 cm⁻¹ (w), ~1640 cm⁻¹ (m), and ~885 cm⁻¹ (m). Spectrally very similar to dammar, often requiring careful comparison of relative band intensities [7].
Copal (Diterpenoid with Polymerized Components)	• Carbonyl Stretch: ~1690 cm⁻¹ (carboxylic acids, communic acids) [9] [7]. This band is reported at ~1643 cm⁻¹ in some Congolese copals [9].• Exocyclic Methylene Stretches: ~3075 cm⁻¹ (w), ~1645 cm⁻¹ (w), and ~890 cm⁻¹ (w). These bands are generally weaker than in triterpenoid resins [7].• Distinction from Amber: A band at 1643 cm⁻¹ is attributed to communic acids in copal, whereas amber shows a dominant band at 1735 cm⁻¹ associated with ester groups, indicating advanced fossilization and oxidation [9].

Experimental Protocols for FTIR Analysis

Sample Preparation Methods

The choice of sample preparation is dictated by the nature of the art object and the required analytical precision.

• Protocol 1: KBr Pellet Method for Micro-samples

  • Application: Ideal for analyzing tiny, cross-sectional samples or scrapings (as little as 30 µg) taken from furniture or paintings [7].
  • Procedure:
    • Gently crush a minute sample of the resin.
    • In a dry environment (e.g., a glove bag under nitrogen purge), mix approximately 30 µg of the sample with 150 mg of dry, spectroscopic-grade KBr.
    • Press the mixture under high pressure to form a clear 1.5 mm micropellet.
    • Mount the pellet in a beam condenser for FTIR analysis.
  • Rationale: This method minimizes water absorption and sample reaction, ensuring high-quality spectra from minimal material [7].

• Protocol 2: Non-Invasive Analysis Using Handheld FTIR

  • Application: For direct analysis of large, immovable, or extremely valuable objects where sampling is prohibited, such as cave art, historical murals, or temple doors [6].
  • Procedure:
    • Transport the handheld FTIR analyzer (e.g., Agilent 4100 ExoScan) to the object's location.
    • Using a diffuse reflectance or contact ATR accessory, gently place the measurement probe onto the surface of the artifact.
    • Acquire spectra from multiple areas of interest to assess homogeneity and identify different chemical components (e.g., oxalates, carbonates, resins).
  • Rationale: This truly non-destructive approach allows for the chemical mapping of an object without any alteration, making it ideal for continuous monitoring of restoration processes [6].

• Protocol 3: Preparation of Reference Varnish Films for Aging Studies

  • Application: To create standardized reference samples for studying the chemical changes in resins upon artificial or natural aging.
  • Procedure:
    • Prepare a 5 wt/v% solution of the reference resin (e.g., mastic, copal) in an appropriate solvent like ethanol [7].
    • Filter the solution through cheesecloth to remove particulates.
    • Cast the solution onto clean, inert substrates (e.g., aluminum plates) using a Teflon mold.
    • Allow the film to air-dry in a fume hood for approximately one week.
  • Rationale: These simulated varnish films can then be subjected to accelerated aging in a Weather-Ometer to study degradation pathways, such as the increase in carbonyl bands upon oxidation [7].

Instrumental Parameters and Data Analysis

• Instrumentation: Use an FTIR spectrometer equipped with an MCT detector for highest sensitivity, especially for micro-samples. Purge the instrument with dry, CO₂-free air to minimize spectral interference from water vapor and carbon dioxide [7].
• Data Acquisition: Collect spectra over a range of 4000–500 cm⁻¹. Each spectrum should be the sum of 200 scans collected at a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ to ensure a high signal-to-noise ratio [7].
• Spectral Deconvolution and Subtraction: For complex mixtures often found in historical finishes, use computer-assisted deconvolution to resolve overlapping bands and spectral subtraction to isolate the spectrum of individual components from the mixture spectrum [7].
• Multivariate Discriminant Analysis: For advanced classification, employ machine learning techniques such as Partial Least Squares Regression combined with Linear Discriminant Analysis (PLSR-LDA). This hybrid approach can extract latent variables from the spectral data to classify samples and identify critical wavenumbers associated with aging or resin type, even in complex systems like bituminous mastics, a principle transferable to art conservation [10] [11].

Figure 1: FTIR Analysis Workflow for Natural Resins in Art Conservation. This diagram outlines the two primary pathways (in-lab and on-site) for the molecular identification of resins from cultural heritage objects.

FTIR spectroscopy, supported by the detailed protocols and reference data provided in this document, is an indispensable tool for the molecular identification of dammar, mastic, and copal resins in art conservation. The ability to perform both highly sensitive laboratory analysis and truly non-destructive field measurements makes it uniquely suited to the demands of preserving cultural heritage. By applying the structured methodologies herein—from sample preparation to advanced data analysis—researchers and conservators can confidently classify these resins, assess their aging states, and make informed decisions that ensure the long-term preservation of priceless art and historical objects.

Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy stands as a cornerstone technique in art conservation research for the molecular identification of paint binders, crucial for authentication, conservation treatment, and understanding artistic techniques [6]. The analysis of binding media—primarily oils (lipids), proteins, and gums (polysaccharides like gum Arabic)—presents a significant challenge due to the complex, aged, and often mixed nature of materials in cultural heritage objects [12]. FTIR spectroscopy addresses this by providing a sensitive and specific method to characterize these organic materials based on their functional groups and molecular vibrations [13]. The ongoing evolution of FTIR techniques, from traditional transmission methods to advanced non-invasive reflectance and imaging modes, has progressively minimized the need for sampling, allowing for more ethical and comprehensive analysis of priceless artworks [6] [14] [15]. This application note details the protocols and data interpretation strategies for characterizing these three primary binder classes within a research framework focused on art conservation.

Principles of FTIR Analysis for Paint Binders

The identification of paint binders via FTIR spectroscopy relies on detecting characteristic absorption bands associated with the major functional groups in each binder class. Table 1 summarizes the key infrared spectral signatures that serve as diagnostic markers for oils, proteins, and gum Arabic.

Table 1: Characteristic FTIR Spectral Bands for Primary Paint Binders

Binder Class	Specific Example	Key Spectral Bands (cm⁻¹) and Assignments
Oil (Lipid)	Linseed Oil	~1730 (C=O stretch, ester), ~1160-1100 (C-O stretch, ester), ~2925 & ~2855 (C-H stretch, CH₂) [16] [15]
Protein	Egg Yolk, Egg White	~1650 (Amide I, C=O stretch), ~1550 (Amide II, N-H bend/C-N stretch), ~3300 (N-H stretch) [14]
Polysaccharide	Gum Arabic	~1600-1650 & ~1420 (C=O stretch, carboxylate), ~1020-1080 (C-O-C/C-O stretch), ~3350 (O-H stretch) [14]

The successful application of these spectral markers can be hindered by several factors. The presence of inorganic pigments can obscure organic binder signals; for instance, carbonate pigments like azurite and lead white significantly interfere with the correct identification of the paint medium [14]. Furthermore, the choice of FTIR sampling mode directly influences the spectral appearance. External Reflection (ER) spectra often exhibit derivative-like band shapes and Reststrahlen effects (inverted bands) due to the contribution of specular reflection, particularly from smooth surfaces and inorganic compounds [14] [17]. In contrast, Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) and transmission modes typically produce spectra that are more straightforward to interpret, resembling conventional absorption spectra [13] [17].

Experimental Protocols

Non-Invasive Analysis Using Portable FTIR in External Reflectance Mode

The analysis of binders directly on an artwork requires a non-contact, non-invasive approach. This protocol utilizes a portable FTIR spectrometer equipped with an external reflectance accessory [14] [15].

Materials & Equipment:

• Portable FTIR spectrometer (e.g., Bruker Alpha, Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50)
• External Reflection (ER) module accessory (e.g., ConservatIR)
• Software for spectral collection and Kramers-Kronig Transformation (KKT)

Procedure:

• Instrument Setup: Configure the portable FTIR spectrometer with the ER module. Set the spectral range to 4000–400 cm⁻¹ and a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ [14] [15].
• Background Measurement: Collect a background spectrum from a calibrated gold reference or another suitable non-absorbing surface.
• Sample Positioning: Place the artwork so the area of interest is approximately 1-2 mm from the sampling aperture of the ER accessory. Use the integrated camera, if available, to ensure precise positioning and a clear focus [15].
• Spectral Acquisition: Collect the sample spectrum with a minimum of 32-64 co-added scans to achieve an adequate signal-to-noise ratio [14].
• Spectral Processing: Apply the Kramers-Kronig Transformation (KKT) to the raw reflectance spectrum to correct for derivative-like band shapes and Reststrahlen effects, converting it into a more conventional absorption-like spectrum for easier interpretation and library matching [15].

Micro-Invasive Analysis Using ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy

When minute samples can be taken, ATR-FTIR provides high-quality spectra with minimal sample preparation. This is considered a micro-invasive but non-destructive technique as the sample remains intact [13] [18].

Materials & Equipment:

• FTIR spectrometer with ATR accessory (diamond crystal is typical)
• Pressure clamp or manual press
• Fine tweezers and microscope (if using micro-ATR)
• Isopropanol and lint-free wipes for cleaning

Procedure:

• Crystal Cleaning: Clean the ATR crystal thoroughly with isopropanol and perform a cleanness check by collecting a background spectrum and comparing it to a clean reference [18].
• Background Measurement: Collect a new background spectrum with the clean crystal.
• Sample Placement: If the sample is a free-floating fragment, place it directly onto the ATR crystal. For fragments on a substrate, position the area of interest over the crystal.
• Ensuring Contact: Apply firm, stable pressure using the instrument's pressure clamp or by pressing manually to ensure intimate contact between the sample and the crystal. This step is critical for obtaining a high-quality spectrum [18].
• Spectral Acquisition: Collect the spectrum with 32-64 scans at 4 cm⁻¹ resolution [16] [18].
• ATR Correction: If comparing against transmission spectral libraries, apply an ATR correction algorithm within the instrument software to account for wavelength-dependent penetration depth [15].

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Binder Identification and Workflow

The process of identifying an unknown binder involves a systematic comparison of the acquired spectrum against reference data and known spectral markers. The following workflow outlines the key decision points.

Quantitative Analysis with Multivariate Methods

For complex mixtures, quantitative analysis can be achieved by coupling ATR-FTIR with chemometrics. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression allows for the quantification of components in multi-binder mixtures.

Protocol for PLS Quantitative Analysis [16]:

• Prepare Calibration Set: Create a series of known binder mixtures (e.g., binary or ternary mixtures of linseed oil, egg, and gum Arabic) covering a range of concentration ratios.
• Acquire Spectra: Analyze all calibration standards using ATR-FTIR under consistent parameters (resolution, scans).
• Develop PLS Model: Use chemometric software to build a PLS regression model correlating the spectral data of the calibration set with the known concentrations.
• Validate Model: Validate the model using an independent set of validation samples to determine its accuracy and robustness.
• Analyze Unknown: Apply the validated PLS model to the spectrum of the unknown sample to predict the concentration of its components.

Table 2: Example Performance of ATR-FTIR with PLS for Quantifying Paint Components

Mixture Type	Number of Components	Typical Uncertainty (g/100 g)	Key Binders Quantified
Binding Media [16]	Binary/Ternary	< 3.0	Linseed oil, walnut oil, animal glue
Pigment-Binder [16]	Binary	< 2.5	Lead white, chalk, linseed oil
Alkyd Resins [16]	Polymer	Varies	Pentaalkyd, phthalic anhydride

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for FTIR Binder Analysis

Item	Function/Application in Analysis
Gum Arabic	Reference polysaccharide binder; historically used in watercolors and manuscripts [19] [14].
Egg Glair (White) & Yolk	Reference proteinaceous binders; used in tempera painting and illuminations [14].
Linseed Oil	Reference lipid/oil binder; a common drying oil in oil paintings [16].
Historical Pigments	(e.g., Azurite, Vermilion, Lead White) For creating mock-up paints to study pigment-binder interactions [14] [20].
ATR-FTIR Spectrometer	Primary instrument for micro-invasive analysis; diamond ATR crystal is standard [16] [18].
Portable FTIR with ER Module	Enables non-invasive, in-situ analysis of large or immovable artworks [6] [15].
Kramers-Kronig Transformation (KKT)	Essential algorithm for correcting distorted spectral features in External Reflectance FTIR data [15].
Spectral Database (e.g., IRUG)	Reference libraries for comparing and identifying unknown spectra from art objects [18].

FTIR spectroscopy remains an indispensable and evolving tool for the discrimination and analysis of paint binders in cultural heritage research. The ability to distinguish between oil, protein, and gum Arabic binders, whether through non-invasive reflectance techniques or high-resolution micro-invasive ATR analysis, provides critical insights for conservation and art history. The integration of multivariate statistical methods like PLS regression further enhances the capability to deconvolute complex mixtures, adding a quantitative dimension to binder studies. As spectral databases expand and portable instrument technology advances, FTIR spectroscopy will continue to be a fundamental technique for the non-destructive and ethical study of our artistic heritage.

Advanced FTIR Methodologies and Practical Applications in Museum Settings

Portable and Handheld FTIR Systems for In-Situ Non-Invasive Analysis

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has long been a cornerstone technique for the analysis of cultural heritage objects, valued for its sensitivity, specificity, and non-destructive capabilities [6]. The advent of portable and handheld FTIR systems has revolutionized the field by enabling in-situ analysis of priceless artworks that cannot be transported to laboratories or sampled destructively. These systems facilitate the direct identification of paint binders and varnishes on site, whether in museums, historical buildings, or archaeological sites, providing crucial data for authentication, conservation treatment, and historical research [6] [5].

For research focused specifically on FTIR analysis of paint binders and varnishes, portable systems offer particular advantages. They allow conservators to characterize the molecular composition of binding media and surface coatings across multiple areas of an artwork without contact or damage, revealing spatial distribution of materials and condition assessments that inform appropriate conservation strategies [6].

Modern handheld FTIR instruments bring laboratory-grade performance to field-based analysis, maintaining the sensitivity and flexibility of traditional benchtop systems while offering unprecedented portability [21]. Key systems such as the Agilent 4100 ExoScan, 4200 FlexScan, and 4300 Handheld FTIR are specifically engineered for non-destructive testing in non-laboratory environments [6] [21].

These systems support various sampling interfaces that can be changed without instrument realignment, enabling analysis of diverse surfaces from airplane wings to fine art paintings [21]. The critical technological advancement for art conservation applications is the implementation of external reflection (ER-FTIR) and diffuse reflectance measurement modes, which provide completely non-contact analysis capabilities [5] [14]. Unlike attenuated total reflection (ATR) or transmission techniques that require physical contact or sample removal, external reflection allows the artwork to be placed a short distance (approximately 1 mm) from the spectrometer, eliminating any risk of damage to fragile surfaces [5] [14].

Application in Paint Binder and Varnish Analysis

Key Analytical Capabilities

Portable FTIR systems provide several critical functions for the analysis of paint binders and varnishes in art conservation research:

• Binder Identification: Discrimination between different classes of binding media including proteins (egg yolk, egg white), polysaccharides (gum Arabic), and lipids (oil) based on their characteristic infrared spectral features [14]. Key spectral regions include the amide I (≈1693-1662 cm⁻¹) and amide II (≈1547-1555 cm⁻¹) bands for proteins, and hydroxyl group vibrations (≈3320 cm⁻¹) for polysaccharides [14].

• Varnish Characterization: Identification of natural and synthetic resins used in protective coatings, and assessment of their degradation state through monitoring of carbonyl band shifts and other molecular changes [6].

• Degradation Monitoring: Detection of oxidative products, hydrolysis, and other chemical changes in binding media and varnishes resulting from environmental exposure or aging processes [6].

• Pigment-Binder Interactions: Analysis of how different pigments affect the spectral features of binding media, which is crucial for accurate interpretation of FTIR data from actual artworks [14].

Practical Application Examples

Analysis of Historical Temple Doors: The Agilent 4100 ExoScan FTIR system with diffuse reflectance accessory was used to investigate the painted doors of the Beigans Chao-Tian temple in Taiwan without sampling [6]. Infrared spectra revealed different concentrations of oxalates (degradation products from microbial activity) in various colored regions, with blackened areas showing significantly higher levels. The analysis also identified the major paint components including calcium carbonate, talc, kaulin clay, and cellulose across multiple spots, providing a comprehensive understanding of the paint composition and degradation state without altering the artifact [6].

Outdoor Mural Conservation: Researchers are using handheld FTIR to monitor the degradation of outdoor murals, such as the "Dr. J." mural in Philadelphia [6]. The system tracks chemical changes in protective coatings by following shifts in the carbonyl band (≈1700 cm⁻¹) of methacrylate-based polymers, helping determine optimal recoating schedules before irreversible damage occurs [6].

Illuminated Manuscripts Analysis: Non-invasive ER-FTIR has successfully identified binding media in medieval and Renaissance illuminated manuscripts, discriminating between gum Arabic and egg-based binders despite the complex spectral interferences from parchment supports and pigments [14].

Experimental Protocols for In-Situ Analysis

Protocol 1: Non-Invasive Analysis of Paint Binders on Artworks

This protocol describes the procedure for identifying paint binders on easel paintings, murals, or other art objects using handheld FTIR with external reflection mode.

Table 1: Research Reagent Solutions for FTIR Analysis of Paint Binders

Material/Reagent	Function in Analysis	Application Notes
Handheld FTIR with ER Accessory	Non-contact spectral acquisition	Maintain ≈1 mm distance from surface; Agilent 4100/4300 or similar systems
Spectral Database	Reference for binder identification	Custom database of pure binders (egg tempera, linseed oil, gum Arabic)
Calibration Standards	Instrument verification	Polystyrene or other certified standards for wavelength calibration
Portable Positioning Stage	Stable artwork/instrument alignment	Essential for minimizing movement during measurement

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Instrument Preparation: Power up the handheld FTIR system and allow it to warm up according to manufacturer specifications. Select external reflection mode and configure the software for the appropriate spectral range (typically 4000-400 cm⁻¹ with 4 cm⁻¹ resolution) [14].

• System Calibration: Verify instrument performance using a calibration standard, ensuring wavelength accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio meet specifications for the analysis requirements.

• Artwork Examination: Visually inspect the artwork under appropriate lighting to identify areas for analysis. Select spots that are representative of different colors or conditions, avoiding cracks, losses, or heavily soiled areas that might compromise spectral quality.

• Positioning and Alignment: Using the integrated camera system available on many handheld units (e.g., ConservatIR accessory), position the instrument approximately 1 mm from the surface and focus on the area of interest [5]. Ensure stable positioning to prevent contact with the artwork.

• Spectral Acquisition: Collect spectra with sufficient scans (typically 40-64 scans) to achieve adequate signal-to-noise ratio while minimizing acquisition time [14]. Save spectra with appropriate naming conventions that document the artwork and specific location.

• Spectral Interpretation: Compare acquired spectra to reference databases of pure binders, noting that ER-FTIR spectra may exhibit derivative-like band shapes and reststrahlen effects (band inversion) particularly with inorganic pigments [14]. Focus on key diagnostic regions:

  • Proteins: Amide I (≈1693-1662 cm⁻¹) and Amide II (≈1547-1555 cm⁻¹)
  • Polysaccharides: Hydroxyl bending (≈1604 cm⁻¹) and glycosidic bond vibrations (≈1020 cm⁻¹)
  • Oils: Ester carbonyl stretch (≈1740 cm⁻¹) and associated oxidation products [14]

Protocol 2: Monitoring Varnish Degradation on Historical Objects

This protocol describes the procedure for assessing the condition of natural and synthetic varnishes on artworks using portable FTIR systems.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Baseline Establishment: If possible, establish a baseline measurement on an unvarnished or minimally degraded area of the object for comparison with varnished regions.

• Spectral Acquisition: Collect spectra from multiple locations across the varnished surface using the non-contact external reflection mode. Ensure consistent measurement geometry across all sampled areas.

• Degradation Assessment: Monitor specific spectral indicators of varnish degradation:

  • Carbonyl Band Monitoring: Track position and shape changes in the carbonyl stretch region (≈1740-1680 cm⁻¹) which shifts with oxidation [6]
  • Hydroxyl Band Development: Note increased hydroxyl absorption (≈3400 cm⁻¹) indicating oxidation products
  • Ester Bond Reduction: Decreased intensity at ≈1160 cm⁻¹ suggesting cleavage of ester linkages

• Mapping Distribution: For advanced systems with mapping capabilities, create chemical images showing the spatial distribution of degradation products across the surface.

• Treatment Evaluation: Compare pre- and post-treatment spectra to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning or other conservation interventions.

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Quantitative Spectral Analysis

Table 2: Characteristic FTIR Absorption Bands for Paint Binders and Related Materials

Material Type	Key Absorption Bands (cm⁻¹)	Band Assignment	Diagnostic Significance
Protein Binders	1693-1662 (Amide I) 1547-1555 (Amide II) 3290 (N-H stretch)	C=O stretch C-N stretch + N-H bend N-H stretching	Indicator of egg, casein, or animal glue binders
Polysaccharide Binders	3320 (O-H stretch) 1604 (O-H bend) 1020 (C-O stretch)	Hydroxyl stretching Hydroxyl bending Glycosidic bond vibration	Characteristic of gum Arabic, starches, plant gums
Oil Binders	1740 (C=O stretch) 1160 (C-O stretch) 2920, 2850 (C-H stretch)	Ester carbonyl Ester C-O Aliphatic C-H	Drying oil identification, oxidation monitoring
Varnish Resins	1700-1690 (C=O stretch) 1240 (C-O stretch) 1450, 1380 (C-H bend)	Carboxylic acid Acyl-O stretch Methyl bending	Natural resin identification, degradation assessment

The complexity of ER-FTIR spectra requires specialized interpretation approaches distinct from traditional transmission or ATR-FTIR. Key considerations include:

• Spectral Distortions: ER-FTIR spectra often display derivative-like band shapes and reststrahlen effects (band inversion) due to the combination of specular and volume reflection components [14]. These effects are particularly pronounced with smooth surfaces and inorganic pigments.

• Pigment Interference: Certain pigments, especially carbonates like azurite and lead white, significantly alter spectral features and can hinder binder identification [14]. Understanding these matrix effects is essential for accurate interpretation.

• Multivariate Analysis: For complex spectra, employ chemometric approaches such as principal component analysis (PCA) or non-negative least squares (NNLS) algorithms to extract meaningful information about binder composition [22].

Advantages and Limitations

Benefits of Portable FTIR Systems

The implementation of portable FTIR systems for in-situ analysis of paint binders and varnishes offers significant advantages:

• Non-Destructive Analysis: Complete elimination of sampling requirements preserves the integrity of valuable artworks [6] [5]
• In-Situ Capability: Analysis can be performed at the object's location, whether in museums, historical sites, or field locations [6]
• Rapid Multi-Point Analysis: Multiple areas can be analyzed quickly, providing comprehensive spatial information about material distribution [6]
• Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous assessment of conservation treatments or degradation processes over time [6]

Current Limitations and Considerations

Despite these advantages, several limitations must be considered:

• Spectral Complexity: ER-FTIR spectra are more complex than traditional FTIR spectra, requiring specialized expertise for accurate interpretation [14]
• Pigment Interference: Certain pigments, particularly carbonates, can dominate spectra and obscure binder signals [14]
• Surface Roughness Effects: Variations in surface topography can affect spectral quality and reproducibility
• Limited Penetration Depth: Primarily analyzes surface and near-surface regions, which may not represent bulk material composition

Portable and handheld FTIR systems represent a transformative technology for the non-invasive analysis of paint binders and varnishes in art conservation research. By enabling in-situ, non-destructive characterization of binding media and their degradation products, these instruments provide essential data for authentication, condition assessment, and treatment planning without compromising the integrity of cultural heritage objects. While spectral interpretation challenges remain, particularly with complex pigment-binder systems, ongoing advancements in instrumentation and data processing continue to enhance the capabilities of this powerful analytical approach. The integration of portable FTIR analysis into conservation practice marks a significant step forward in the scientific study and preservation of our cultural heritage.

Diffuse Reflectance (DRIFTS) and ATR-FTIR Techniques for Surface Analysis

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a cornerstone analytical technique in the field of art conservation research, providing molecular identification of organic and inorganic materials. For the analysis of delicate and irreplaceable artworks, two reflection-based FTIR techniques are paramount: Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR)-FTIR. Their non-invasive and micro-destructive nature makes them exceptionally suitable for characterizing paint binders and varnishes directly on artwork surfaces or from micro-samples, aligning with the ethical imperative to minimize intervention. This application note details the protocols, applications, and comparative advantages of these techniques within a research framework focused on the analysis of binding media and protective coatings in cultural heritage.

Theoretical Background and Technical Comparison

Principles of DRIFTS

DRIFTS is a technique where infrared radiation is directed onto a powdered or rough surface, and the resulting diffusely scattered light is collected. The measured signal comprises both volume reflection (light that has penetrated and been absorbed by the sample) and surface reflection (light reflected directly from the surface). This can sometimes lead to spectral distortions, such as Reststrahlen bands, which appear as derivative-like or inverted peaks for strong absorbers [23]. DRIFTS is particularly effective for analyzing powdered samples and is well-suited for in-situ analysis of artwork surfaces using portable instruments [24] [25].

Principles of ATR-FTIR

ATR-FTIR operates by passing infrared light through a crystal with a high refractive index (the Internal Reflection Element, or IRE) that is in intimate contact with the sample. The light undergoes total internal reflection, generating an evanescent wave that extends beyond the crystal surface and is absorbed by the sample. The depth of penetration (dp) of this evanescent wave is typically between 0.2 and 5 µm and is dependent on the wavelength, the refractive indices of the crystal and sample, and the angle of incidence [13]. This shallow probing depth makes ATR-FTIR an excellent technique for surface analysis with minimal to no sample preparation.

Comparative Techniques Table

The following table summarizes the key characteristics of DRIFTS and ATR-FTIR in the context of art conservation.

Table 1: Comparison of DRIFTS and ATR-FTIR Techniques for Conservation Science

Feature	DRIFTS	ATR-FTIR
Fundamental Principle	Measurement of diffusely scattered infrared light from a surface [25].	Measurement of the attenuation of an evanescent wave by a sample in contact with an IRE [13].
Typical Sample Form	Powders, rough surfaces, painting mock-ups [26] [25].	Solids, liquids, films, cross-sections (with imaging) [13] [18].
Sample Preparation	Minimal; often requires powdering for high-quality spectra, but can be used in non-contact mode on surfaces [25].	Minimal; requires firm, uniform contact with the ATR crystal.
Spectral Quality	Can exhibit Reststrahlen bands and other distortions; may require mathematical correction (Kramers-Kronig, Kubelka-Munk) [23].	Spectra are generally comparable to transmission libraries; minor shifts possible due to anomalous dispersion [13].
Information Depth	Varies with scattering and absorption; can probe deeper into weakly absorbing materials [23].	Shallow and well-defined (~dp, typically 0.2-5 µm) [13].
Spatial Resolution	Lower for non-microscopy setups.	High, especially with micro-ATR objectives (~100 µm spot size) [13].
Primary Conservation Applications	In-situ identification of varnishes on paintings [24]; analysis of historical pigments and dyes in mock-ups [26].	Identification of polymers in 3D objects [18]; analysis of varnishes [27], binders, and cross-sections [13].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Non-Invasive In-Situ Analysis of a Varnish Layer Using Portable DRIFTS

This protocol is adapted from a study on Edvard Munch paintings and is ideal for screening large collection objects without sampling [24].

1. Preparation and Initial Examination

• Instrument: Set up a portable FTIR spectrometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance module.
• Object Examination: Prior to analysis, examine the painting surface using stereomicroscopy and multispectral imaging (e.g., UV-induced fluorescence, raking light) to map varnish distribution and select representative areas for analysis [24].
• Reference Materials: Acquire DRIFT spectra from known, dry reference varnishes (e.g., dammar, mastic, Laropal K 80, MS2A) to create a custom spectral library [24].

2. Data Collection

• Position the spectrometer head perpendicular to the painting surface at the selected spot.
• Collect the background spectrum from a calibrated background reference (e.g., gold standard) immediately before sample measurement.
• Acquire the DRIFTS spectrum from the artwork. Typical parameters may include: 64 co-added scans, 4 cm⁻¹ spectral resolution, over a range of 4000–650 cm⁻¹ [24].
• Perform spot measurements on multiple areas, including varnished and unvarnished (if available) regions, to account for heterogeneity.

3. Data Analysis

• Visually compare the acquired in-situ spectra with the reference varnish library.
• Use correlation algorithms or hit quality indices provided by the instrument software to confirm chemical identity.
• Complement the DRIFTS findings with other non-invasive techniques, such as portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF), to contextualize the results [24].

Protocol 2: Micro-Destructive Analysis of a Paint Binder Using ATR-FTIR

This protocol is for analyzing a micro-sample removed from an artwork, allowing for high-quality, laboratory-based identification of binding media.

1. Sample Collection and Preparation

• Instrument: Use an FTIR spectrometer coupled with a micro-ATR accessory (typically a diamond crystal).
• Sampling: Under a microscope, remove a microscopic paint sample (ideally <100 µg) from a damaged or discreet area using a scalpel.
• Mounting: Place the sample on a stable surface. For a cross-sectional analysis, the sample may be embedded in a resin and polished.

2. Data Collection

• Bring the ATR crystal into firm, uniform contact with the sample using the instrument's clamping mechanism. For fragile objects, manual pressure may be applied, though this can reduce spectral quality [18].
• Collect a background spectrum with the crystal clear and in contact.
• Acquire the sample spectrum. Typical parameters: 32-64 scans, 4 cm⁻¹ resolution, 4000–600 cm⁻¹ range [18].
• For heterogeneous samples, collect multiple spectra from different particles within the sample.

3. Data Analysis

• The instrument software will typically present the spectrum in absorbance-like units.
• Compare the sample spectrum against commercial and in-house spectral libraries (e.g., IRUG) for binder identification (e.g., linseed oil, egg glair, gum Arabic, animal glue).
• Focus on key biomarker absorption bands: C=O stretch (~1740 cm⁻¹ for oils), Amide I and II (~1650 and 1550 cm⁻¹ for proteins), and broad O-H stretches for gums [26] [17].

Workflow Diagram for Technique Selection

The following diagram outlines the decision-making process for selecting and applying these techniques in a conservation research context.

Diagram 1: FTIR Technique Selection Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents and Materials

The following table lists essential materials and their functions for research involving FTIR analysis of paint binders and varnishes.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions and Materials

Reagent/Material	Function/Application in Research
Kremer Pigmente Reference Materials	Source of historically accurate pigments, dyes, and gums (e.g., gum Arabic) for creating spectral databases and painting mock-ups [26].
Traditional Binders (Egg Glair, Rabbit Glue)	Proteinaceous binders used to create historically representative paint reconstructions (mock-ups) for reference spectra [26] [25].
Historical Varnish References (Dammar, Mastic, Colophony)	Known natural and synthetic resins (e.g., Laropal K80) used to build spectral libraries for the non-invasive identification of varnish coatings on paintings [24] [27].
Internal Reflection Elements (IREs)	Diamond, Germanium, or ZnSe crystals used in ATR-FTIR. Diamond is most common for its durability and wide spectral range [13] [18].
ResinKit / In-House Polymer References	A collection of known plastic and polymer samples, crucial for verifying the identity of synthetic materials found in modern art and conservation history [18].

Advanced Applications and Data Interpretation

Data Fusion and Multivariate Analysis

Both DRIFTS and ATR-FTIR data can be integrated with other analytical techniques and subjected to advanced statistical analysis to extract more nuanced information.

• Combining HSI and DRIFTS: One study created a comprehensive database by combining DRIFTS in the mid-infrared region with Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) in the visible-near infrared and short-wave infrared. This data fusion allows for pigment and dye identification through techniques ranging from direct spectral comparison to machine learning and spectral unmixing [26].
• Principal Component Analysis (PCA): PCA can be applied to spectral data to discriminate between different sample compositions. Research has demonstrated that PCA performed on DRIFTS spectral data showed better ability to discriminate replica samples of blue tempera paints compared to PCA applied to transmission FTIR data [25].

ATR-FTIR Spectroscopic Imaging

ATR-FTIR can be coupled with an array detector to perform spectroscopic imaging. This provides both spatial and chemical information simultaneously, generating 2D chemical maps of a sample area. This is particularly powerful for analyzing cross-sections of paint layers, as it can visualize the distribution of different organic components (e.g., binder, varnish, degradation products) within the stratigraphy [13].

DRIFTS and ATR-FTIR are powerful, complementary techniques that form the backbone of modern, scientifically rigorous analysis of organic materials in art conservation. DRIFTS offers a path for non-invasive, in-situ screening of collections, while ATR-FTIR provides high-specificity identification from micro-samples with minimal destruction. The continued development of comprehensive spectral databases, combined with advanced data analysis methods like PCA and chemical imaging, will further empower conservators and scientists to uncover the material history of artworks and devise optimal strategies for their long-term preservation.

The collection of 57 paintings by Edvard Munch at the National Museum of Art in Norway represents a significant cultural heritage, yet it carries a complex and controversial conservation history. Between 1909 and 1993, the museum applied natural and synthetic varnish coatings to 48 of these paintings, directly contradicting Munch's documented preference for unvarnished or occasionally locally varnished surfaces [24]. This practice sparked ongoing public and professional debate, creating a "varnish controversy" concerning the artist's original intent versus museum preservation practices [24] [28]. Munch typically favored matte, "fresco-like" finishes, occasionally using local glazes or varnishes to saturate specific color passages [24]. The obscuring of these intentional surface effects through later varnishing necessitated precise analytical methods to identify the chemical composition of non-original coatings and inform appropriate conservation strategies.

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a powerful tool for characterizing organic materials in varnish coatings and paint films. The technique's inherent sensitivity, specificity, and non-destructive capabilities make it particularly valuable for analyzing art and historical objects [6]. Recent advancements in portable FTIR (pFTIR) instrumentation now enable in situ analysis, overcoming the limitations of micro-sampling and allowing comprehensive examination of entire paintings [24]. This application note details the systematic evaluation of portable Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) for identifying non-original varnish layers on three selected Munch paintings, establishing a protocol for non-invasive varnish characterization in painting collections.

Materials and Methods

Painting Selection and Historical Context

Three paintings from Munch's earlier period (1887-1891) were selected based on specific criteria: early creation date, early acquisition by the museum, well-documented provenance, minimal restoration history, and visually detectable varnish coatings [24]. The selected works were Flower Meadow Field (Woll 148), Portrait of Hans Jæger (Woll 174), and Night in Nice (Woll 224). Conservation records indicated that Portrait of Hans Jæger was treated in 1954 with mastic varnish, while the other two paintings received synthetic polycyclohexanone varnish (Laropal K80) in 1983 [24].

Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques

Prior to spectroscopic analysis, preliminary examination documented surface topography and varnish distribution using:

• Optical and Digital Microscopy: A Leica Wild M8 stereomicroscope (5× to 50× magnification) and Hirox RH-2000-3D digital microscope captured surface details and identified appropriate locations for pFTIR analysis [28].
• Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Photography: Conducted following CHARISMA standards using a Hasselblad H6D-400C MS digital camera with Baader UV/IR Cut/L-Filter and Target-UV calibration patch to map varnish distribution [24] [28].
• Infrared Reflectography (IRR): Performed using an ARTIST camera (700–1100 nm spectral range) to characterize pigment distribution and underlying features [24].

Portable FTIR Spectroscopy (DRIFTS)

In situ spectra were acquired in diffuse reflectance mode using a portable FTIR spectrometer. The system was equipped with a reflectance module and deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector, collecting spectra from approximately 6 mm diameter sample areas [29]. Key measurement parameters included:

• Spectral Range: 7500–375 cm⁻¹, focusing on the near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) regions
• Resolution: 4 cm⁻¹
• Scan Accumulation: 200 scans per spectrum
• Background Reference: Gold mirror
• Spectral Processing: Kramers–Kronig transform for MIR, pseudo-absorbance Log(1/R) for NIR [29]

Reference Spectral Library Development

A critical component involved creating a customized DRIFT spectral library from known reference materials:

• Historic Varnish Samples: Obtained from museum records of varnishes used between 1909-1993, including dammar, mastic, polycyclohexanone (Laropal K80), and hydrogenated cyclohexanone-co-methyl-cyclohexanone (MS2A) [24].
• Dry Varnish Specimens: Prepared and analyzed to establish reference spectra for natural and synthetic resins documented in treatment records [24].
• Validation: References were compared with micro-samples from selected spot locations to verify accuracy [24].

Complementary Analytical Techniques

To corroborate FTIR findings and provide additional context:

• Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (pXRF): Elemental analysis conducted at pFTIR measurement locations to identify inorganic pigments and complement organic characterization [24] [28].
• Surface Gloss Measurements: Quantified visual properties of varnish coatings at analysis points [24].
• Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Employed on related Munch paintings to visualize varnish layer stratigraphy and thickness non-invasively [28].

Table 1: Key Varnish Materials Identified in the Munch Collection

Varnish Type	Chemical Classification	Historical Application Period	Key IR Spectral Features
Dammar	Natural resin	Early 20th century	Carbonyl stretch (~1740 cm⁻¹), C-H vibrations
Mastic	Natural resin	Mid-20th century (e.g., 1954)	Carbonyl stretch, distinctive fingerprint region
Laropal K80	Synthetic polycyclohexanone	Late 20th century (e.g., 1983)	Aliphatic ketone characteristics
MS2A	Synthetic cyclohexanone co-polymer	Late 20th century	Modified ketone spectral pattern

Experimental Protocol: Non-Invasive Varnish Screening

Pre-Analysis Documentation

• Condition Examination: Visually inspect painting surface under normal, raking, and ultraviolet illumination.
• Surface Mapping: Document varnish distribution, thickness variations, and fluorescence patterns.
• Spot Selection: Identify representative areas for analysis across different visual characteristics.

Instrument Setup

• FTIR Configuration: Configure portable spectrometer with diffuse reflectance accessory.
• Background Measurement: Acquire background spectrum on gold reference mirror.
• Positioning: Stabilize instrument on tripod, maintaining consistent distance and angle to painting surface.

Spectral Acquisition

• Data Collection: Acquire spectra from selected spots (200 scans per spectrum, 4 cm⁻¹ resolution).
• Quality Assessment: Verify signal-to-noise ratio and absence of saturation.
• Replication: Collect multiple spectra from each area to ensure reproducibility.

Data Analysis Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the systematic workflow for the non-invasive analysis of varnish layers:

Results and Discussion

Varnish Identification and Characterization

The pFTIR screening successfully identified different varnish types applied to the three Munch paintings. Analysis revealed spectral signatures consistent with specific natural and synthetic resins documented in museum records. The portable DRIFTS method distinguished between non-original varnish coatings and potential original surface treatments, providing chemical evidence to address the varnish controversy.

The research demonstrated pFTIR's capability to identify both natural resins (dammar, mastic) and synthetic varnishes (Laropal K80, MS2A) in situ [24]. The systematic approach enabled comprehensive screening of multiple areas across each painting, overcoming the spot-specific limitations of micro-sampling. The custom spectral library proved essential for accurate identification, particularly for synthetic resins with characteristic aliphatic ketone patterns.

Complementary Technique Correlation

Findings from pFTIR analysis aligned with complementary techniques:

• pXRF: Provided elemental data supporting pigment identification and contextualizing varnish analysis [24].
• OCT: Cross-sectional visualization of varnish layers in related Munch paintings confirmed layer structure and thickness, correlating with pFTIR chemical identification [28].
• UVA Fluorescence: Distribution patterns guided pFTIR spot selection and complemented chemical characterization with visual evidence [24].

The multi-technique approach provided comprehensive understanding of the complex varnish history, enabling informed decisions regarding conservation treatment strategies.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Varnish Analysis

Material/Standard	Type	Function in Research
Dammar resin	Natural resin reference	Reference material for historical natural varnish identification
Mastic resin	Natural resin reference	Reference for mid-20th century conservation varnishes
Laropal K80	Synthetic resin reference	Polycyclohexanone varnish standard for late 20th century treatments
MS2A	Synthetic resin reference	Cyclohexanone co-polymer varnish standard
Gold mirror	Analytical reference	Background reference for reflectance measurements
Historical varnish samples	Archived references	Batch-specific varnishes from museum conservation records

This case study demonstrates that portable FTIR spectroscopy, specifically DRIFTS methodology, provides an effective non-invasive approach for identifying and characterizing varnish coatings on historical paintings. The protocol successfully addressed the specific challenge of resolving the varnish controversy in Edvard Munch's paintings by chemically identifying non-original coatings applied contrary to the artist's intent.

The systematic combination of pFTIR with complementary non-invasive techniques enabled comprehensive analysis of the complex varnish history without physical sampling. The customized reference spectral library proved essential for accurate material identification, particularly for synthetic resins used in later conservation treatments.

This analytical approach provides conservators and conservation scientists with a viable non-invasive screening method for characterizing varnish coatings across painting collections, supporting appropriate treatment decisions and preserving artistic intent. The methodology establishes a framework for ethical conservation practice, minimizing intervention while maximizing understanding of complex material histories in cultural heritage objects.

The development of targeted conservation treatments for painted surfaces is predicated on a molecular-level understanding of the materials present. Within this research framework, Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy serves as a critical analytical tool for characterizing both original components, such as paint binders, and later additions, including aged varnish layers. The data derived from FTIR analysis directly informs two primary interventive treatments: the strategic removal of degraded varnishes and the subsequent retouching of losses. These protocols are not generic but are highly specific, dictated by the chemical identity and condition of the materials, as revealed through spectroscopic interrogation.

Application Notes: Quantitative Data from FTIR Analysis

FTIR analysis provides both qualitative identification and, with appropriate calibration, quantitative data essential for treatment planning. The following tables summarize key spectral indicators and material properties relevant to conservation decision-making.

Table 1: Key FTIR Spectral Signatures for Common Varnish and Binder Materials

Material	Key FTIR Absorbance Bands (cm⁻¹)	Functional Group Assignment	Diagnostic Significance for Conservation
Dammar	~3070, 1645, 890	C-H stretch (=C-H), C=C stretch, C-H bend	Presence of triterpenoid resins; yellowing and craquelure upon aging.
Mastic	~3070, 1715 (broad), 1690, 1175	C-H stretch (=C-H), C=O stretch (acid), C=O stretch (oxidation product)	Indicates oxidative degradation; forms non-original, discolored carbonyl species.
Linseed Oil	~2925, 2855, 1740, 1160, 1100	C-H stretch (CH₂), C=O stretch (ester), C-O stretch (ester)	Differentiates oil paint (original) from resin varnish (additive).
Acrylic (Paraloid B-72)	~1730, 1150, 1450, 1385	C=O stretch (ester), C-O-C stretch (ester), C-H bend	Identifies synthetic varnishes and modern retouching media.
Animal Glue	~3280, 1645 (Amide I), 1540 (Amide II), 1450	N-H stretch, C=O stretch, N-H bend, C-H bend	Characterizes ground layers; sensitive to aqueous cleaning systems.

Table 2: Varnish Solubility Parameters Informing Removal Strategies

Varnish Type (Aged)	Hansen Solubility Parameters (δD, δP, δH [MPa¹/²])	Recommended Solvent/Gel System (Example)	FTIR-Based Justification
Oxidized Dammar	~18.5, 8.5, 6.5	50:50 Xylenes:Acetone or 3% Viscous Parmul Gel in same	FTIR shows increased carbonyl (1715 cm⁻¹) from oxidation, requiring stronger solvents.
Cross-linked Mastic	~19.0, 9.0, 7.0	5% Propylene Carbonate in Mineral Spirits or Ethyl Cellulose poultice	High polarity (δP/δH) due to aged, cross-linked network identified by broad C=O and O-H stretches.
Acrylic Resin	~18.0, 10.0, 7.5	50:50 DMSO:Ethanol or 2% Klucel G Gel in same	FTIR confirms ester groups (1730, 1150 cm⁻¹); requires polar, hydrogen-bonding solvents.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: FTIR Analysis of Paint Cross-Sections for Varnish-Binder Interface Characterization

Objective: To identify the chemical composition of individual layers in a paint cross-section to understand the varnish-original paint interface and assess the risk of leaching or swelling during cleaning.

Methodology:

• Sample Acquisition: A micro-sample (≤ 0.5 mm) is taken from a representative and discreet location using a scalpel under a stereomicroscope.
• Embedding and Polishing: The sample is embedded in a clear, non-invasive epoxy resin (e.g., Bio-Plastic). The block is cured, then dry-polished with progressively finer grits (1200 to 12000) of silicon carbide paper to expose a smooth cross-sectional surface.
• FTIR Mapping (ATR Mode): a. The polished cross-section is analyzed using an FTIR spectrometer coupled with a microscope and a Germanium crystal ATR objective. b. A grid is defined over the area of interest, encompassing the varnish, any intermediate layers, and the upper paint layer. c. An infrared spectrum is collected at each pixel (e.g., 10x10 µm) within the grid. Spectral resolution: 4-8 cm⁻¹; scans: 64-128.
• Data Processing: Multivariate analysis (e.g., Principal Component Analysis - PCA) or functional group mapping is applied to the spectral dataset. This generates chemical maps based on the distribution of key absorbance bands (e.g., carbonyl for varnish, ester for oil paint).

Diagram: FTIR Cross-Section Analysis Workflow

Protocol 2: FTIR-Monitored Solubility Testing for Varnish Removal

Objective: To determine the safest and most effective solvent system for removing a degraded varnish without affecting the underlying original paint.

Methodology:

• Baseline FTIR: An FTIR spectrum is collected from the varnished surface using a portable FTIR with a reflection head or from a micro-sample as in Protocol 1.
• Solvent Selection: A range of solvent mixtures is prepared based on the Hansen Solubility Parameters and the initial FTIR identification of the varnish.
• Application and Monitoring: a. A small cotton swab, lightly dampened with the test solvent, is rolled gently on the surface for 1-3 seconds. b. The test area is immediately examined under a stereomicroscope and with UV light for any signs of varnish removal, pigment transfer, or paint swelling. c. After drying, a new FTIR spectrum is collected from the exact same test spot.
• Data Interpretation: The post-test spectrum is compared to the baseline. Successful varnish removal is indicated by a reduction in resin-specific bands (e.g., terpenoid C-H, oxidized carbonyl). A successful outcome shows no alteration to the paint binder's spectral profile (e.g., oil ester bands at ~1740, 1160 cm⁻¹).

Diagram: Varnish Removal Testing Logic

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Reagent / Material	Function in Research & Treatment
Germanium ATR Crystal	Enables high spatial resolution FTIR analysis of cross-sections without destructive sample preparation.
Bio-Plastic Embedding Resin	A clear, stable, and non-reactive epoxy for preparing polished cross-sections for microscopic and spectroscopic analysis.
Hansen Solubility Parameter Software	Computational tools to predict solvent efficacy and formulate customized, minimally invasive varnish removal systems.
Viscous Parmul 2% Gel	A polyacrylic acid-based thickener that creates a solvent gel for controlled, localized application, minimizing penetration.
Deionized Water / Ethanol Azeotrope	A low-surface-tension, polar solvent mixture used for testing the cleaning of water-sensitive surfaces like acrylic paints.
Cyclododecane	A volatile binding temporary barrier applied to fragile areas (e.g., powdery paint) to protect them during varnish removal.

Solving Common FTIR Challenges in Complex Art Samples

Addressing Spectral Contamination from Dirty ATR Crystals and Sample Preparation

In the field of art conservation research, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is an indispensable tool for identifying organic materials such as paint binders and varnishes in cultural heritage objects [13] [6]. The Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) sampling mode, in particular, has gained widespread adoption due to its minimal sample preparation requirements and high spatial resolution, enabling the characterization of complex, multi-layered structures in artworks [13] [18]. However, the integrity of ATR-FTIR data can be significantly compromised by spectral contamination arising from improper crystal cleaning and inadequate sample preparation protocols. This application note outlines standardized procedures to mitigate these issues within the specific context of art conservation research, ensuring reliable identification of binding media and surface coatings in paintings and other cultural artifacts.

The Impact of ATR Crystal Contamination

A contaminated ATR crystal is a primary source of spectral interference. The evanescent wave, which typically penetrates 0.3–3 µm into the sample, interacts with residual material from previous measurements if the crystal is not properly cleaned [13] [18]. This can lead to:

• False Positives: Detection of compounds not actually present in the sample.
• Spectral Obscuration: Overlap of contaminant bands with key diagnostic peaks of binders and varnishes (e.g., carbonyl stretches).
• Reduced Signal-to-Noise Ratio: Degraded spectral quality complicates both visual interpretation and chemometric analysis [30].

The following table summarizes common contaminants and their spectral interference in art conservation:

Table 1: Common ATR Contaminants and Their Spectral Interference in Art Conservation

Contaminant Source	Characteristic IR Bands (cm⁻¹)	Potential Interference with Artistic Materials
Residual Paint/Binder	C=O stretch (~1740-1710), C-H stretches (~2950-2850)	Obscures identification of oil binders, resin varnishes, or modern polymer coatings [18].
Skin Oils/Fingerprints	N-H stretches (~3300), C-H stretches (~2920, 2850)	Interferes with protein detection (e.g., egg tempera, animal glue) [14].
Previous Sample Residue	Varies with material	Can lead to misidentification of pigments, fillers, or degradation products.
Improper Cleaning Solvents	Solvent-specific bands (e.g., alcohols, ketones)	Introduces extraneous organic peaks, complicating binder analysis.

Experimental Protocols for ATR Analysis in Conservation

Mandatory ATR Crystal Cleaning Protocol

Maintaining a pristine ATR crystal is the most critical step in preventing cross-contamination between valuable art samples. The following protocol should be performed before and after every single measurement [31].

Research Reagent Solutions & Materials:

Table 2: Essential Materials for ATR Crystal Cleaning

Material	Function	Usage Notes
Heptane or Isooctane	Non-polar solvent for dissolving organic residues like oils, resins, and old varnishes.	Effective on dried oil paints and synthetic polymers [31] [18].
Isopropanol	Polar solvent for removing water-soluble contaminants and some polar binders.	Use as an alternative or sequential cleaner depending on the sample [18].
Non-abrasive Wipes	Lint-free, unscented laboratory wipes (e.g., Kimwipes).	Prevents scratching of soft ATR crystals like germanium [31] [32].
Powder-free Nitrile Gloves	To prevent contamination from skin oils and fingerprints.	Essential for handling both samples and the ATR accessory [31].

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Initial Removal: Use a clean, non-abrasive laboratory wipe to gently soak up and remove the bulk of the sample material from the crystal surface. Avoid excessive force to prevent damaging the crystal [31].
• Dry Cleaning: Use a new, clean wipe to gently brush any remaining particulate matter from the crystal and the surrounding metal plate.
• Solvent Cleaning: Place a few drops of a suitable cleaning solvent (e.g., heptane for organic media, isopropanol for polar contaminants) onto a fresh wipe. Thoroughly clean the crystal and the immediate area around it. Allow the solvent to fully evaporate.
• Verification: Perform a "cleanness test" by collecting a background spectrum and comparing it to a stored reference clean crystal spectrum. Any significant peaks indicate residual contamination, requiring repeated cleaning [18].

Sample Preparation Methodologies

The choice of sample preparation is dictated by the analytical goal and the permissible level of invasiveness for the artwork.

Workflow for Sample Preparation in Art Conservation

Non-Invasive Analysis: For direct analysis of an artwork's surface without any sampling.

• Technique: Use External Reflection (ER) FTIR [14] [6].
• Procedure: The portable spectrometer's reflection module is positioned a short distance (approximately 1 mm) from the object's surface. No contact or pressure is applied, making it ideal for fragile, valuable, or varnished surfaces [14].
• Limitations: Spectra can exhibit derivative-like distortions and reststrahlen bands (inverted peaks), especially with inorganic pigments like carbonates, complicating interpretation [14].

Micro-Invasive Analysis: When sampling is permitted, but the sample must remain intact for further analysis.

• Technique: Direct ATR-FTIR on micro-samples [13] [18].
• Procedure: A microscopic sample (e.g., a paint fragment) is removed from the artwork. It is then placed on the ATR crystal and measured either by manually applying pressure or using the instrument's clamp to ensure good optical contact [18].
• Considerations: Manual pressure is often necessary for fragile or irregularly shaped micro-samples that cannot be clamped without risk of damage [18].

Invasive Cross-Section Analysis: For investigating the stratigraphy of a paint layer.

• Technique: ATR-FTIR spectroscopic imaging of embedded cross-sections [13] [32].
• Procedure:
  • A paint fragment is embedded in an acrylic resin block [32].
  • The block is ground and dry-polished using successive grades of abrasive cloths (e.g., up to 12,000 grit) to reveal a smooth cross-sectional surface [32].
  • The polished cross-section is analyzed using an ATR-FTIR microscope equipped with a Focal Plane Array (FPA) detector. This allows for the simultaneous collection of thousands of spectra, generating a 2D chemical map of the different layers (e.g., binder, pigment, ground) [13] [32].

Data Preprocessing to Mitigate Residual Contamination

Even with meticulous cleaning, residual spectral effects can persist. Data preprocessing is a critical step to correct for these and other artifacts, thereby improving the accuracy of material identification [30].

Table 3: Essential Data Preprocessing Techniques for ATR-FTIR Spectra

Preprocessing Technique	Function	Application in Conservation
Baseline Correction	Removes unwanted baseline shifts and curvature caused by light scattering or instrument drift.	Crucial for obtaining accurate peak positions and intensities, especially for quantifying degradation products [30].
Normalization	Adjusts all spectra to a common intensity scale (e.g., min-max, area-under-curve).	Corrects for variations in sample thickness or contact pressure, allowing direct comparison of band intensities between different samples or regions [30].
Derivative Spectroscopy	Applies first or second derivatives to the spectra.	Enhances the resolution of overlapping absorption bands (common in complex binder mixtures) and suppresses broad baseline effects [33] [30].
Standard Normal Variate (SNV)	Corrects for multiplicative scaling and additive effects from scattering and pathlength differences.	Useful for normalizing spectra collected from uneven or textured sample surfaces [30].

Robust protocols for ATR crystal cleaning and sample preparation are fundamental to ensuring the reliability of FTIR spectroscopy in art conservation research. By adhering to the standardized cleaning procedure, selecting the appropriate sample handling method based on the artifact's value and analytical needs, and applying corrective data preprocessing, researchers can significantly reduce spectral contamination. This rigorous approach yields high-quality, interpretable data essential for the unequivocal identification of paint binders and varnishes, ultimately informing accurate art historical interpretations, authentication studies, and safe conservation strategies.

Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is a cornerstone technique in art conservation research, providing unmatched molecular specificity for identifying paint binders, varnishes, and other organic materials. However, its application is fundamentally constrained by the diffraction limit of light, a physical barrier that restricts the spatial resolution of traditional infrared microscopes to approximately 10 microns, or 10,000 nanometers [34]. This limitation is particularly problematic in cultural heritage science, where paint stratigraphy, degradation products, and individual pigment-binder interactions occur at the sub-micron scale. When analyzing a cross-section from an Old Master painting, for instance, a 10-micron spot size cannot resolve individual layers of a complex glaze or pinpoint the precise location of a deteriorating varnish within a heterogeneous matrix. Overcoming this barrier is therefore not merely a technical exercise but a necessity for advancing the understanding of artistic materials and their preservation needs.

The diffraction limit, originally defined by Ernst Abbe over 150 years ago, states that the smallest resolvable distance between two point sources is approximately half the wavelength of the light used for imaging [35]. For mid-infrared light, which is essential for FTIR spectroscopy, wavelengths range from 2.5 to 25 microns, thus imposing a fundamental resolution limit of several microns. In practice, this means that the focused infrared beam in a conventional FTIR microscope cannot be smaller than this diffraction-limited spot size. Consequently, the analyzed area represents an average of all chemical components within that spot, obscuring critical micro-scale compositional variations. For researchers studying the molecular interactions between a protein-based binder and a specific pigment particle, or the localized hydrolysis of a resinous varnish, this lack of spatial resolution can mask the very phenomena they seek to understand.

Super-Resolution Techniques: Principles and Applications

Optical Photothermal Infrared (O-PTIR) Spectroscopy

A breakthrough in sub-micron IR spectroscopy, Optical Photothermal IR (O-PTIR) overcomes the diffraction limit by using an innovative detection scheme [34]. Unlike conventional FTIR microscopy, which directly detects the absorbed infrared light, O-PTIR uses a pulsed, wavelength-tunable IR laser to excite molecular vibrations in the sample. A second, co-aligned and focused visible laser (532 nm, green) acts as a probe to detect the photothermal effect induced by the IR absorption. When the sample absorbs the IR light, it heats up slightly, leading to a minute change in its refractive index. This change is detected as a modulation in the intensity of the reflected or transmitted visible probe laser. Critically, the spatial resolution of this measurement is now determined by the diffraction-limited spot of the visible probe laser (~500 nm or 0.5 microns), not the IR light, thereby achieving sub-micron resolution for IR spectroscopy [34].

Table 1: Comparison of Traditional FTIR Microscopy and O-PTIR

Feature	Traditional FTIR Microscopy	O-PTIR
Spatial Resolution	~10 microns [34]	< 500 nm (0.5 microns) [34]
Primary Limitation	Diffraction of IR light	Overcome by using a visible probe laser
Key Advantage	Well-established, benchtop systems	Sub-micron chemical analysis; co-located Raman & Fluorescence [34]
Sample Throughput	Relatively fast mapping	Point or small-area mapping
Ideal For	Bulk material analysis, homogeneous samples	Heterogeneous samples, sub-cellular structures, micro-plastics, pharmaceutical formulations [34]

Other Super-Resolution Microscopy Approaches

While O-PTIR is particularly suited for IR spectroscopy, other super-resolution fluorescence microscopy techniques have paved the way for breaking the diffraction barrier in life sciences. These methods, which can achieve resolution an order of magnitude better than the diffraction limit, fall into two primary classes:

• Ensemble Imaging with Patterned Illumination: Techniques like Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy and Saturated Structured Illumation Microscopy (SSIM) use a patterned light field to spatially modulate the fluorescence emission within a diffraction-limited region. In STED, a depletion laser with a donut-shaped profile suppresses fluorescence emission from the periphery of the excitation spot, effectively sharping the focal spot to a sub-diffraction size [35]. Scanning this sharpened spot across the sample generates a super-resolution image.
• Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy (SMLM): This category, which includes STORM and PALM, relies on the stochastic activation of a sparse subset of fluorescent molecules at a time [35]. Since only a few, spatially separated molecules are "on" in each frame, their precise positions can be determined by calculating the center of their point spread function with nanometer accuracy. A super-resolution image is then reconstructed from the precise locations of thousands to millions of individual molecules.

Although these fluorescence techniques are not directly applicable to FTIR, they share a common philosophical thread with O-PTIR: the use of a clever physical or chemical mechanism to circumvent the Abbe limit.

Application Notes for Art Conservation Research

The ability to perform FTIR analysis at sub-micron resolution opens new avenues for answering persistent questions in art conservation.

Analysis of Paint Binders and Varnishes

O-PTIR enables the precise correlation of organic materials with specific paint layers and pigment particles. For example, in a complex multi-layer painting, a conservator can interrogate a cross-section to:

• Identify the specific binder (e.g., linseed oil, walnut oil, egg tempera) associated with a single, sub-micron pigment grain within a mixture.
• Map the distribution of a natural resin varnish and precisely locate its degradation products (e.g., oxidized triterpenoids) within a thin, aged film, which is impossible with traditional FTIR.
• Diagnose the cause of blanching (a whitish haze) in a varnish by identifying micron-scale inclusions of water or other contaminants.

In-Situ Non-Destructive Analysis

The drive for non-destructive analysis is paramount in cultural heritage [36]. While handheld FTIR devices allow in-situ analysis of large objects without sampling, they still operate at macro-scale resolution [6]. O-PTIR, though typically a laboratory-based technique, represents the ultimate form of micro-destructive analysis. It requires a sample the size of a cross-section, but from that minute fragment, it extracts a wealth of sub-micron chemical information that was previously inaccessible. This capability aligns with the core ethos of conservation: to minimize intervention while maximizing understanding. The technique has been successfully applied to analyze heterogeneous samples in fields like pharmaceuticals and materials science [34], demonstrating its readiness for application to complex cultural heritage materials.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Sub-Micron FTIR Analysis

Reagent/Material	Function in Experimental Protocol
Embedding Resin (e.g., Bio-Plastic)	For preparing stable, non-infiltration cross-sections of paint samples for O-PTIR analysis.
Silicon Wafer / IR-Transparent Substrate	Provides an optimal, low-background substrate for mounting micro-samples for reflection O-PTIR measurement.
Metallic Nanoparticles (e.g., Gold)	Sputter-coating to provide a conductive layer for enhanced signal in certain O-PTIR operational modes, mitigating charging on non-conductive samples.
Reference Standards (e.g., Pure Linseed Oil, Dammar Resin)	Essential for building a spectral library to ensure accurate identification of unknown paint binders and varnishes.

Experimental Protocol: O-PTIR Analysis of a Paint Cross-Section

Objective: To identify the spatial distribution of a protein-based binder and a terpenoid varnish within a sub-micron stratigraphy of a historical paint cross-section.

Materials and Equipment:

• O-PTIR microscope (e.g., mIRage or mIRage-LS) [34].
• Paint cross-section embedded in a stable resin, polished to a smooth surface.
• Reference spectra of relevant materials (proteins, drying oils, terpenoid resins).

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Prepare a polished paint cross-section according to standard conservation practices, ensuring a smooth, flat surface for reliable O-PTIR analysis. Mounting on a silicon wafer is recommended.
• System Setup: Place the sample in the O-PTIR microscope. Select the reflection mode. Align the co-axial IR excitation and visible probe lasers.
• Region of Interest (ROI) Selection: Use the high-resolution visible imaging capability of the system to locate a specific region of interest within the cross-section, such as a thin glaze layer or a varnish-paint interface.
• Spectral Acquisition: a. Single-Point Mode: Position the probe over a feature of interest (e.g., a specific pigment particle) and acquire a full O-PTIR spectrum (e.g., from 1800 to 800 cm⁻¹). b. Mapping Mode: Define a rectangular area encompassing the stratigraphic layers. Set the step size to a sub-micron value (e.g., 500 nm) and acquire a spectrum at each pixel.
• Data Analysis: a. Pre-process the spectra (e.g., atmospheric correction, baseline correction). b. Compare single-point spectra to the reference library to identify the molecular composition at specific locations. c. For mapping data, generate chemical images (maps) by integrating the intensity of characteristic absorption bands (e.g., Amide I band ~1650 cm⁻¹ for protein; carbonyl band ~1700 cm⁻¹ for varnish).
• Validation: Correlate O-PTIR chemical maps with images from complementary techniques such as visible light microscopy or SEM-EDS of the same cross-section to confirm morphological and elemental context.

Diagram 1: Experimental workflow for O-PTIR analysis of a paint cross-section.

The advent of super-resolution techniques like O-PTIR spectroscopy marks a paradigm shift in the FTIR analysis of cultural heritage materials. By decisively overcoming the diffraction limit, it provides conservation scientists with an unprecedented ability to probe the chemical complexity of artworks at a meaningful, sub-micron scale. This powerful capability allows for the precise localization of binders and varnishes within intricate paint stratigraphy, leading to a more profound understanding of an artist's technique and the specific pathways of material degradation. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more accessible, they will undeniably become indispensable tools in the ongoing effort to preserve and interpret our shared cultural patrimony.

In the specialized field of art conservation research, the non-invasive analysis of cultural heritage objects, such as paintings, requires precise spectroscopic techniques and appropriate data processing methods. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a cornerstone technique for identifying the molecular composition of paint binders and varnishes without compromising the integrity of priceless artworks [5] [6]. Unlike traditional sampling methods that require physical removal of specimen materials, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy offers a non-contact, non-destructive approach to analysis, making it particularly valuable for museum conservation efforts [5] [15]. The analytical value of the collected data, however, hinges critically on the correct selection and application of data processing algorithms. Within this context, a fundamental challenge arises in choosing between the well-established Kubelka-Munk theory and the more straightforward conversion to absorbance units when interpreting diffuse reflectance spectra. This application note examines the theoretical foundations, practical applications, and methodological protocols for both approaches within the specific context of FTIR analysis of paint binders and varnishes in art conservation research.

Theoretical Framework

The Kubelka-Munk Theory

Devised by Paul Kubelka and Franz Munk in 1931, Kubelka-Munk theory provides a mathematical model for describing the diffuse reflecting properties of scattering media [37]. The theory employs a two-flux approximation, modeling the propagation of light through a material as two diffuse light fluxes—one moving downward into the sample and the other simultaneously upward toward the detector [37]. The model characterizes the medium using two phenomenological constants: the absorption coefficient (K) and the scattering coefficient (S) [37] [38].

For an infinitely thick, opaque coating—a condition often approximated by densely packed paint samples—the theory yields the well-known Kubelka-Munk equation, which relates the remission from the sample (R∞) to the ratio of absorption to scattering:

The function was later reformulated to resolve for the ratio a₀/r₀ in terms of R∞, leading to what is now commonly referred to as the Kubelka-Munk or remission function [39] [37]:

This function is particularly valuable for spectroscopic applications because it provides a quantity F(R∞) that is theoretically proportional to the concentration of an absorbing species in a scattering medium, analogous to absorbance in transmission spectroscopy [37].

Absorbance Units (Log(1/R)) for Diffuse Reflection

As a simpler alternative to Kubelka-Munk treatment, many practitioners in spectroscopic fields, particularly near-infrared spectroscopy, have adopted the use of log(1/R) as a measure analogous to absorbance in transmission spectroscopy [37]. This approach applies the same mathematical transformation used in transmission spectroscopy to convert reflectance measurements into pseudo-absorbance units:

where R is the measured reflectance. While this transformation lacks the theoretical foundation of Kubelka-Munk theory, it offers practical advantages in terms of computational simplicity and has been found to provide satisfactory linearity with concentration in certain applications, particularly at lower absorption levels and when scatter is relatively constant [37].

Table 1: Comparison of Data Processing Approaches for Diffuse Reflectance FTIR

Feature	Kubelka-Munk Transformation	Absorbance Units (Log(1/R))
Theoretical Basis	Derived from two-flux model of radiation transfer	Empirical adaptation from transmission spectroscopy
Mathematical Form	F(R∞) = (1 - R∞)² / 2R∞	A = log₁₀(1/R)
Linearity with Concentration	Theoretical linearity with absorber concentration in scattering media	Approximately linear at low absorption levels; deviations at higher absorption
Scatter Dependence	Explicitly accounts for both absorption and scattering	Does not explicitly separate absorption from scattering
Common Applications	Analysis of powdered samples, pigment mixtures, paper coatings	Near-infrared spectroscopy of particulate samples, qualitative analysis
Limitations	Fails in strongly absorbing materials; assumes ideal scatter	Lacks theoretical foundation for scattering materials

Experimental Protocols for Paint Analysis in Art Conservation

Non-Contact FTIR Reflectance Measurements

The analysis of paint binders and varnishes in art conservation requires meticulous protocol execution to ensure non-destructive examination of valuable artworks:

• Instrument Setup: Configure the FTIR spectrometer with an external reflection accessory (e.g., ConservatIR FTIR External Reflection Accessory). Ensure the instrument is properly configured for the desired spectral range (mid-IR: 4000-400 cm⁻¹; far-IR: 1800-100 cm⁻¹) [15].

• Sample Positioning: Place the artwork or paint sample 1-2 mm from the sampling aperture of the reflection accessory. Use the integrated camera system to visualize the sampled spot and ensure precise positioning without physical contact [5].

• Spectral Collection: Collect reflectance spectra at 4 cm⁻¹ resolution with 32-64 scans to achieve adequate signal-to-noise ratio. For paintings, analyze multiple areas to account for potential heterogeneity in material composition [40] [15].

• Data Transformation: Apply the Kramers-Kronig transformation to the raw reflectance spectra to correct for the derivative-like features caused by anomalous dispersion in specular reflection [15]. This step is essential for obtaining spectra comparable to conventional transmission or ATR-FTIR spectra.

Data Processing Workflow

The following workflow delineates the critical steps for proper data processing of diffuse reflectance FTIR spectra in art conservation research:

Diagram 1: Data processing workflow for diffuse reflectance FTIR spectra in art conservation research.

Protocol for Method Selection and Validation

• Assessment of Sample Characteristics:

  • Evaluate the scattering properties of the paint sample. Highly scattering materials with fine particles are more suited to Kubelka-Munk treatment.
  • Determine the absorption intensity. Kubelka-Munk theory may fail for strongly absorbing materials [37].

• Selection Criteria:

  • Choose Kubelka-Munk transformation for quantitative analysis of pigment concentrations or binder ratios in paints.
  • Select absorbance units for qualitative identification of materials or when comparing to existing spectral libraries primarily composed of transmission or ATR-FTIR data.

• Validation Procedure:

  • When possible, validate the selected method using standard reference materials with known composition.
  • Compare results between Kubelka-Munk and absorbance units for a subset of samples to identify which provides better agreement with expected outcomes based on art historical knowledge of materials.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Materials for Reflectance FTIR in Art Conservation

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions and Materials for FTIR Analysis of Paint Binders

Item	Function/Application	Examples/Specifications
FTIR Spectrometer with External Reflection Accessory	Enables non-contact reflectance measurements of artworks	Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 with ConservatIR accessory [5] [15]
Reference Pigment Standards	Validation and calibration of spectroscopic methods	Prussian Blue, Cadmium Yellow, Zinc White [15]
Spectral Libraries	Identification of unknown paint components	Custom libraries of historical pigments, binders, and varnishes
Kramers-Kronig Transformation Software	Correction of reflectance spectra for meaningful interpretation	Integrated in OMNIC Software or similar spectral processing packages [15]
Handheld FTIR Analyzer	In-situ analysis of large or immovable artworks	Agilent 4100 ExoScan and 4200 FlexScan systems [6]

Application in Art Conservation Research

Case Study: Analysis of Historical Paint Formulations

The practical implications of data processing method selection are evident in the analysis of historical paint formulations. In a study examining the stability of retouching paints containing ultramarine blue and cadmium yellow pigments, FTIR spectroscopy was employed to monitor chemical changes resulting from accelerated aging [40]. The correct processing of diffuse reflectance data was essential for accurately identifying oxidation products in paint binders and quantifying the extent of degradation.

For the analysis of cadmium yellow (CdS), an inorganic pigment, far-IR reflectance measurements (800-100 cm⁻¹) proved particularly valuable as this pigment exhibits characteristic spectral features in this region that are absent in the mid-IR [15]. The application of Kubelka-Munk transformation to these far-IR spectra enabled researchers to distinguish between cadmium yellow and modern alternatives such as benzimidazolone yellow, informing conservation decisions regarding historical accuracy in restoration materials.

Decision Framework for Method Selection

The following diagram illustrates the decision process for selecting between Kubelka-Munk and absorbance units based on specific analytical requirements in art conservation research:

Diagram 2: Decision framework for selecting data processing methods in art conservation FTIR analysis.

The selection between Kubelka-Munk transformation and absorbance units for processing diffuse reflectance FTIR spectra represents a critical methodological decision that significantly impacts the reliability and interpretation of analytical data in art conservation research. While the Kubelka-Munk theory provides a more rigorous theoretical foundation for quantitative analysis of scattering materials like paint layers, the simpler conversion to absorbance units offers practical advantages for qualitative identification and library matching. Conservation scientists must consider the specific analytical requirements, sample characteristics, and intended application when selecting the appropriate data processing method. Through the disciplined application of the protocols and decision frameworks outlined in this application note, researchers can optimize their analytical approach to extract meaningful information about paint binders and varnishes while preserving the integrity of cultural heritage objects.

Differentiating Surface Oxidation from Bulk Material Properties

In art conservation research, Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is an indispensable tool for characterizing the chemical composition of paint binders and varnishes. A central analytical challenge is the accurate discrimination between surface-specific degradation phenomena, such as oxidation, and the inherent properties of the bulk material. This distinction is critical for informing appropriate conservation strategies, authenticating artworks, and understanding aging processes in cultural heritage objects [6] [41].

Surface oxidation, often triggered by environmental factors like light, heat, and pollutants, manifests as chemical changes in the uppermost layers of a paint film. Conversely, bulk material properties are defined by the intrinsic composition of the paint, including its binder, pigments, and additives. This document outlines detailed application notes and experimental protocols for using FTIR analysis to differentiate between these two states, providing a framework for researchers and conservation scientists.

FTIR Techniques for Surface vs. Bulk Analysis

The choice of FTIR sampling technique directly influences the depth of analysis and the type of information obtained, making it the primary factor in differentiating surface from bulk properties.

Table 1: Key FTIR Techniques for Surface and Bulk Analysis

Technique	Analysis Depth	Spatial Resolution	Sample Contact	Primary Application in Differentiation
ATR-FTIR [42] [32]	0.3 - 3 µm	~1-10 µm (Diffraction-limited)	Contact required	Near-surface analysis; characterization of thin layers and degradation crusts.
O-PTIR [32]	Sub-micron	< 0.5 µm (Sub-diffraction)	Non-contact	High-resolution surface mapping; analysis of micro-phases and fine degradation products.
External Reflection (ER)-FTIR [14] [5]	Varies with morphology	~5 mm diameter (Portable)	Non-contact	Totally non-invasive in-situ analysis of artwork surfaces.
XPS/NEXAFS [41]	1 - 10 nm	> 10 µm	Vacuum compatible	Ultra-surface-sensitive analysis of organic materials and chemical states at the molecular level.

Technique Selection Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making process for selecting the appropriate analytical method based on research goals and sample constraints.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using ATR-FTIR and O-PTIR

This protocol is designed for a detailed investigation of the stratigraphy of a paint sample, allowing for the correlation of chemical composition with specific layers.

1. Sample Preparation

• Embedding: Embed a delaminated paint fragment (e.g., ~15 µm thick) in an acrylic resin block (e.g., Clarocit) [32].
• Polishing: Grind and polish the cross-section using a progressive series of abrasive cloths (e.g., Micromesh up to 12,000 grit) to achieve a smooth surface for analysis. Dry polishing is recommended to avoid leaching water-soluble components [32].

2. Microscopic Examination

• Examine the polished cross-section with a digital microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to identify regions of interest and document the layer structure [32].

3. ATR-FTIR Imaging

• Instrument Setup: Use an FTIR spectrometer coupled with a microscope equipped with a Germanium (Ge) ATR objective and a Focal Plane Array (FPA) detector (e.g., 64x64) [32].
• Data Acquisition: Place the sample on a motorized stage and bring it into contact with the ATR crystal. Apply minimal pressure to optimize signal and avoid damage. Collect spectra in the range of 4000–900 cm⁻¹ with 64 scans at a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ [32].
• Analysis: Generate chemical images by integrating the absorbance of characteristic bands (e.g., carbonyl stretch at ~1690-1740 cm⁻¹ for oxidation products).

4. O-PTIR Analysis (For sub-micron resolution)

• Instrument Setup: Use a mIRage or similar O-PTIR microscope with a tunable Quantum Cascade Laser (QCL) and a 532 nm probe laser [32].
• Data Acquisition: Focus the probe laser on the specific areas of interest identified in the ATR-FTIR map. Collect spectra in the reflection mode (e.g., 1900–950 cm⁻¹ region) with 8 co-added scans. The laser powers for both IR and probe are typically set to 1–5 mW [32].
• Analysis: The obtained transmission-like spectra can be interpreted against standard libraries to identify specific compounds (e.g., zinc soaps, lactates) at a resolution unattainable by conventional FTIR [32].

Protocol: Non-Invasive Surface Mapping Using Handheld ER-FTIR

This protocol is for the in-situ analysis of paintings or artifacts where sampling is not permitted.

1. Instrument Preparation

• Use a portable FTIR spectrometer equipped with an external reflection accessory (e.g., ConservatIR) [5].
• Allow the instrument to stabilize in the analysis environment (e.g., museum gallery) to minimize spectral noise from atmospheric changes [43].

2. Data Collection

• Position the spectrometer head approximately 1 mm from the artwork's surface. Use the integrated camera to select the analysis spot [5].
• Collect spectra from multiple areas of interest (e.g., discolored vs. intact regions) and from a known, unaltered reference area if possible. A typical measurement collects 40 scans at a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ across the mid-IR and far-IR regions (7500-400 cm⁻¹) to capture both organic and inorganic signatures [14] [5].

3. Spectral Interpretation

• Interpret the complex ER-FTIR spectra, which may exhibit derivative-like bands and reststrahlen effects (inverted bands), by comparing them to reference spectra collected in ATR mode from similar materials [14].
• Key indicators of surface oxidation include an increase in the intensity and broadening of the carbonyl (C=O) stretching band (~1650-1740 cm⁻¹), which can signify the formation of carboxylic acids, ketones, or esters due to binder degradation [6] [41].

Data Interpretation and Key Spectral Markers

Differentiating surface oxidation from bulk properties relies on identifying specific spectral signatures and their spatial distribution.

Table 2: Key FTIR Spectral Markers for Differentiating Surface Oxidation from Bulk Properties

Spectral Region (cm⁻¹)	Bulk Material Assignment	Surface Oxidation Marker	Associated Material Class
~1740-1710	Ester C=O stretch (paint binder)	Shift to ~1690-1650 (carboxylic acid C=O)	Oil, Alkyd, Acrylic polymers [41]
~1650 & 1550	Amide I & II (proteinaceous binder)	Weakening of Amide bands; rise of acid bands	Egg tempera, Collagen (parchment) [14]
~1600	Asymmetric COO⁻ stretch (metal soaps)	Increased intensity in surface layers	Zinc, Lead Soaps (degradation) [32]
~1020-1050	ν(C–O) of glycosidic bond (gum Arabic)	Inverted band in ER-FTIR; weakening	Polysaccharide-based binders [14]
~1300-1000	ν(C–O) of aliphatic esters (bulk acrylic)	Presence of sulfate bands (~1220, 1060)	Migrated surfactant (surface) [41]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for FTIR Analysis in Art Conservation

Item	Function/Application	Specific Examples
Embedding Resin	Supports fragile paint samples for cross-section preparation without chemical interference.	Clarocit acrylic resin [32]
Polishing Substrates	Creates a smooth, flat surface on cross-sections for optimal crystal contact in ATR-FTIR.	Micromesh abrasive cloths (up to 12,000 grit) [32]
ATR Crystals	Enables evanescent wave sampling for micro-analysis. Germanium offers the best spatial resolution.	Germanium (Ge), Zinc Selenide (ZnSe) [42] [32]
Reference Materials	For creating in-house spectral libraries to aid in the identification of unknown components.	Pure gum Arabic, egg yolk, egg white, linseed oil, synthetic pigments [14]
Handheld FTIR with ER Accessory	Enables non-invasive, in-situ analysis of artworks too large or valuable to sample.	Agilent 4100 ExoScan, Thermo Scientific ConservatIR accessory [6] [5]

The systematic differentiation of surface oxidation from bulk material properties is fundamental to advancing the conservation and understanding of cultural heritage. By leveraging a multi-technique FTIR approach—from non-invasive handheld reflection to high-resolution O-PTIR—researchers can obtain a comprehensive chemical portrait of paint binders and varnishes. The protocols and data interpretation guides provided here offer a foundation for conducting robust, reproducible analyses. This enables informed decision-making in conservation treatment, enhances the accuracy of art historical scholarship, and contributes to the long-term preservation of our material cultural heritage.

Validating FTIR Findings with Complementary Analytical Techniques

Integrating LC-Orbitrap MS/MS for Detailed Molecular Characterization

The comprehensive molecular characterization of complex, multicomponent materials represents a significant challenge in fields ranging from cultural heritage science to pharmaceutical development. In the specific context of art conservation research, the analysis of paint binders and varnishes is crucial for understanding artistic techniques, assessing degradation states, and informing restoration strategies. While Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy provides valuable functional group information and has been widely used for the preliminary identification of materials in art objects [6], it often lacks the specificity to resolve complex molecular mixtures or identify low-abundance components. This application note details the integration of Liquid Chromatography-Orbitrap Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-Orbitrap MS/MS) to achieve detailed molecular characterization, creating a powerful complementary technique to FTIR analysis. We present standardized protocols that enable researchers to obtain high-resolution accurate-mass (HRAM) data, facilitating the identification and monitoring of molecular species within intricate sample matrices.

LC-Orbitrap MS/MS Technology and Comparative Advantages

Core Technology Principles

Orbitrap mass analyzers operate by trapping ions around a central spindle electrode, where they undergo harmonic oscillations. The frequency of these oscillations is measured and converted via Fourier transformation into a mass spectrum [44]. This technology provides the foundational benefits of high resolution and mass accuracy, which are critical for confident molecular formula assignment. When coupled with liquid chromatography (LC), the system effectively separates complex mixtures prior to mass analysis, reducing ion suppression and simplifying spectral interpretation. The tandem MS (MS/MS) capability further enables structural elucidation through controlled fragmentation of precursor ions.

Comparison of Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry Platforms

The performance of FT-based MS platforms is critical for applications requiring high confidence in molecular identification. The following table summarizes key performance metrics for Orbitrap and FT-ICR systems, as evidenced in systematic evaluations.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry Platforms

Performance Metric	Orbitrap ID-X MS	12T solariX FT-ICR MS
Typical Mass Accuracy	<1 ppm (with UPLC) [44]	<0.2 ppm (with direct infusion) [44]
Role in Metabolite Annotation	Enables correct elemental formula assignment for >90% of metabolites (m/z 75–466) [44]	Enables correct elemental formula assignment for >90% of metabolites (m/z 75–466) [44]
Key Strengths	High throughput, UPLC compatibility, sensitivity, robust AGC [44]	Unparalleled resolution and mass accuracy, reduced spectral overlap [44]
Considerations	Larger datasets and compute demand [45]	Relatively slower acquisition rate, less common AGC [44]

This comparative data indicates that while FT-ICR MS can achieve superior mass accuracy, modern Orbitrap systems provide a balanced combination of high performance, robustness, and throughput that is highly suitable for the analysis of complex organic materials like paint binders and varnishes.

Advantages Over FTIR for Molecular Characterization

FTIR spectroscopy is a mainstay in art conservation for the identification of broad chemical classes (e.g., proteins, oils, resins) in paint binders and varnishes [6]. However, LC-Orbitrap MS/MS offers several complementary advantages:

• Unmatched Specificity: While FTIR identifies functional groups, HRAM MS can determine exact molecular formulas and, with MS/MS, elucidate specific chemical structures. This allows differentiation between triglycerides with different degrees of oxidation or saponification in oil paints, for instance.
• Superior Sensitivity: MS detection is exceptionally sensitive, capable of identifying trace-level degradation products, additives, or biomarkers that are undetectable by FTIR.
• Analysis of Complex Mixtures: LC separation coupled with high-resolution MS can deconvolute complex mixtures of organic materials without the need for extensive sample purification, a common challenge in the analysis of aged artistic materials.

Experimental Protocols

Sample Preparation from Art Substrates

The goal of sample preparation is to extract the target analytes (binders, varnishes) from the art substrate with minimal alteration to the original molecular composition.

• Micro-sampling: Using a scalpel under a microscope, carefully remove a minute sample (≈10-100 µg) from a non-essential area of the art object, such as the edge of a painting or from an existing crack or loss.
• Extraction: Transfer the sample to a low-volume microtube.
  • For proteins (e.g., egg, casein): Add 20-50 µL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer with 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Incubate at 60°C for 30 minutes. After cooling, add 10 µL of 20 mM iodoacetamide and incubate in the dark for 30 minutes. Finally, add 1 µg of sequencing-grade trypsin and incubate at 37°C for 4-16 hours.
  • For oils, resins, and gums (e.g., linseed oil, dammar, gum arabic): Add 50 µL of a suitable solvent (e.g., chloroform:methanol 2:1 v/v for lipids; aqueous methanol for gums). Sonicate for 15 minutes and then centrifuge at 13,000 × g for 5 minutes.
• Clean-up: Recover the supernatant. For complex extracts, pass through a micro-Solid Phase Extraction (µSPE) cartridge [46] or a low-adsorption centrifugal filter to remove particulate matter.
• QA Checkpoint: Include procedural blanks and, if available, a standard reference material of a known paint binder processed alongside the unknown samples to monitor contamination and preparation efficacy [45].

LC-Orbitrap MS/MS Analysis

The following method is designed for the Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Exploris series of mass spectrometers but is adaptable to other models.

Table 2: Standard LC and MS Method Parameters for Binder Analysis

Parameter	Setting	Rationale
LC Column	C18 (e.g., 2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7 µm) [45]	Broad suitability for hydrophobic (oils, resins) and peptide analytes.
Mobile Phase	A: Water/0.1% Formic Acid; B: Acetonitrile/0.1% Formic Acid	Standard reversed-phase solvents; acid enhances [M+H]+ ionization.
Gradient	5% B to 95% B over 25 min, hold 5 min.	Effective separation of a wide polarity range.
Flow Rate	0.3 mL/min	Optimal for ESI sensitivity and column performance.
Ion Source	H-ESI II [46]	Robust electrospray source for a wide range of flow rates.
Ionization Mode	Positive & Negative Polarity Switching	Comprehensive detection of diverse molecule types (lipids, peptides, acids).
Spray Voltage	3.5 kV (Positive), 3.0 kV (Negative)	Standard values; optimize for specific source.
Capillary Temp	320°C	Aids desolvation.
Mass Analyzer	Orbitrap	For HRAM data collection.
Resolution	240,000 @ m/z 200 [46]	High resolution to separate isobaric interferences.
Mass Range	m/z 100-2000	Covers most peptides, lipids, and small organic molecules.
AGC Target	1 x 10^5 [44]	Balances sensitivity and quantitative dynamic range.
MS/MS	Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA)	Automatically fragments top N most intense ions.
Fragmentation	HCD at 25-35 eV [46]	Higher-energy collisional dissociation generates informative fragments.

QA Checkpoint: Prior to sample analysis, inject a system suitability standard (e.g., a solution of standard peptides or lipids) to verify mass accuracy is within 1-3 ppm and chromatographic performance is stable [45].

Data Processing and Analysis Workflow

Diagram 1: Data analysis workflow for molecular identification.

• Chromatographic Processing: Use software (e.g., Thermo Scientific BioPharma Finder [47] or analogous) to detect peaks, deisotope spectra, and align features across multiple samples.
• Molecular Formula Assignment: For precursor ions, generate candidate elemental formulas using the measured accurate mass (< 3 ppm error is a typical filter) and the isotopic abundance pattern [44]. Apply heuristic rules (e.g., limits on element counts, Ring Double Bond Equivalents) to reduce false candidates.
• Structural Elucidation: Interrogate MS/MS spectra for diagnostic fragment ions. For example, in triglyceride analysis, fragments correspond to specific fatty acid chains (e.g., m/z 279 for oleic acid). For peptides, perform a database search against protein sequences of likely binders (e.g., chicken ovalbumin for egg).
• Validation: Confirm identifications by comparing retention times and fragmentation spectra with authentic standards, where available.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for LC-Orbitrap MS/MS Characterization

Item	Function / Application
Trypsin, Sequencing Grade	Proteolytic enzyme for digesting proteinaceous binders (egg, casein) into peptides for confident LC-MS/MS identification.
Ammonium Bicarbonate Buffer	A volatile buffer used during protein digestion; it is easily removed prior to LC-MS analysis to prevent ion suppression.
Stable-Isotope Labeled Internal Standards	Added to samples to correct for matrix effects and losses during preparation, improving quantitative accuracy [45].
FlexMix Calibration Solution	Used for one-click mass calibration of the Orbitrap mass detector, ensuring sustained sub-ppm mass accuracy [46].
µSPE (micro-Solid Phase Extraction) Cartridges	For clean-up of complex extracts to remove salts, pigments, and other interferents, reducing matrix effects [46].
Chromeleon Chromatography Data System (CDS)	Software for comprehensive instrument control, data processing, and management, providing compliance-ready features for regulated labs [47].
BioPharma Finder Software	An intuitive platform for biotherapeutic characterization, supporting intact mass analysis, peptide mapping, and oligonucleotide analysis workflows [47].

Application in Art Conservation: From FTIR to Detailed MS Characterization

The synergy between FTIR and LC-Orbitrap MS/MS can be visualized and implemented as a tiered analytical strategy.

Diagram 2: Integrated analytical strategy from FTIR to LC-MS/MS.

Case Example: Analysis of a Historical Paint Stratum FTIR analysis of a micro-sample may indicate the presence of a proteinaceous binder and a terpenoid varnish [6]. This information then guides the subsequent LC-Orbitrap MS/MS analysis:

• A portion of the sample is subjected to proteomic sample preparation (denaturation, reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion).
• The resulting peptide mixture is analyzed by LC-Orbitrap MS/MS. The HRAM data allows for specific identification of the protein source (e.g., rabbit skin glue versus egg yolk) based on the unique peptide sequences detected [47].
• Another portion of the sample is solvent-extracted for lipid/resin analysis. LC-Orbitrap MS in negative ion mode can profile diterpenoid acids (e.g., from pine resin) or triterpenoid acids (e.g., from dammar), while also detecting and identifying specific oxidation products (e.g., oxo- and hydroxy- derivatives of abietic acid) that indicate the state of varnish degradation.

This workflow moves beyond the generic "protein and resin" identification from FTIR to a detailed molecular map, providing conservators with specific material identifications crucial for developing historically appropriate and chemically compatible cleaning and consolidation strategies.

The integration of LC-Orbitrap MS/MS into the analytical pipeline for art conservation research provides a powerful capability for detailed molecular characterization that directly complements and extends the information obtained from FTIR spectroscopy. The protocols and workflows detailed in this application note offer a robust framework for researchers to identify specific molecular species within complex and precious cultural heritage samples. By leveraging the high resolution, accurate mass, and MS/MS capabilities of the Orbitrap platform, scientists can progress from general chemical class assignments to precise identifications of proteins, lipids, and resins, thereby generating a deeper understanding of artistic materials and their aging processes, which is fundamental to their preservation.

Correlating FTIR with Multispectral Imaging and pXRF for Comprehensive Analysis

The comprehensive analysis of paint materials in art conservation research requires a multifaceted approach, as no single analytical technique can fully characterize both the organic and inorganic components of complex artistic formulations. This protocol details the methodology for the integrated use of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, multispectral imaging (MSI), and portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry to provide a complete material profile of paint binders, varnishes, and pigments.

The correlation of these techniques is particularly valuable within thesis research focused on FTIR analysis of paint binders and varnishes, as it enables the contextualization of molecular vibrational data within elemental distribution maps and wide-area pigment identification. This integrated approach addresses a critical gap in conservation science by allowing researchers to correlate binder composition with pigment distribution across entire artworks, moving beyond point-based analysis to achieve holistic material characterization [48] [49].

Theoretical Background and Principles

Each analytical technique in this correlated approach provides complementary information about paint composition:

• FTIR Spectroscopy probes molecular vibrations to identify organic functional groups in binders (acrylic, alkyd, oil) and varnishes (natural resins, synthetic polymers) [50]. It provides both qualitative identification and, through calibration curves, quantitative assessment of binder concentrations in paint mixtures [50].

• Multispectral Imaging (MSI) captures reflectance images across specific spectral bands from ultraviolet to infrared, enabling pigment mapping across entire surfaces based on their spectral signatures [51] [52]. MSI systems typically acquire images with bandwidths of tens to hundreds of nanometers, generating data cubes where each pixel contains reflectance information [51].

• Portable XRF (pXRF) provides elemental composition data through X-ray fluorescence, enabling identification of inorganic pigments containing heavy elements (e.g., Hg in vermilion, Pb in lead white, Cu in azurite) [49] [36]. Modern pXRF instruments can perform analyses directly on artworks without sampling [53].

The synergy between these techniques creates a comprehensive analytical framework where MSI and pXRF identify and map pigment distributions, while FTIR characterizes the binding media that encapsulates these pigments, providing crucial information about the paint system as a whole.

Experimental Protocols

Equipment and Materials

Table 1: Essential Research Equipment and Specifications

Equipment Category	Specific Instrumentation	Key Technical Specifications	Primary Application
FTIR Spectrometer	ATR-FTIR with diamond crystal	Spectral range: 4000-400 cm⁻¹; Resolution: 4 cm⁻¹	Binder/varnish identification and quantification
Multispectral Imaging System	Modified DSLR or scientific camera	330-1200 nm range; 8-12 interference filters [51] [54]	Wide-area pigment mapping and visualization
pXRF Analyzer	Handheld XRF with Rh tube	4W X-ray tube; Multiple voltage settings (15-50 kV) [53]	In-situ elemental analysis for pigment identification
Reference Materials	Pigment and binder standards	Known concentration reference samples [50]	Calibration curves and method validation

Sample Preparation Protocols

Reference Sample Preparation

For quantitative FTIR analysis, prepare reference samples with known pigment-to-binder ratios:

• Weigh precisely pure pigments (ultramarine blue, chromium oxide green, cadmium sulfide) and binders (acrylic Plextol D498, alkyd Medium 4) [50]
• Mix components thoroughly in defined ratios (e.g., 1:2, 1:1, 2:1 pigment-to-binder by weight)
• Apply uniformly on inert substrates (glass slides, aluminum panels)
• Condition samples at standard temperature and humidity (21°C, 50% RH) for 24 hours before analysis

Artwork Preparation

• Surface examination under low-angle raking light to document topography
• Selection of analysis points representing all color areas and potential binder variations
• Stabilization of environmental conditions (50% RH, 21°C) to minimize spectral drift

Data Acquisition Procedures

FTIR Spectroscopy Protocol

• Background collection using clean ATR crystal before each sample measurement
• Sample placement ensuring firm, uniform contact with ATR crystal
• Spectral acquisition with 32 scans at 4 cm⁻¹ resolution across 4000-400 cm⁻¹ range
• Quality verification checking for saturation and sufficient signal-to-noise ratio
• Replicate measurements (minimum n=3) for statistical validation

Table 2: Characteristic FTIR Bands for Paint Binders and Varnishes

Binder/Varnish Type	Key FTIR Absorptions (cm⁻¹)	Band Assignment	Quantitative Peak Options
Acrylic (Plextol D498)	2955-2874, 1726, 1450, 1237-1144	C-H stretch, C=O stretch, C-H bend, C-O-C stretch	1726 cm⁻¹ (C=O stretch)
Alkyd Medium 4	2925-2854, 1720, 1250, 1114, 747-709	C-H stretch, C=O stretch (oil/phthalate), C-O-C stretch, aromatic bending	1720 cm⁻¹ (C=O stretch)
Drying Oil (Linseed)	2925-2853, 1740-1720, 1160, 1098	C-H stretch, C=O stretch, C-O stretch	1740-1720 cm⁻¹ (C=O stretch)
Natural Resin (Dammar)	2925-2870, 1725, 1385, 1235, 1172	C-H stretch, C=O stretch, C-H bend, C-O stretch	1725 cm⁻¹ (C=O stretch)

Multispectral Imaging Protocol

• Camera setup using modified DSLR with removed IR-cut filter and color filter array [51]
• Filter selection employing 8-12 interference filters covering visible to near-IR (400-1000 nm)
• Illumination control using standardized lighting at 45° angle to minimize specular reflection
• Spectral calibration using standard reflectance targets (Spectralon)
• Image capture maintaining fixed camera position and focus while cycling through filters
• Image registration aligning all spectral bands to correct for minor shifts

pXRF Analysis Protocol

• Instrument calibration using manufacturer-supplied standards
• Parameter optimization selecting voltage (15-50 kV) and current based on target elements [53]
• Measurement positioning ensuring consistent contact with analysis points
• Spectrum acquisition with adequate live time (30-60 seconds) for sufficient counts
• Replicate analyses (minimum n=3) at each point for precision

Data Integration and Correlation Methodology

The correlation of datasets follows a sequential process:

• Elemental mapping from pXRF identifies inorganic pigment distributions
• Spectral reflectance from MSI maps pigment locations based on optical properties
• Molecular characterization from FTIR identifies binders and organic components
• Data fusion using statistical methods (PCA) integrates all datasets [48]

Data Analysis and Interpretation

FTIR Quantitative Analysis

For binder quantification, establish calibration curves using reference samples:

• Identify characteristic peaks for each binder (Table 2)
• Integrate peak areas using consistent baseline correction
• Plot area vs. concentration to generate calibration curves
• Calculate unknown concentrations from calibration equations

Table 3: Quantitative Results for Binder-Pigment Mixtures (Example Data from Reference [50])

Pigment-Binder System	Nominal Ratio (Pigment:Binder)	FTIR Measured Ratio	Accuracy (%)	Preferred Quantification Peak (cm⁻¹)
PG18 + Acrylic	1:2	1:1.95	97.5	1726 (C=O stretch)
PG18 + Acrylic	1:1	1:0.98	98.0	1726 (C=O stretch)
PG18 + Acrylic	2:1	2:1.03	98.5	1726 (C=O stretch)
PB29 + Alkyd	1:2	1:1.92	96.0	1720 (C=O stretch)
PB29 + Alkyd	1:1	1:0.97	97.0	1720 (C=O stretch)
PB29 + Alkyd	2:1	2:1.05	97.5	1720 (C=O stretch)

MSI and pXRF Data Correlation

Correlate pigment identification from MSI and pXRF:

• Compare spatial distributions of elements (pXRF) with reflectance features (MSI)
• Validate pigment assignments through consistent results from both techniques
• Identify discrepancies that may indicate mixtures or layered structures

Integrated Data Interpretation

The final interpretation combines all datasets:

• Binder-pigment relationships identified through spatial correlation of FTIR and pigment maps
• Technique limitations acknowledged (e.g., pXRF cannot detect organic pigments, FTIR has limited spatial resolution)
• Conservation implications derived from complete material understanding

Applications in Art Conservation Research

This correlated methodology provides substantial benefits for thesis research focused on FTIR analysis of binders and varnishes:

• Contextualization of binder analysis within broader material context
• Identification of modern materials including synthetic binders and pigments [50]
• Detection of restoration campaigns through material inconsistencies
• Informed conservation decisions based on comprehensive material understanding
• Authentication studies through material chronology and anachronisms

The approach has been successfully applied to study works by Old Masters [48] [52] as well as modern and contemporary artists [53] [50], demonstrating its versatility across historical periods and artistic techniques.

Troubleshooting and Quality Control

Common Technical Issues

• FTIR spectral quality: Ensure proper ATR crystal contact and clean background measurements
• MSI misregistration: Use fixed camera position and software alignment tools
• pXRF elemental overlaps: Employ multiple excitation voltages to resolve interferences

Validation Procedures

• Analyze reference materials with known composition to verify accuracy
• Perform replicate analyses to assess precision
• Cross-validate results between techniques for consistent material identification

Data Quality Metrics

Table 4: Acceptance Criteria for Analytical Data Quality

Technique	Quality Parameter	Acceptance Criteria	Corrective Action
FTIR	Signal-to-Noise Ratio	>100:1 (peak-to-peak)	Increase scans or contact pressure
FTIR	Absorbance Linearity	R² > 0.99 for calibration	Check baseline correction method
MSI	Image Registration	< 2 pixel displacement	Re-align using control points
MSI	Spectral Consistency	< 5% variation in standards	Re-calibrate with reflectance target
pXRF	Count Rate	> 1000 cps (total)	Increase measurement time or voltage
pXRF	Elemental Detection	3σ above background	Optimize voltage for target elements

This comprehensive protocol enables robust correlation of FTIR with multispectral imaging and pXRF, providing researchers with a powerful methodological framework for the comprehensive analysis of paint materials in art conservation research.

Conclusion

FTIR spectroscopy remains an indispensable, versatile tool in the art conservator's analytical toolkit, capable of everything from rapid, non-invasive screening with portable units to detailed molecular characterization in the laboratory. Its power is significantly enhanced when used in a multi-analytical framework, cross-validated with techniques like Py-GC-MS and O-PTIR. Future directions point toward increased portability, higher spatial resolution breaking the diffraction limit, and the development of extensive spectral libraries. These advancements will further enable conservators to make ethically sound, scientifically-grounded decisions for the preservation of cultural heritage, ensuring that treatments are both effective and minimally invasive for paintings and historical objects worldwide.

References

• 1. Microspectroscopy in Art Conservation - Advancing Materials [https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/materials/microspectroscopy-in-art-conservation/]
• 2. Application of Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy ... [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-05819-7_1]
• 3. Material survey in the modern and contemporary ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386142525009588]
• 4. FT-NIR Spectroscopy for the Non-Invasive Study of Binders ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8914679/]
• 5. Scientific Analysis of Fine Art with FTIR [https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/materials/scientific-analysis-of-fine-art-with-ftir/]
• 6. Handheld FTIR Analysis for the Conservation and ... [https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/handheld-ftir-analysis-conservation-and-restoration-fine-art-and-historical-objects]
• 7. fourier transform infrared spectral analysis of natural resins ... [https://cool.culturalheritage.org/jaic/articles/jaic28-01-004.html]
• 8. Application of ATR-far-infrared spectroscopy to the analysis ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21069299/]
• 9. Differentiation between copal and amber by their structure ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-023-12333-8]
• 10. FTIR spectroscopy and multivariate discriminant analysis ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824023304]
• 11. Rejuvenation of bituminous RAP mastics: an FTIR-based ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02795-7]
• 12. Look but don't touch: Non-invasive chemical analysis of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267024010523]
• 13. Recent advances and applications to cultural heritage using ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/an/d2an00005a]
• 14. Non-invasive identification of paint binders in illuminated ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-019-0249-y]
• 15. Reflectance FTIR for Paint Analysis [https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=21787]
• 16. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and quantitative multivariate ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386142514008385]
• 17. FTIR Analysis of Coated Papers [https://cool.culturalheritage.org/coolaic/sg/bpg/annual/v08/bp08-01.html]
• 18. Non-invasive identification of polymers in cultural heritage ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-019-0336-0]
• 19. Surface analysis characterisation of gum binders used in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433215031670]
• 20. Database of diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12283775/]
• 21. 4300 Handheld FTIR Spectrometer [https://www.agilent.com/en/product/molecular-spectroscopy/ftir-spectroscopy/ftir-compact-portable-systems/4300-handheld-ftir?srsltid=AfmBOooCrYM47Jm7I7KEhW3aaT82bRnvJL86CQORxDjOxG-hqatX3ZJR]
• 22. Quantitative Mineral Analysis by FTIR Spectroscopy [https://www.irdg.org/ijvs/ijvs-volume-5-edition-1/quantitative-mineral-analysis-by-ftir-spectroscopy]
• 23. Advantages of External Reflection and Transflection over ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8878977/]
• 24. A non-invasive screening study of varnishes applied to ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-019-0327-1]
• 25. Benefits of applying combined diffuse reflectance FTIR ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003267008017510]
• 26. Database of diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-025-05948-3]
• 27. Analysis of a varnish applied by Nicéphore Niépce to make ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1296207410000154]
• 28. unravelling historical and artist applied varnish layers in ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01758-5]
• 29. FT-NIR Spectroscopy for the Non-Invasive Study of Binders ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/2052]
• 30. Mini-Tutorial: Cleaning Up the Spectrum Using ... [https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/mini-tutorial-cleaning-up-the-spectrum-using-preprocessing-strategies-for-ft-ir-atr-analysis]
• 31. Clean the ATR crystal - Thermo Fisher Knowledge Base [https://knowledge1.thermofisher.com/Molecular_Spectroscopy/Molecular_Spectroscopy_Software/OMNIC_Family/Affirma_with_OMNIC_Paradigm_Software/269-3637_Revision_A_Nicolet_Summit_X_HATR_Quick_Start_Guide/Clean_the_ATR_crystal]
• 32. Comparison of ATR–FTIR and O-PTIR Imaging Techniques ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9572732/]
• 33. The Application of FTIR-Microscopy to the Analysis of Paint ... [https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/research/research-resources/technical-bulletin/the-application-of-ftir-microscopy-to-the-analysis-of-paint-binders-in-easel-paintings]
• 34. Sub-micron IR spectroscopy / O-PTIR [https://www.stinstruments.com/chemical-analysis/ir-spectroscopy/sub-micron-ir-spectroscopy/]
• 35. Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Super-Resolution Imaging of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3272504/]
• 36. Review of in-situ non- and micro-destructive techniques for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-025-01675-1]
• 37. Kubelka–Munk theory - Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kubelka%E2%80%93Munk_theory]
• 38. The Interpretation of Diffuse Reflectance Spectra - PMC [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293523/]
• 39. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_reflectance_spectroscopy]
• 40. Research into physicochemical changes in the retouching ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-025-01720-z]
• 41. Spectroscopic techniques and the conservation of artists ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/BMCs40494-014-0025-y]
• 42. FTIR Analysis [https://rtilab.com/techniques/ftir-analysis/]
• 43. How Does FTIR Analysis Work? [https://www.innovatechlabs.com/newsroom/672/stuff-works-ftir-analysis/]
• 44. Comparison of High-Resolution Fourier Transform Mass ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8590398/]
• 45. - LC Explained: Principles, Platforms, and... | MetwareBio MS [https://www.metwarebio.com/understanding-lc-ms-workflow-types-applications/]
• 46. Orbitrap LC-MS Comparison Chart [https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/industrial/mass-spectrometry/liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry-lc-ms/lc-ms-systems/orbitrap-lc-ms/orbitrap-lc-ms-comparison-chart.html]
• 47. Exploris MX Mass Detector | Thermo Fisher Scientific - RU Orbitrap [https://www.thermofisher.com/ru/ru/home/industrial/mass-spectrometry/liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry-lc-ms/lc-ms-systems/orbitrap-lc-ms/orbitrap-exploris-mass-spectrometers/orbitrap-exploris-mx.html]
• 48. Integration of multispectral visible-infrared imaging and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X1932569X]
• 49. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) on painted heritage objects [https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-024-01135-2]
• 50. Pigment and Binder Concentrations in Modern Paint ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6032916/]
• 51. Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imaging [https://mci.si.edu/multispectral-and-hyperspectral-imaging]
• 52. Multispectral Imaging of Paintings in the Infrared to Detect ... [https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/11413/chapter/10]
• 53. A Different Kind of Art Analysis [https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/a-different-kind-of-art-analysis]
• 54. Multispectral Imaging (MSI) [https://chsopensource.org/services/multispectral-imaging-msi/]