AGREE Metric: A Comprehensive Guide to Comparative Greenness Assessment in Analytical Method Development

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive examination of the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric, a sophisticated tool for evaluating the environmental impact of analytical methods. Tailored for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, it explores AGREE's foundation in the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry, its practical application methodology, troubleshooting common implementation challenges, and comparative validation against other assessment tools. Through case studies from pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, we demonstrate how AGREE facilitates the selection and optimization of environmentally sustainable analytical procedures while maintaining methodological rigor, supporting the integration of green chemistry principles into analytical practice and regulatory frameworks.

Understanding AGREE: The Foundation of Modern Green Analytical Assessment

The Evolution of Green Analytical Chemistry and the Need for Robust Metrics

The field of analytical chemistry is undergoing a significant paradigm shift, aligning itself with the principles of sustainability science. This transformation is driven by a growing recognition of the environmental impact of analytical activities, which traditionally rely on energy-intensive processes, non-renewable resources, and waste-generating procedures [1]. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a dedicated subfield to mitigate the adverse effects of analytical procedures on the environment and human health [2] [3]. While the foundational principles of GAC provide a crucial framework, the practical implementation and comparison of green methods require robust, standardized evaluation tools. The proliferation of greenness assessment metrics has created a need for critical comparison and guidance on their application, particularly for researchers and drug development professionals seeking to make environmentally conscious choices [4] [5]. This guide focuses on the comparative evaluation of these assessment tools, with special emphasis on the AGREE metric (Analytical GREEnness metric), within the broader context of pharmaceutical analysis.

The Landscape of Greenness Assessment Metrics

The development of metric tools for evaluating the greenness of analytical methods has evolved significantly from simple, early models to sophisticated, multi-criteria calculators. The earliest tools, like the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), provided a basic pictogram with four criteria, offering a quick, qualitative glance at a method's environmental performance [3] [5]. However, their simplicity also constituted a major limitation, as they failed to provide quantitative scores and could not differentiate effectively between methods with similar profiles [4].

Subsequent metrics introduced semi-quantitative and quantitative scoring systems. The Analytical Eco-Scale assigns penalty points for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, and waste, with an ideal green analysis scoring 100 points [3] [6]. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) expanded the assessment scope with a detailed pictogram that evaluates the entire analytical process across multiple stages, from sample collection to final determination [7] [4].

The most recent generation of metrics, including AGREE and AGREEprep, leverages digital calculators to integrate the 12 principles of GAC, offering a comprehensive, quantitative, and visually intuitive output [8] [9]. These tools represent a move towards more holistic and user-friendly assessments, though challenges regarding subjectivity and standardization remain [5].

Table 1: Overview of Key Greenness Assessment Tools

Metric Tool	Type of Output	Scoring Range	Number of Criteria	Key Characteristics	Primary Application
NEMI [3] [4]	Pictogram (Qualitative)	Binary (Green/Blank)	4	Simple, quick visual check; limited discrimination.	General analytical methods
Analytical Eco-Scale [3] [6]	Numerical Score	0 to 100 (Higher=Greener)	Not fixed (Penalty points)	Semi-quantitative; penalizes hazardous practices.	General analytical methods
GAPI [7] [4]	Pictogram (Semi-Quantitative)	3-color levels per criterion	~15	Comprehensive lifecycle view; complex to apply.	General analytical procedures
AGREE [4] [9]	Pictogram & Numerical Score	0 to 1 (Higher=Greener)	12 (One per GAC principle)	Comprehensive, automated, user-weighted, open-source.	General analytical procedures
AGREEprep [8]	Pictogram & Numerical Score	0 to 1 (Higher=Greener)	10 (One per GSP principle)	Specific to sample preparation; addresses critical data gaps.	Sample preparation methods
BAGI [7] [5]	Numerical Score & Color Code	Not specified (Higher=Better)	Not specified	Assesses practicality and applicability, complementing greenness.	General analytical methods

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Metrics in Pharmaceutical Applications

Case Study: Assessment of Chromatographic Methods for Cilnidipine

A 2024 study directly compared six greenness assessment tools—GAPI, AGREE, Analytical Eco-Scale, ChlorTox Scale, BAGI, and RGB 12—to evaluate twelve chromatographic methods for the antihypertensive drug Cilnidipine (CLN) [7]. The research aimed to identify the greenest methods by quantifying environmental implications related to solvent use, energy consumption, and waste generation.

The study demonstrated that the choice of assessment tool could influence the final greenness ranking. However, methods that consistently scored high across multiple metrics shared common characteristics: miniaturized sample preparation, use of less toxic solvents, and strategies to reduce overall energy consumption and waste [7]. This comparative approach provides a more reliable and holistic view than relying on a single metric, allowing analysts to balance analytical efficiency with ecological responsibility.

Case Study: Selection of Greenest Method for Hyoscine N-Butyl Bromide

Another comparative study evaluated 16 chromatographic methods for Hyoscine N-butyl bromide using NEMI, Eco-Scale, GAPI, and AGREE [4]. The findings were revealing:

• NEMI was the least effective, as 14 of the 16 methods had identical pictograms, offering poor discriminatory power.
• Eco-Scale and AGREE provided reliable numerical scores, though on different scales (0-100 and 0-1, respectively).
• AGREE was highlighted for its advantages in automation and for visually highlighting the weakest points in an analytical technique via its circular pictogram.
• GAPI provided a fully descriptive, three-colored pictogram but was noted to be more complex to apply than Eco-Scale or AGREE [4].

The authors concluded that using multiple assessment tools is crucial for a confident evaluation of greenness and strongly recommended the application of these tools during the method development phase itself, rather than as a post-hoc assessment [4].

Experimental Protocol for Comparative Greenness Assessment

For researchers aiming to conduct their own comparative greenness assessment, the following protocol, synthesized from the cited studies, provides a robust methodology.

1. Define Scope and Select Methods:

• Clearly define the analytical goal (e.g., determination of a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient).
• Identify a set of candidate analytical procedures (e.g., 5-10 HPLC methods with varying sample preparation, solvents, and detection) from the literature [7] [4].

2. Data Collection and Standardization:

• For each method, systematically extract data on all parameters required by the chosen metrics. Key data points include:
  • Sample Preparation: Type and volume of solvents, reagents, materials used, number of steps, energy consumption [8].
  • Separation & Detection: Instrument type (HPLC, UPLC), run time, mobile phase composition and flow rate, column dimensions, detector type [7] [3].
  • Waste: Total amount of waste generated per analysis, including its hazardousness [3].

3. Metric Calculation and Visualization:

• AGREE: Use the open-source software available at https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE. Input data corresponding to the 12 GAC principles. The software will generate a score between 0 and 1 and a circular pictogram [9].
• GAPI: Manually construct the GAPI pictogram by filling in the segments for each of the ~15 criteria based on the collected data, using green, yellow, or red to indicate performance [4].
• Analytical Eco-Scale: Start from a base score of 100 and subtract penalty points for the amount and hazard of reagents, energy consumption >0.1 kWh per sample, and waste generated [3] [6].
• NEMI: Check the four criteria (PBT chemicals, hazardous waste, corrosivity, waste volume) and fill the pictogram's quadrants if conditions are met [3].

4. Data Synthesis and Interpretation:

• Compile the scores and pictograms from all metrics into a comparative table.
• Identify methods that perform consistently well across multiple metrics as the most promising green alternatives.
• Use the output from tools like AGREE and GAPI to pinpoint specific areas (e.g., waste generation, toxicity of solvents) where a method has the greatest potential for improvement [4].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the key decision points in selecting and applying a greenness assessment tool.

The AGREE Metric: A Closer Look at a Modern Tool

The AGREE metric is designed to be a comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward assessment approach [9]. It translates the 12 principles of GAC into 12 evaluation criteria, each scored on a unified scale from 0 to 1. These scores are then integrated, with user-assigned weights, to produce a final overall score between 0 and 1, where 1 represents ideal greenness [4] [9].

The output is an intuitive circular pictogram with 12 sections, each representing one GAC principle. The color of each section (from red to green) and the final numerical score provide an easily interpretable snapshot of the method's environmental performance and its specific strengths and weaknesses [9]. The tool is open-source and automated, reducing subjectivity and increasing accessibility for the scientific community.

Table 2: The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles Underlying the AGREE Metric

Principle Number	Principle (SIGNIFICANCE Mnemonic)	Brief Explanation / Typical Assessment Focus
1	Select direct analytical technique	Minimize or eliminate sample preparation stages.
2	Integrate analytical operations and processes	Automate and combine steps like derivation & extraction.
3	Normalize or miniaturize the method	Reduce sizes of samples, solvents, and equipment.
4	Generate as little waste as possible and properly handle it	Quantify and classify waste for safe disposal.
5	Implement in-situ, real-time analysis	Move measurement to the sample source.
6	Choose safe, benign, biodegradable reagents	Avoid toxic, hazardous, or persistent chemicals.
7	Automate and miniaturize methods to reduce energy use	Optimize for lower energy consumption per sample.
8	Neglect derivatization to avoid extra steps and reagents	Simplify the analytical procedure.
9	Use multi-analyte or multi-parameter methods	Maximize information per single analysis.
10	Eliminate or replace toxic reagents	Substitute hazardous substances with safer alternatives.
11	Choose energy-efficient instrumentation	Prefer instruments with lower power demands.
12	Enable the use of renewable sources	Incorporate sustainable materials and energy.

The following diagram deconstructs the output of the AGREE metric, explaining how to interpret its unique pictogram.

Engaging with green chemistry metrics requires familiarity with both conceptual tools and practical resources. The following table details key solutions and software that form the essential toolkit for a researcher in this field.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Greenness Assessment

Tool / Resource Name	Type	Primary Function in Assessment	Access Information
AGREE Calculator	Software	Automates the calculation and visualization of the greenness score based on the 12 GAC principles.	Free, open-source. Download from: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [9]
AGREEprep	Software / Metric	The first dedicated metric for evaluating the environmental impact of sample preparation methods based on 10 principles.	Tutorial available for guidance [8].
GAPI Pictogram	Graphical Metric	Provides a semi-quantitative visual profile of a method's greenness across its entire lifecycle.	Applied manually based on published templates [4].
Analytical Eco-Scale	Scoring System	Provides a semi-quantitative score by penalizing non-green practices related to reagents, energy, and waste.	Calculated manually using published penalty point criteria [3] [6].
NEMI Database	Database / Pictogram	Offers a quick, qualitative check of a method's compliance with four basic environmental criteria.	Access via http://www.nemi.gov [3]

The evolution of Green Analytical Chemistry from a conceptual framework to an actionable discipline is underpinned by the development and refinement of robust assessment metrics. While numerous tools exist, from the simple NEMI pictogram to the comprehensive AGREE calculator, no single tool is universally superior. The comparative analysis demonstrates that a multi-metric approach is often the most reliable strategy for selecting truly environmentally sustainable methods in pharmaceutical analysis and drug development [7] [4].

Future advancements in these metrics will likely focus on reducing subjectivity, incorporating uncertainty estimates, and establishing standardized weighting protocols [5]. Furthermore, the distinction between mere greenness ("circularity") and broader "sustainability," which includes economic and social dimensions, presents a critical frontier for the field [1]. For today's researchers, understanding the strengths, limitations, and appropriate applications of these tools is essential for driving the paradigm shift towards analytical practices that are not only effective but also ecologically responsible.

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric represents a significant advancement in the assessment of environmental impact within analytical chemistry. As a comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward assessment approach, AGREE provides researchers with an easily interpretable and informative result that aligns directly with the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC). This methodology transforms complex environmental considerations into a unified scoring system, enabling scientists to evaluate and improve their analytical procedures systematically. The AGREE calculator, available as open-source software, has emerged as an essential tool for chemists and researchers committed to implementing greener laboratory practices and reducing the environmental footprint of analytical methods [10].

The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles: Core of the AGREE Framework

The AGREE metric system is built directly upon the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry, known by the acronym SIGNIFICANCE. Each principle is converted into a specific scoring criterion within the AGREE assessment, creating a direct correspondence between theoretical framework and practical evaluation [10].

Table 1: The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles and Their Implementation in AGREE

Principle Number	SIGNIFICANCE Principle	AGREE Implementation Approach
1	Select direct analytical techniques	Scores based on analysis type: remote sensing (1.0) to multi-step batch analysis (0.0)
2	Minimal sample size and number	Consumes sample size/number with equation transformation to 0-1 scale
3	In-line measurements preferred	Incorporates device location relative to sample and measurement type
4	Eliminate derivatization	Binary assessment with penalty for derivatization steps
5	Automation and miniaturization	Favors automated, miniaturized, on-line, and at-line methods
6	Minimize waste and recycle	Quantifies waste amount with logarithmic transformation
7	Multi-analyte or multi-parameter	Assesses number of determined analytes/parameters
8	Minimize energy consumption	Calculates total energy demand with logarithmic transformation
9	Prefer renewable reagents	Evaluates reagent type, source, and biodegradability
10	Eliminate toxic reagents	Assigns scores based on reagent toxicity and safety data
11	Enhance operator safety	Consumes personal protective equipment requirements
12	Eliminate waste post-use	Addresses waste toxicity and environmental impact

The AGREE system transforms each of these principles into a quantitative score on a 0-1 scale, where 1 represents the greenest possible alternative and 0 indicates significant environmental concerns. This transformation enables direct comparison across different principles and facilitates the calculation of an overall greenness score [10].

AGREE Assessment Methodology and Protocol

The AGREE assessment process follows a standardized protocol that combines these 12 principle scores into a comprehensive environmental profile. The software generates a distinctive clock-like pictogram that visually represents the performance of an analytical procedure across all assessment criteria, with the overall score displayed in the center [10].

Calculation and Visualization

The final AGREE assessment result is calculated as the product of the assessment results for each principle, creating a comprehensive environmental profile. The output is presented as an intuitive clock-like graph where:

• The overall score (0-1) appears in the center, with values closer to 1 and dark green color indicating greener procedures
• Each segment corresponds to one of the 12 principles, colored with an intuitive red-yellow-green scale based on performance
• The width of each segment reflects the weight assigned to that principle by the user [10]

This visualization method allows for quick identification of both strengths and weaknesses in the analytical procedure's environmental profile.

Experimental Application Protocol

A recent study demonstrates the practical application of AGREE in evaluating sample preparation methods for tetracycline antibiotics analysis in food samples [11]. The experimental protocol followed these key steps:

• Method Identification: Researchers collected numerous analytical procedures published over the previous decade for tetracycline antibiotic determination in animal products (milk, eggs)

• Data Extraction: For each method, researchers documented key parameters corresponding to the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles, including:

  • Sample preparation steps and techniques
  • Sample size and number of samples required
  • Reagent types, volumes, and toxicity
  • Waste generation quantities
  • Energy consumption requirements
  • Operator safety considerations

• AGREE Evaluation: Input extracted data into the AGREE software, maintaining default weighting initially, then applying sensitivity analysis with different weighting scenarios

• Comparative Analysis: Compared AGREE results with other greenness assessment tools (NEMI, Eco-Scale, GAPI) to identify methodological strengths and limitations [11]

This protocol exemplifies how researchers can systematically apply the AGREE metric to evaluate and compare analytical methods in a specific application domain.

Comparative Analysis with Other Greenness Assessment Tools

AGREE occupies a distinctive position within the ecosystem of green analytical chemistry metrics. Unlike earlier assessment tools, it comprehensively addresses all 12 principles of GAC while offering both flexibility in weighting and intuitive visualization of results [10].

Table 2: Comparison of AGREE with Other Green Chemistry Assessment Metrics

Metric Tool	Number of Criteria	Scoring System	Key Advantages	Notable Limitations
AGREE	12 principles	0-1 continuous scale	Comprehensive coverage, flexible weighting, intuitive visual output	Requires detailed method data
NEMI	4 criteria	Binary (green/uncolored)	Simple pictogram, easy implementation	Limited criteria, binary assessment
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty-based	100-point scale (penalty subtraction)	Quantitative result, wider criteria than NEMI	Less comprehensive than AGREE
GAPI	More than NEMI	3-grade color scale	More criteria than NEMI, visual presentation	Less comprehensive than AGREE
RGB Model	3 categories	Additive color model	Includes analytical performance	Limited greenness criteria

The AGREE approach addresses several limitations of earlier metric systems, including the inclusion of only a few assessment criteria and their treatment as non-continuous functions. Previous systems like NEMI utilized a simple pictogram with four binary criteria, while the Analytical Eco-Scale assigned penalty points subtracted from a base of 100 [10].

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Implementing greener analytical methods through AGREE assessment often requires specific reagents and materials that align with the SIGNIFICANCE principles. The following table details key solutions mentioned in research applying AGREE to antibiotic analysis in food samples [11].

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function in Analysis	Green Chemistry Advantage
Biodegradable surfactants (e.g., rhamnolipids)	Extraction agents	Renewable, biodegradable alternatives to traditional surfactants
Natural sorbents	Sample preparation and purification	Sustainable, often biodegradable materials with minimal toxicity
Miniaturized extraction devices	Sample processing	Reduced reagent consumption and waste generation
Automated systems	Sample handling and analysis	Improved precision with reduced reagent use and operator exposure

The movement toward greener analytical procedures has driven innovation in reagent development, with significant efforts focused on improving the environmental profile of sample preparation methods, particularly for complex matrices like food samples [11].

AGREE Software Implementation and Output Interpretation

The AGREE calculator is available as open-source software, downloadable from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE, making the assessment procedure straightforward for researchers [10]. The software implementation follows a logical workflow that guides users through the assessment process.

When interpreting AGREE results, researchers should focus on identifying the weakest-performing principles (shown in red or yellow on the pictogram) as priority areas for methodological improvement. The ability to adjust weighting factors allows customization based on specific environmental priorities or regulatory requirements, making AGREE adaptable to diverse analytical scenarios and sustainability goals [10].

The AGREE metric successfully incorporates the 12 SIGNIFICANCE guidelines through a systematic approach that transforms each principle into a quantifiable score, combines them through a weighted calculation, and presents results in an intuitive visual format. This comprehensive framework addresses limitations of earlier assessment tools by evaluating all aspects of green analytical chemistry while maintaining flexibility for different user priorities and application requirements. As demonstrated in applications such as antibiotic testing in food samples, AGREE provides researchers with a practical methodology for evaluating and improving the environmental profile of analytical procedures, supporting the ongoing transition toward more sustainable laboratory practices throughout the scientific community.

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric represents a significant architectural advancement in the assessment of green analytical methods. Unlike its predecessors, AGREE incorporates a comprehensive set of twelve assessment criteria derived from the SIGNIFICANCE principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC) into a unified, visually intuitive scoring system [10]. This architecture was specifically designed to overcome the limitations of earlier metric systems, including their treatment of criteria as non-continuous functions and their inclusion of only a limited number of assessment parameters [10]. The core innovation of AGREE lies in its sophisticated yet user-friendly approach that transforms complex environmental impact data into an easily interpretable clock-pictogram visualization, providing researchers and analytical chemists with a powerful tool for evaluating and comparing the greenness of analytical procedures.

The development of AGREE was motivated by the need for a more sensitive and informative metric tool that could comprehensively address the multifaceted nature of greenness in analytical chemistry [10]. Where previous systems like the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) and Analytical Eco-Scale offered limited perspectives, AGREE's architecture encompasses a broader spectrum of considerations including reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy consumption, operator safety, and procedural efficiency [10]. This systematic approach positions AGREE as an indispensable component in the evolving landscape of green analytical chemistry, particularly for drug development professionals seeking to align their methodologies with increasingly stringent environmental and safety standards.

Architectural Framework and Scoring System

Foundation in Green Analytical Chemistry Principles

The architectural framework of AGREE is firmly grounded in the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry, collectively known by the acronym SIGNIFICANCE [10]. Each principle is systematically transformed into a scored criterion using a sophisticated algorithm that normalizes diverse input parameters to a unified 0–1 scale, where higher values indicate superior greenness performance [10]. This transformation process represents a fundamental innovation in green metrics, as it accommodates input variables of different natures—binary, discrete, and continuous—within a single cohesive evaluation framework.

The scoring mechanism incorporates weighted assessment criteria, allowing users to assign different levels of importance to each principle based on specific analytical scenarios or priorities [10]. This flexibility is a critical architectural advantage, recognizing that not all assessment criteria hold equal significance across different analytical applications. For instance, methods designed for field analysis might prioritize portability and minimal sample treatment, while laboratory-based methods might emphasize waste reduction and energy efficiency. The AGREE system accommodates these varying priorities through its customizable weighting system, which visually communicates the assigned weights through varying segment widths in the resulting pictogram [10].

The Clock-Pictogram Visualization System

The most distinctive visual element of AGREE's architecture is its clock-like pictogram, which serves as an integrated dashboard displaying the overall greenness score alongside detailed performance metrics for each assessment criterion [10]. This innovative visualization system efficiently communicates complex multidimensional assessment data in a format that is immediately comprehensible, addressing the challenge of output simplicity that often ploys comprehensive assessment tools.

Table: AGREE Pictogram Interpretation Guide

Visual Element	Representation	Interpretation
Central Numerical Value	Overall greenness score	Value接近1和深绿色表示分析方法更绿色
Central Color	Overall greenness assessment	Dark green (high greenness) to red (low greenness)
Segment Colors	Performance per GAC principle	Red-yellow-green scale indicating criterion performance
Segment Widths	Weight assigned to each criterion	Wider segments indicate higher user-assigned weights

The architectural intelligence of this visualization system lies in its ability to simultaneously communicate three distinct dimensions of information: the overall assessment result, the performance breakdown across individual criteria, and the relative importance assigned to each criterion [10]. This multi-layered communication approach enables researchers to quickly identify both strengths and areas for improvement in their analytical methods, facilitating targeted optimization efforts. The integration of this visualization with freely available, open-source calculation software further enhances the practical utility of the AGREE system, making sophisticated greenness assessment accessible to a broad range of analytical professionals [10] [9].

Comparative Analysis with Alternative Green Metric Systems

Methodological Comparison of Assessment Approaches

When evaluated against other prominent green metric systems, AGREE's architectural innovations become particularly evident. The following comparative analysis examines how AGREE addresses limitations in previous approaches while introducing enhanced capabilities for comprehensive greenness evaluation.

Table: Comparative Analysis of Green Analytical Chemistry Metric Systems

Metric System	Assessment Basis	Scale Type	Number of Criteria	Output Visualization	Key Limitations
AGREE	12 SIGNIFICANCE principles	Continuous (0-1)	12	Clock-pictogram with central score	Requires specialized software
NEMI	4 environmental criteria	Binary	4	Quadrant pictogram	Limited criteria; binary assessment
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty points system	Subtract from base 100	Limited	Numerical score	Does not comprehensively cover GAC principles
GAPI	Environmental impact parameters	Three-grade (traffic light)	10	Pictogram with color segments	Limited criteria consideration
RGB Model	Greenness, performance, productivity	Additive color	Multiple	Color combination	Does not specifically address all GAC principles

The architectural superiority of AGREE is particularly evident in its comprehensive coverage of green analytical chemistry principles. While systems like NEMI employ a simple binary assessment of only four criteria and the Analytical Eco-Scale utilizes a penalty-based approach, AGREE systematically evaluates all twelve SIGNIFICANCE principles through a continuous scoring function [10]. This comprehensive approach ensures that critical aspects of greenness—including sample treatment, minimal sample size, reagent toxicity, worker safety, and energy consumption—are all incorporated into the assessment rather than being partially addressed as in earlier systems.

Analytical Performance and Sensitivity Assessment

A critical advantage of AGREE's architecture is its enhanced sensitivity in discriminating between analytical methods with subtle but meaningful differences in environmental impact. The continuous 0–1 scoring scale for each principle, combined with the customizable weighting system, enables finer differentiation between methods compared to the binary or limited-category approaches employed by earlier metrics [10]. This sensitivity is particularly valuable in drug development contexts, where researchers must often select between multiple validated methods with similar performance characteristics but differing environmental profiles.

The AGREE system also demonstrates architectural advantages in output clarity and information density. Where NEMI's simple quadrant pictogram provides only limited information and the RGB model combines greenness with other considerations, AGREE's clock-pictogram maintains a dedicated focus on environmental impact while providing detailed insights into specific areas of strength and weakness [10]. This dedicated yet detailed assessment approach makes AGREE particularly valuable for analytical chemists seeking to systematically improve the greenness of their methods through targeted modifications, as the visualization clearly indicates which principles require optimization attention.

Experimental Protocols for AGREE Implementation

Methodology for AGREE Assessment

The experimental implementation of AGREE follows a standardized protocol designed to ensure consistent and reproducible greenness assessments across different analytical methods and laboratories. The assessment process begins with comprehensive data collection regarding all aspects of the analytical procedure, including sample preparation requirements, reagent types and quantities, energy consumption parameters, waste generation volumes, and safety considerations [10]. This initial data gathering phase is critical, as the accuracy of the final assessment depends directly on the completeness and precision of these input parameters.

Following data collection, the assessment proceeds through a structured criterion evaluation process where each of the twelve SIGNIFICANCE principles is systematically scored according to established transformation algorithms [10]. For example, the first principle regarding direct analytical techniques and sample treatment employs a detailed scoring table that differentiates between remote sensing without sample damage (score = 1.00) and external sample pretreatment with multiple steps (score = 0.00), with intermediate scores for approaches such as non-invasive analysis (0.90), in-field sampling with direct analysis (0.85), and on-line analysis (0.70) [10]. Similar specialized scoring algorithms exist for each of the other principles, ensuring consistent application across different assessors and methodologies.

Software-Assisted Calculation and Visualization

The final experimental phase involves software-supported computation using the dedicated AGREE calculator, which is freely available as open-source software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [10] [9]. This software automates the transformation of input parameters into criterion scores, applies user-defined weighting factors, calculates the overall greenness score, and generates the characteristic clock-pictogram visualization. The automated nature of this process minimizes calculation errors and ensures consistent application of the scoring algorithms, while the open-source architecture promotes transparency and allows expert users to verify the underlying computations.

The experimental implementation benefits significantly from the software's ability to generate assessment reports alongside the pictogram visualization, providing detailed documentation of the assessment process and results [10]. This comprehensive output facilitates method comparison, supports regulatory submissions, and provides justification for environmental claims regarding analytical procedures. For drug development professionals, this documentation capability is particularly valuable when demonstrating compliance with increasingly stringent environmental regulations and corporate sustainability initiatives.

Visualization of AGREE's Architectural Framework

The following diagram illustrates the integrated architecture of the AGREE assessment system, highlighting the flow from input parameters through processing algorithms to final visualization:

AGREE System Architecture Flow

This architectural visualization demonstrates the systematic flow from diverse input parameters through specialized processing algorithms to the integrated output visualization. The transformation of principle-based assessments into normalized scores, followed by the application of customizable weighting factors, creates a robust framework for comprehensive greenness evaluation that addresses the multidimensional nature of environmental impact in analytical chemistry.

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Assessment

The practical implementation of AGREE and similar green assessment metrics requires specific research tools and resources. The following table details key solutions essential for conducting comprehensive greenness evaluations in analytical method development:

Table: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Greenness Assessment

Solution/Resource	Function in Greenness Assessment	Application Context
AGREE Software	Open-source calculator for score computation and pictogram generation	Automated greenness assessment and visualization
Reagent Toxicity Databases	Reference data for scoring Principle 3 (less hazardous chemicals)	Evaluation of reagent environmental impact
Energy Consumption Monitors	Measurement of instrument power requirements	Assessment of Principle 8 (energy minimization)
Waste Characterization Protocols	Standardized waste quantification and classification	Evaluation of Principle 4 (waste minimization)
Miniaturized Analytical Systems	Technology enabling reduced sample and reagent volumes	Addressing Principles 1 & 2 (direct analysis and miniaturization)

These research solutions represent critical infrastructure for implementing systematic greenness assessment in analytical chemistry. The AGREE software serves as the central integration point for data collected using the other solutions, transforming discrete measurements into a cohesive environmental impact assessment [10]. Particularly in pharmaceutical development contexts, these tools enable researchers to quantify and optimize the environmental profile of analytical methods alongside traditional performance parameters, supporting the industry's increasing commitment to sustainable practice.

The value of these research solutions extends beyond simple assessment to method optimization and development. By identifying specific principles where analytical methods underperform in greenness metrics, researchers can target their improvement efforts more effectively, focusing on aspects such as reagent substitution, waste stream reduction, or energy efficiency enhancements. This targeted optimization approach, supported by the architectural clarity of AGREE's output visualization, accelerates the development of truly sustainable analytical methods for modern drug development pipelines.

The growing emphasis on sustainability in analytical laboratories has driven the development of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and the tools needed to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods [12]. These assessment metrics provide a structured framework for quantifying the "greenness" of analytical procedures, enabling researchers to make informed decisions that minimize ecological footprints [13]. The evolution of these tools represents a progressive refinement in how the analytical community conceptualizes and measures environmental impact, moving from basic binary evaluations to sophisticated multi-parameter scoring systems.

The National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale, and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) represent significant milestones in this evolutionary pathway [13] [12]. Each was developed to address limitations in previous tools, with subsequent metrics incorporating more comprehensive criteria and providing more nuanced assessments. Understanding their comparative advantages is essential for researchers selecting appropriate assessment methods for specific applications, particularly in pharmaceutical development where analytical procedures are ubiquitous from discovery through quality control.

This article examines these three established metrics within the context of modern green chemistry assessment, focusing on their relative strengths, limitations, and appropriate applications. The evaluation is particularly relevant given the current trend toward comprehensive sustainability assessment frameworks like the White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept, which balances environmental concerns with analytical performance and practical applicability [14].

National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI)

NEMI stands as one of the earliest tools developed for assessing the greenness of analytical methods [12]. Its design employs a simple pictogram divided into four quadrants, each representing a different environmental criterion: (1) whether any persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals are used; (2) whether any corrosive reagents (pH <2 or >12) are employed; (3) whether any hazardous reagents are utilized; and (4) whether waste is properly treated [15] [12]. Each quadrant is colored green if the method meets the environmental criterion and remains blank if it does not, providing an immediate visual assessment of method greenness.

Despite its pioneering status, NEMI possesses significant limitations. It provides only a qualitative, binary assessment (green or blank) without gradations of performance [12]. The tool focuses exclusively on chemical hazards, neglecting energy consumption, sample collection, and other process-related environmental impacts [12]. Additionally, preparing the NEMI symbol requires consulting multiple regulatory lists to classify chemicals, which can be time-consuming for methods employing numerous reagents [12]. These limitations restrict NEMI's utility for comprehensive greenness assessment, though its simplicity remains advantageous for preliminary evaluations.

Analytical Eco-Scale

The Analytical Eco-Scale introduced a quantitative approach to greenness assessment through a penalty points system [12]. This tool begins with a baseline score of 100 points, from which penalties are subtracted for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, occupational hazards, and waste generation [15] [16]. The resulting numerical score categorizes methods as "excellent green" (score >75), "acceptable green" (score 50-75), or "inadequate green" (score <50) [6] [15]. This scoring system enables direct comparison between methods and identifies specific areas for improvement.

The Analytical Eco-Scale represents a significant advancement over NEMI through its incorporation of energy consumption and waste generation into the assessment framework [12]. However, it still exhibits limitations, including its failure to account for the varying severity of chemical hazard pictograms and its lack of visual impact compared to pictogram-based tools [17]. Despite these shortcomings, its quantitative nature makes it valuable for benchmarking and method optimization.

Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI)

GAPI emerged as a more comprehensive tool that evaluates the entire analytical methodology across multiple stages, from sample collection through final determination [12]. The assessment utilizes a five-segment pictogram where each segment represents a different aspect of the analytical process: sample collection, preservation, transportation, storage, and preparation; instrument method type; reagents and solvents used; instrumentation; and quantification method [12]. Each segment is colored green, yellow, or red according to the environmental impact, providing a detailed visual representation of a method's greenness profile.

GAPI's primary advantage lies in its comprehensive scope, addressing previously neglected aspects such as sample collection, preservation, and transportation [12]. By providing a more detailed breakdown of environmental impacts throughout the analytical lifecycle, GAPI enables researchers to identify specific process steps with the greatest environmental concerns. However, GAPI does not generate a composite numerical score, making direct method comparisons somewhat subjective [17]. This limitation has prompted recent developments like the Modified GAPI (MoGAPI), which adds a scoring system to the traditional GAPI assessment [17].

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of Assessment Metrics

Feature	NEMI	Analytical Eco-Scale	GAPI
Assessment Type	Qualitative	Quantitative	Semi-quantitative
Output Format	4-quadrant pictogram	Numerical score (0-100)	5-segment pictogram
Development Year	~2000 [12]	2006 [16]	2018 [12]
Key Criteria	PBT chemicals, corrosives, hazardous waste, treatment	Reagents, energy, waste, occupational hazards	Sample collection to final determination
Chemical Hazard Consideration	Limited to listed chemicals	Penalty points based on hazards	Comprehensive, with color coding

Comparative Experimental Assessment

Methodology for Metric Comparison

To objectively compare the performance of NEMI, Analytical Eco-Scale, and GAPI, we examined their application to chromatographic methods for determining sulfadiazine and trimethoprim in bovine meat and chicken muscles [15]. The assessment included three developed methods: HPLC-UV, Micellar Liquid Chromatography (MLC)-UV, and UPLC-MS/MS, which were specifically designed with green principles in mind [15]. Each method employed different approaches to reducing environmental impact, including solvent reduction, alternative separation mechanisms, and waste minimization.

The evaluation protocol required applying each assessment metric to all three methods according to their standard procedures. For NEMI, this involved checking all chemicals against regulatory lists and completing the pictogram quadrants. For Analytical Eco-Scale, penalty points were calculated for reagents, energy consumption, and waste generation. For GAPI, each step of the analytical process was evaluated against established criteria to color-code the five segments of the pictogram. The same methodology was applied to evaluate methods for determining cannabinoids in oils, where eight chromatographic methods were assessed using all four metrics (including AGREE) [6].

Results and Comparative Analysis

The application of these metrics to the chromatographic methods revealed significant differences in assessment outcomes and utility. In the sulfadiazine and trimethoprim analysis, the Analytical Eco-Scale provided clear quantitative differentiation between methods, with the UPLC-MS/MS method achieving the highest score (indicating superior greenness) due to its reduced solvent consumption and waste generation [15]. The GAPI assessment offered the most detailed breakdown of environmental impacts across the analytical lifecycle, visually highlighting specific advantages of the MLC-UV method in solvent greenness [15]. Meanwhile, NEMI provided only basic differentiation, with all methods showing similar pictograms that failed to capture significant environmental differences between the approaches [15].

In the cannabinoid in oils study, seven of eight methods achieved "acceptable" scores (50-73) on the Analytical Eco-Scale, while one method reached an "excellent" rating (80) [6]. The GAPI assessments provided more nuanced information, revealing that methods with similar Eco-Scale scores could have substantially different environmental impact profiles across the various stages of analysis [6]. This demonstrates GAPI's value in identifying specific areas for method improvement, even when overall scores are similar.

Table 2: Performance Comparison in Method Assessment

Assessment Aspect	NEMI	Analytical Eco-Scale	GAPI
Differentiation Power	Low	Moderate	High
Identification of Improvement Areas	Limited	Moderate	Comprehensive
User-Friendliness	High (simple)	Moderate	Moderate (complex)
Scope of Assessment	Narrow (chemicals only)	Moderate	Broad (full lifecycle)
Application to Method Development	Limited guidance	Useful for optimization	Comprehensive guidance

Graph 1: Evolution of Green Assessment Metrics. The development shows progression from basic to comprehensive tools, with GAPI serving as a foundation for modern derivatives.

Critical Analysis of Advantages and Limitations

Comparative Advantages of Each Metric

Each metric offers distinct advantages that make it suitable for specific applications. NEMI's primary strength lies in its simplicity and immediacy - the pictogram provides an instant visual assessment without complex calculations [12]. This makes it suitable for preliminary screening or educational purposes where detailed analysis is unnecessary. However, its binary assessment approach and limited scope render it inadequate for comprehensive environmental impact assessment or method optimization [12].

The Analytical Eco-Scale provides a significant advantage through its numerical scoring system, which enables unambiguous ranking of methods and tracking of improvement over time [15] [16]. The penalty point system directs attention to specific environmental concerns, making it particularly valuable for method development and optimization [15]. Its quantitative nature also facilitates incorporation into larger assessment frameworks and sustainability reporting [17].

GAPI's most significant advantage is its comprehensive lifecycle perspective, evaluating environmental impacts across the entire analytical process rather than focusing exclusively on chemical hazards [12]. By including sample handling, transportation, and instrumentation, it provides a more complete environmental profile than previous metrics [12]. The color-coded pictogram offers immediate visual identification of specific process steps with environmental concerns, guiding targeted improvements [12]. This comprehensive approach has established GAPI as one of the most widely used greenness assessment tools in analytical chemistry [17].

Recognized Limitations and Contemporary Solutions

Despite their advantages, all three metrics exhibit limitations that affect their utility in modern analytical chemistry. NEMI's oversimplification and failure to account for energy consumption, waste quantity, and occupational hazards make it inadequate for thorough environmental assessment [12]. The Analytical Eco-Scale has been criticized for not differentiating between the severity of different hazard pictograms when assigning penalty points [17]. It also lacks the visual impact of pictogram-based tools, making results less immediately accessible.

GAPI's most frequently cited limitation is its lack of a composite numerical score, which makes direct comparison between methods somewhat subjective and difficult to incorporate into quantitative decision-making frameworks [17]. This limitation has been addressed in recent modifications such as the Modified GAPI (MoGAPI), which adds a scoring system that classifies methods as "excellent green" (≥75), "acceptable green" (50-74), or "inadequately green" (<50) [17]. Similarly, ComplexGAPI has expanded the assessment to include processes performed prior to the analytical procedure itself [18].

The evolution beyond these three metrics continues with tools like AGREE, which incorporates weighting factors for different criteria, and the emerging White Analytical Chemistry framework, which balances environmental concerns with analytical performance and practical applicability [14]. These developments reflect the analytical community's ongoing effort to develop more sophisticated, balanced assessment approaches that address the multifaceted nature of sustainability in laboratory practice.

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for Greenness Assessment Research

Reagent/Material	Function in Research	Green Considerations
HPLC/UPLC Systems	Separation and quantification of analytes	Energy consumption, waste generation
Alternative Solvents	Replacing hazardous mobile phase components	Toxicity, biodegradability, sourcing
Micellar Media	Environmentally benign separation media	Reduced toxicity vs. organic solvents
Sample Preparation Materials	Extraction and concentration of analytes	Solvent consumption, waste generation
Reference Standards	Method validation and calibration	Responsible sourcing, waste disposal

The comparative analysis of NEMI, Analytical Eco-Scale, and GAPI reveals a clear evolutionary pathway in greenness assessment tools, with each successive metric addressing limitations of its predecessors while introducing new capabilities. NEMI established the foundation with its simple pictogram approach but offered limited practical utility for method optimization. The Analytical Eco-Scale introduced valuable quantification through its penalty points system but lacked comprehensive scope. GAPI provided the most complete lifecycle assessment with its detailed pictogram but suffered from the absence of a composite scoring system for straightforward method comparison.

For researchers and drug development professionals, metric selection should align with specific assessment needs. NEMI may suffice for basic educational purposes, while the Analytical Eco-Scale provides effective benchmarking for method optimization. GAPI offers the most comprehensive evaluation for complete environmental impact assessment, particularly when used with modified versions that incorporate scoring systems. The continuing evolution of these tools—exemplified by AGREE, ComplexGAPI, MoGAPI, and the White Analytical Chemistry framework—reflects the analytical community's growing sophistication in addressing sustainability challenges while maintaining analytical performance.

The growing emphasis on environmental sustainability within laboratory sciences has catalyzed the development of robust, quantitative tools for assessing the ecological footprint of analytical methods. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a critical discipline focused on minimizing the environmental impact of analytical procedures by reducing or eliminating hazardous substances, decreasing energy consumption, and minimizing waste generation [19] [20]. The transformation of complex environmental impact data into simple, quantifiable scores represents a significant scientific advancement, enabling researchers to objectively compare and select more sustainable methodologies.

The evolution of GAC metrics has progressed from basic binary tools to sophisticated multi-criteria assessment models [20]. Early tools like the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) offered simple pictograms based on four basic environmental criteria but lacked the granularity to distinguish degrees of greenness [20]. This limitation spurred the development of more comprehensive metrics that incorporate multiple environmental parameters and generate quantitative scores, providing researchers with a more nuanced understanding of method sustainability [21] [20]. These advanced metrics have become indispensable in the pharmaceutical industry, where analytical testing is ubiquitous throughout drug development and quality control processes.

Fundamental Principles of Green Metrics

Core Concepts and Terminology

Greenness assessment metrics in analytical chemistry are founded on well-defined environmental principles and standardized evaluation criteria. The 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (often abbreviated as SIGNIFICANCE) provide the foundational framework for most comprehensive assessment tools [21] [9]. These principles address critical aspects including reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy consumption, operator safety, and procedural efficiency. Similarly, the 10 principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP) offer specialized guidance for evaluating one of the most environmentally impactful stages of analytical workflows [19] [21].

Quantitative greenness scoring typically transforms these qualitative principles into numerical values through standardized algorithms. Most metrics generate scores on a normalized scale (e.g., 0-1 or 0-100), where higher values indicate superior environmental performance [19] [21] [20]. The complexity of these calculation methods varies significantly between tools, with some employing simple additive models while others incorporate weighted criteria based on relative environmental importance [19] [21]. This systematic approach to quantifying environmental parameters enables objective comparison of analytical methods and identifies specific areas for improvement.

The AGREE Metric System

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric represents a significant advancement in green assessment tools by incorporating all 12 principles of GAC into a unified evaluation framework [9]. This open-source software calculator transforms complex environmental parameters into a comprehensive pictogram with a central score between 0-1, accompanied by a segmented circular diagram that visualizes performance across each principle [20] [9]. The AGREE system emphasizes flexibility, allowing users to adjust weighting factors for different criteria based on their specific environmental priorities [9].

A key strength of the AGREE approach is its ability to provide both a quantitative overall score and qualitative visual feedback on specific environmental strengths and weaknesses [9]. This dual-output system helps researchers quickly identify which aspects of their analytical methods contribute most significantly to environmental impact and prioritize modifications accordingly. The metric's comprehensive nature and user-friendly software implementation have made it particularly valuable for drug development professionals seeking to justify method selection based on objective environmental criteria [20].

Comparative Analysis of Major Greenness Metrics

The landscape of greenness assessment tools has diversified considerably, with each metric employing distinct approaches to quantify environmental impact. The following table provides a systematic comparison of major metrics used in analytical chemistry:

Table 1: Comprehensive Comparison of Greenness Assessment Metrics

Metric Name	Assessment Scope	Scoring System	Visual Output	Key Advantages	Primary Limitations
NEMI [20]	General analytical methods	Binary (Yes/No for 4 criteria)	Pictogram with 4 quadrants	Simple, user-friendly	Lacks granularity; limited criteria
Analytical Eco-Scale [20]	General analytical methods	Penalty points subtracted from 100	Numerical score only	Quantitative; allows direct comparison	No visual component; subjective penalties
GAPI [20]	Entire analytical procedure	Qualitative (5-color scale)	Multi-colored pictogram	Comprehensive workflow coverage	No overall score; somewhat subjective
AGREE [9]	General analytical methods	0-1 scale	Circular diagram with segments & score	Comprehensive; combines score with visualization	Subjective weighting; limited pre-analytical coverage
AGREEprep [19]	Sample preparation only	0-1 scale	Circular diagram with 10 segments	Specialized for sample preparation; considers operator safety	Must be used with other tools for full method assessment
GEMAM [21]	Entire analytical assay	0-10 scale	Hexagonal diagram with 7 segments	Combines GAC and GSP principles; flexible weighting	Complex calculation process

Specialized Metric Applications

Beyond general-purpose assessment tools, specialized metrics have emerged to address specific analytical stages or environmental concerns. AGREEprep was developed exclusively for evaluating sample preparation procedures, which often represent the most environmentally impactful stage of analytical workflows [19]. This dedicated tool incorporates the 10 principles of Green Sample Preparation and employs a weighted scoring system that emphasizes critical factors like solvent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption [19].

Recent metric developments have addressed emerging environmental priorities, including climate impact assessment through tools like the Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), which estimates and encourages reduction of carbon emissions associated with analytical procedures [20]. The Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA) employs a star-shaped visualization to represent performance across multiple green criteria, with the total area offering direct visual comparison between methods [20]. The progression toward these specialized assessment tools reflects the growing sophistication of green chemistry evaluation and the need for metrics that address specific environmental concerns within drug development and analytical science.

Case Study: Comparative Metric Application

A case study evaluating a sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME) method for determining antiviral compounds demonstrated how complementary metrics provide a multidimensional sustainability assessment [20]. The method achieved moderate greenness scores across multiple metrics: MoGAPI (60/100), AGREE (0.56), AGSA (58.33), and CaFRI (60) [20]. This consistent scoring pattern across different assessment frameworks strengthens the validity of the environmental evaluation.

The multi-metric assessment revealed specific environmental trade-offs: the method benefited from miniaturization and avoided derivatization but was penalized for waste management deficiencies, reagent safety issues, and non-renewable energy sources [20]. This case study illustrates how employing complementary metrics provides a more comprehensive environmental profile than any single tool, enabling researchers to make more informed decisions about method selection and optimization [20].

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

AGREE Assessment Methodology

The AGREE metric employs a standardized protocol for converting analytical method parameters into a comprehensive greenness score. The assessment begins with data collection across twelve categories corresponding to the SIGNIFICANCE principles [9]. For each principle, the method is evaluated against specific criteria and assigned a score between 0-1, with higher scores indicating better environmental performance [9]. The software then applies user-defined weighting factors to each criterion, acknowledging that certain environmental aspects may be more critical in specific contexts [9].

The computational algorithm integrates these weighted scores using the following approach implemented in the open-source AGREE software [9]:

• Data Input: Analytical method parameters are entered for each of the 12 GAC principles
• Score Assignment: Each principle receives a normalized score (0-1) based on compliance with ideal green performance
• Weight Application: User-defined weights (default or custom) are applied to each principle
• Score Aggregation: The overall score is calculated using a weighted sum approach
• Pictogram Generation: The software produces a circular diagram with colored segments and a central composite score

This systematic methodology ensures consistent, reproducible greenness assessments that can be directly compared across different analytical methods and laboratories.

AGREEprep Assessment Protocol

AGREEprep implements a specialized assessment protocol focused exclusively on sample preparation procedures [19]. The methodology evaluates ten criteria derived from the principles of Green Sample Preparation, with default weights emphasizing the most environmentally significant factors [19]. The assessment procedure involves:

• Criteria Evaluation: Each of the ten GSP principles is scored based on method compliance
• Weight Application: Default or custom weights are applied (e.g., higher weights for solvent toxicity and waste generation)
• Score Calculation: The tool calculates an overall score between 0-1 using a weighted sum algorithm
• Pictogram Generation: A circular diagram with ten colored segments provides visual feedback on each criterion

AGREEprep's specialized focus enables more granular assessment of sample preparation techniques, identifying specific opportunities to improve sustainability in this critical analytical stage [19].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Key Reagent Solutions and Materials for Green Analytical Chemistry

Item Category	Specific Examples	Function in Analysis	Green Alternatives & Considerations
Extraction Solvents [19]	Dichloromethane, Chloroform, Hexane	Sample preparation, compound extraction	Bio-based solvents, water-based systems, solventless extraction
Solid-Phase Materials [19]	Silica-based sorbents, Polymer cartridges	Sample clean-up, compound separation	Sustainable, reusable, and renewable sorbent materials
Derivatization Reagents [21]	MSTFA, BSTFA, HFBA	Analyte chemical modification for detection	Avoidance of derivatization; greener reagents when necessary
Separation Materials [20]	HPLC columns, GC stationary phases	Compound separation before detection	Miniaturized systems; alternative separation techniques
Calibration Standards [21]	Certified reference materials	Instrument calibration, quantitation	In-house prepared standards; reduced material consumption

Conceptual Framework of Metric-Based Environmental Assessment

The transformation of complex environmental data into quantitative scores follows a systematic conceptual framework that can be visualized through the following logical workflow:

The scientific transformation of complex environmental impact data into quantitative scores represents a paradigm shift in how analytical methods are developed, evaluated, and selected in pharmaceutical research and other chemical industries. The progression from simple binary assessments to sophisticated multi-criteria metrics like AGREE, AGREEprep, and GEMAM has provided researchers with powerful tools to objectively quantify and compare the environmental footprint of analytical procedures [19] [21] [9].

These metrics have established a rigorous scientific basis for environmental assessment in analytical chemistry, enabling data-driven decisions that align with sustainability goals without compromising analytical performance. As green chemistry continues to evolve, the ongoing refinement of these assessment tools will further enhance their accuracy, comprehensiveness, and applicability across diverse analytical scenarios. For drug development professionals, these metrics provide a critical framework for demonstrating environmental responsibility while maintaining scientific rigor in analytical method development and validation.

Practical Implementation: Applying AGREE to Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Methods

The Analytical GREenness (AGREE) metric is a comprehensive assessment tool designed to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. Developed in 2020, this open-source calculator transforms the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry into a unified, easily interpretable result, providing both a numerical score (0-1) and an intuitive pictogram [9] [20]. The tool emerged in response to the limitations of earlier green chemistry assessment methods, which were often inadequate for properly evaluating analytical procedures. Unlike traditional metrics that focused on single aspects like solvent consumption, AGREE offers a holistic evaluation across multiple environmental dimensions, considering factors such as reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy requirements, and operator safety [20].

The AGREE metric fits within the broader context of the "triadic model" of analytical method assessment, which later evolved into white analytical chemistry - a framework that integrates environmental sustainability (green), methodological practicality (blue), and analytical performance (red) [20]. Among these dimensions, the green component served as the cornerstone for the sustainable transformation of analytical science, stimulating the development of numerous assessment tools. AGREE represents a significant advancement in this field due to its comprehensive coverage of green chemistry principles, user-friendly software implementation, and ability to facilitate direct comparisons between analytical methods [20].

Theoretical Foundation: The 12 Principles of GAC

The AGREE metric is firmly grounded in the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), which serve as the fundamental criteria for evaluation. These principles provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the environmental impact of analytical methods across all stages of the analytical process [20]:

• Direct analytical techniques that eliminate sample treatment
• Minimized sample size and reduced number of samples
• In-line measurements and portability for on-site analysis
• Integration of analytical processes and automation
• Elimination or reduction of reagent usage
• Reduction of energy consumption
• Use of renewable resources and biodegradable materials
• Multi-analyte or multi-parameter methods to maximize output
• Reagent replacement with safer alternatives
• Waste minimization and proper management
• Operator safety through risk assessment
• Elimination of derivatization to reduce procedural steps

Each principle in the AGREE assessment is transformed into a dedicated evaluation criterion with a standardized scoring system. The principles are weighted according to their relative environmental importance, and the scores are aggregated into a final result that reflects the method's overall environmental performance [9] [20]. This principled approach ensures that the assessment covers all critical aspects of green chemistry while maintaining scientific rigor and practical relevance for analytical practitioners.

The AGREE Assessment Methodology

Data Collection Requirements

Conducting a proper AGREE assessment requires systematic data collection across twelve specific categories corresponding to the GAC principles. The essential data requirements include:

• Reagent Information: Complete inventory of all chemicals, solvents, and materials used, including quantities, concentrations, and safety data (toxicity, flammability, environmental hazards)
• Energy Consumption: Power requirements of instruments, analysis time, and operational energy demands measured in kWh per sample
• Waste Generation: Type and volume of waste produced, including information on disposal methods, recycling procedures, and biodegradability
• Sample Preparation: Number of procedural steps, automation level, sample size, and any derivatization requirements
• Equipment Specifications: Instrument size, portability, dedicated energy consumption, and requirements for special conditions
• Operator Safety: Risk assessment data, exposure potential, and required personal protective equipment

For the SULLME case study evaluating antiviral compounds, researchers documented: use of green solvents alongside moderately toxic substances, solvent consumption of <10 mL per sample, small sample volume (1 mL), semiautomation, no derivatization steps, generation of >10 mL waste per sample without treatment, and throughput of two samples per hour [20].

Assessment Workflow

The AGREE assessment follows a structured, sequential process to ensure comprehensive and consistent evaluations. The workflow proceeds through specific stages from initial data gathering to final pictogram generation, with each stage building upon the previous one to transform raw methodological data into an actionable environmental assessment.

Scoring System and Algorithm

The AGREE calculator employs a sophisticated scoring algorithm that transforms input data into a comprehensive environmental assessment. The system operates on several key mechanisms:

• Normalized Scoring: Each of the 12 principles is scored on a normalized scale (0-1), where 0 represents the least environmentally friendly practice and 1 represents ideal green performance
• Weighted Aggregation: Individual principle scores are combined using a weighted sum, with weights reflecting the relative importance of each principle to overall environmental impact
• Pictogram Transformation: The numerical scores are visually represented in a circular diagram with 12 segments, where color intensity corresponds to performance level

The software employs specific algorithms to convert diverse input parameters (reagent volumes, toxicity levels, energy consumption) into comparable scores. For example, reagent toxicity is classified according to standardized hazard classifications and converted to penalty points, while energy consumption is evaluated relative to methodological alternatives. The final composite score is calculated using the formula:

AGREE Score = Σ(wi × si) / Σ(wi) where wi represents the weight assigned to principle i and si represents the score for principle i [20].

This computational approach allows the tool to generate consistent, reproducible assessments across different analytical methods and application domains, facilitating objective comparisons and trend analysis in environmental performance.

AGREE in Context: Comparison with Other Green Assessment Tools

Comparative Analysis of Green Metrics

The landscape of green analytical chemistry assessment includes multiple tools, each with distinct approaches, strengths, and limitations. This comparative analysis places AGREE within the broader ecosystem of environmental assessment metrics, highlighting its unique position as a comprehensive, user-friendly tool based on the foundational principles of GAC.

Table 1: Comparison of Major Green Analytical Chemistry Assessment Tools

Tool Name	Year Introduced	Assessment Scope	Scoring System	Key Features	Limitations
NEMI	Early 2000s	Basic compliance	Binary (pass/fail)	Simple pictogram; Easy interpretation	Limited discrimination; Narrow criteria [20]
Analytical Eco-Scale	2012	Penalty-based	Numerical (0-100)	Direct method comparison; Transparent scoring	Subjective penalties; No visual output [20]
GAPI	2018	Comprehensive workflow	Qualitative (color-coded)	Visual workflow identification; Detailed assessment	No overall score; Color subjectivity [20]
AGREE	2020	12 GAC principles	Numerical (0-1) + Pictogram	Comprehensive principles coverage; User-friendly software	Limited pre-analytical coverage; Subjective weighting [9] [20]
AGREEprep	2021	Sample preparation	Numerical (0-1) + Pictogram	Focuses on high-impact stage; Quantitative output	Requires complementary tools; Narrow scope [20]
AGSA	2025	Multiple criteria	Numerical + Star diagram	Integrated scoring; Visual comparison	Recent development; Limited validation [20]

Complementary Assessment Approaches

Modern analytical laboratories often employ multiple green assessment tools to gain complementary insights into method environmental performance. The case study of sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME) method for antiviral compounds demonstrates how different metrics provide valuable perspectives:

• MoGAPI assessment scored the method at 60/100, highlighting strengths in green solvents and microextraction but noting concerns about waste generation and operator safety [20]
• AGREE evaluation yielded a score of 0.56, recognizing benefits of miniaturization and semiautomation while identifying issues with toxic solvents and low throughput [20]
• AGSA analysis provided a score of 58.33, emphasizing strengths in semi-miniaturization but noting limitations in manual handling and waste management [20]
• CaFRI assessment resulted in a score of 60, acknowledging low energy consumption but criticizing absence of renewable energy and CO₂ tracking [20]

This multi-tool approach reveals that while AGREE provides one of the most comprehensive assessments based on established GAC principles, it gains value when supplemented with tools that offer different perspectives, such as AGREEprep for detailed sample preparation analysis or CaFRI for climate impact focus [20].

Case Study: Experimental Application of AGREE

The application of AGREE assessment is demonstrated through a detailed case study of the Sugaring-Out-Induced Homogeneous Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (SULLME) method for determining antiviral compounds [20]. This microextraction technique represents an approach to sample preparation that aims to reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance.

Experimental Protocol:

• Sample Preparation: A 1 mL sample volume is processed using sugaring-out agents to induce phase separation
• Extraction Technique: Homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction achieves pre-concentration with minimal solvent consumption (<10 mL total)
• Instrumental Analysis: Separation and detection using chromatographic techniques with appropriate detection systems
• Specific Conditions: The method operates at room temperature, utilizes semi-automated equipment, and processes approximately two samples per hour
• Reagent Profile: Employs a combination of biobased reagents alongside moderately toxic and flammable solvents
• Waste Management: Generates more than 10 mL of waste per sample without specific treatment procedures

This method was systematically evaluated using AGREE and other complementary metrics to provide a comprehensive sustainability profile, highlighting both environmental advantages and areas for improvement [20].

AGREE Assessment Results and Interpretation

The AGREE evaluation of the SULLME method yielded a final score of 0.56 on the 0-1 scale, indicating moderate environmental performance with significant opportunities for improvement [20]. The assessment provided detailed insights across the 12 GAC principles:

Table 2: Detailed AGREE Assessment of SULLME Method

GAC Principle	Performance Assessment	Score Contribution
Directness	Minimal sample treatment required	Moderate positive
Sample Size	Small volume (1 mL)	Strong positive
In-line Measurement	Limited portability	Moderate negative
Integration	Semi-automated process	Moderate positive
Reagent Reduction	<10 mL solvent consumption	Strong positive
Energy Consumption	Moderate energy use	Neutral
Renewable Resources	Partial use of biobased reagents	Moderate positive
Multi-analyte Capacity	Targeted analysis	Limited positive
Reagent Safety	Toxic and flammable solvents	Significant negative
Waste Generation	>10 mL waste without treatment	Strong negative
Operator Safety	Moderate risk concerns	Moderate negative
Derivatization	No derivatization required	Strong positive

The AGREE pictogram visually represented this performance through varying color intensities in its 12 segments, immediately highlighting strengths in sample size, reagent reduction, and derivatization avoidance, while clearly identifying weaknesses in waste management and reagent safety [20].

Comparative Performance Analysis

When compared with other green assessment tools applied to the same SULLME method, AGREE provided consistent but uniquely nuanced insights:

• AGREE vs. MoGAPI: Both identified similar strengths (miniaturization, solvent reduction) and weaknesses (waste generation, reagent toxicity), but AGREE provided a more nuanced quantitative score (0.56) compared to MoGAPI's more categorical assessment [20]
• AGREE vs. AGSA: The tools showed general agreement, though AGSA placed greater emphasis on operational factors like manual handling and process integration [20]
• AGREE vs. CaFRI: While AGREE focused on comprehensive principle adherence, CaFRI provided specialized insight into climate-specific impacts like carbon footprint and renewable energy use [20]

This comparative analysis demonstrates that AGREE serves as an excellent primary assessment tool due to its comprehensive principle coverage, while supplementary tools can provide valuable specialized perspectives on specific environmental aspects.

Implementation Guide: Software and Practical Application

AGREE Software Toolkit

The AGREE metric is implemented through dedicated, open-source software available for download at: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [9]. This software provides a user-friendly interface that guides analysts through the complete assessment process.

Software Requirements and Installation:

• Platform Compatibility: Windows, macOS, and Linux environments
• Dependencies: Standard runtime libraries with no specialized requirements
• Installation Process: Straightforward download and setup with comprehensive documentation
• User Interface: Intuitive input forms for data entry across the 12 GAC principles
• Output Options: High-quality pictogram export in multiple formats for publications and presentations

The software interface is structured to systematically guide users through data input for each of the 12 principles, with tooltips and examples to ensure consistent interpretation of requirements. The automated scoring algorithm eliminates calculation errors and ensures standardized application across different methods and users [9].

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Development

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function in Analytical Methods	Green Alternatives	Environmental Considerations
Biobased Solvents	Extraction and separation media	Ethyl lactate, Cyrene, 2-MeTHF	Renewable feedstocks; Biodegradability [20]
Ionic Liquids	Selective extraction media	Bio-derived ionic liquids	Reduced volatility; Tunable properties
Supercritical Fluids	Chromatographic mobile phases	CO₂ under pressure	Non-flammable; Recyclable [20]
Solid-Phase Materials	Sample preparation sorbents	Biopolymer-based sorbents	Reduced solvent consumption; Reusability
Derivatization Agents	Analyte functionalization	Water-compatible reagents	Reduced toxicity; Simplified procedures
Waste Treatment Additives	Post-analysis processing	Biodegradation enhancers	Environmental impact mitigation [20]

Best Practices for Effective AGREE Implementation

To maximize the effectiveness and reliability of AGREE assessments, analysts should adhere to several key practices:

• Comprehensive Data Collection: Gather complete information on all method parameters before assessment, including safety data sheets for all reagents, detailed equipment specifications, and accurate measurements of consumption and waste
• Consistent Scoring Application: Maintain consistent interpretation of scoring criteria across multiple assessments through standardized documentation and team calibration exercises
• Comparative Analysis Framework: Apply AGREE to multiple methodological approaches to enable comparative environmental decision-making rather than absolute assessments
• Iterative Method Optimization: Use AGREE iteratively during method development to identify environmental bottlenecks and guide improvement strategies
• Complementary Tool Integration: Supplement AGREE with specialized tools like AGREEprep for sample preparation focus or CaFRI for climate impact when comprehensive environmental profiling is required [20]
• Transparent Reporting: Include full AGREE assessment details in methodological publications to enable reproducibility and scientific discourse

These practices ensure that AGREE implementation moves beyond simple compliance checking to become an integral part of sustainable method development and optimization, ultimately advancing the principles of green analytical chemistry in practical laboratory settings.

The AGREE metric represents a significant advancement in the environmental assessment of analytical methods, providing a comprehensive, principle-based framework that balances scientific rigor with practical usability. Through its 12-segment pictogram and numerical scoring system, it effectively communicates complex environmental performance data in an accessible format, enabling analysts to quickly identify strengths and weaknesses across the complete methodological spectrum [9] [20].

The case study of the SULLME method demonstrates AGREE's practical utility in providing actionable insights for method optimization, highlighting how the tool can guide researchers toward more sustainable analytical practices. While AGREE shows particular strengths in comprehensive principle coverage and user-friendly software implementation, its effectiveness is enhanced when used as part of a complementary toolset that includes specialized metrics like AGREEprep for sample preparation focus and CaFRI for climate impact assessment [20].

As green analytical chemistry continues to evolve, the AGREE metric establishes itself as an essential component of the analytical chemist's toolkit, supporting the transition toward more environmentally responsible laboratory practices. Its open-source availability and active development community suggest continued refinement and adaptation to emerging sustainability challenges in analytical science [9].

Selecting an analytical method requires balancing multiple, often competing, performance and practical characteristics. Weighting strategies provide a structured framework to customize the importance of these criteria, enabling scientists to make objective, reproducible, and application-specific decisions. Within the context of comparative greenness assessment using the AGREE metric, effective weighting is crucial for balancing environmental impact with the analytical performance (red criteria) and practical/economic aspects (blue criteria) defined by the White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept [14] [2].

This guide compares different weighting frameworks and provides methodologies for their implementation in analytical method selection and assessment.

Foundations of Weighted Scoring Models

A weighted scoring model is a quantitative prioritization framework that evaluates options against a set of predefined criteria, each assigned a weight reflecting its relative importance [22] [23]. This transforms subjective decision-making into a transparent, data-driven process.

• Core Components: The model consists of evaluation criteria, assigned weights, and a scoring system. Common criteria in analytical chemistry include performance characteristics (e.g., accuracy, precision, detection limit), practical factors (e.g., cost, speed, ease of use), and greenness parameters [14] [23].
• Calculation Method: The overall score for each method is calculated as the sum of its scores multiplied by the corresponding weights [22]. For a method scored across n criteria, the total score = Σ (Scorei × Weighti). This calculation results in a single, comparable metric for each option.

Weighting Strategy Applications and Comparison

Different scientific and regulatory contexts call for tailored weighting approaches. The table below summarizes the focus and key features of several established frameworks.

Table 1: Comparison of Weighting Frameworks in Analytical Science

Framework Name	Primary Application Focus	Key Weighting Criteria	Visual Output
Weighted Scoring Model [22] [23]	General project & feature prioritization	Customizable (e.g., customer value, strategic alignment, effort)	Prioritized list or scorecard
AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) [10]	Environmental impact of analytical methods	12 principles of GAC (user-defined weights)	Clock-like pictogram with overall score
RAPI (Red Analytical Performance Index) [14]	Analytical performance and validation parameters	10 core performance criteria (e.g., repeatability, accuracy, sensitivity)	Star-like pictogram with color intensity
BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index) [14]	Practicality and economic factors	10 practicality criteria (e.g., cost, time, operational simplicity)	Star-like pictogram with color intensity
Analytical Target Profile (ATP) [24]	Regulatory method development in pharmaceuticals	Performance characteristics linked to Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)	Text-based profile with acceptance criteria

Weighting in Greenness Assessment: The AGREE Metric

The AGREE metric assesses the greenness of analytical methods against the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [10]. Its weighting strategy is highly flexible.

• Implementation: Users can assign a weight from 0 to 1 to each of the 12 principles, signifying its relative importance for a specific assessment [10]. A wider segment in the output pictogram indicates a higher assigned weight.
• Significance: This allows a laboratory to prioritize principles most relevant to its context. For example, a lab handling expensive reagents might give higher weight to "Minimal Sample Size," while a high-throughput lab might prioritize "Throughput and Number of Analyses Per Time."

The workflow below illustrates the weighting and assessment process.

Integrating Performance and Practicality: RAPI and BAGI

The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) model advocates for a balanced assessment using three primary colors [14]:

• Red represents analytical performance (addressed by RAPI).
• Blue represents practicality and economics (addressed by BAGI).
• Green represents environmental impact (addressed by AGREE and other green metrics).

RAPI and BAGI use automated scoring systems to evaluate methods against 10 criteria each, generating a visual star-like pictogram [14]. The color intensity of each segment reflects performance, providing an immediate visual comparison.

Experimental Protocols for Method Comparison

To generate reliable data for weighted scoring, robust experimental protocols are essential.

Protocol for Analytical Method Comparison

This protocol is adapted from established method validation guidelines [25].

• Purpose: To estimate the systematic error (inaccuracy) and compare the analytical performance of a test method against a reference or comparative method.
• Experimental Design:
  • Sample Selection: A minimum of 40 different patient specimens should be tested. Specimens must be carefully selected to cover the entire working range of the method and should represent the expected sample matrix and interferences [25].
  • Analysis: Analyze each specimen by both the test and comparative methods. Ideally, analyses should be performed in duplicate over a minimum of 5 different days to account for daily performance variations [25].
  • Specimen Stability: Specimens should be analyzed within two hours of each other by both methods to prevent degradation from affecting results [25].
• Data Analysis:
  • Graphical Inspection: Create a difference plot (test result - comparative result vs. comparative result) or a comparison plot (test result vs. comparative result) to visually identify trends and outliers [25].
  • Statistical Calculations: For data covering a wide analytical range, use linear regression analysis to calculate the slope, y-intercept, and standard deviation about the regression line (Sy/x). The systematic error at a critical decision concentration (Xc) is calculated as: SE = (a + bXc) - Xc [25].

Protocol for Greenness Assessment with AGREE

• Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate and compare the environmental impact of analytical methods.
• Experimental/Methodological Data Collection:
  • Gather all relevant data for the analytical procedure, including: type and amount of reagents, energy consumption, waste produced, number of procedural steps, and whether the analysis is direct, on-line, at-line, or off-line [10].
  • Input this data into the open-source AGREE software, available at https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [10].
• Weighting and Calculation:
  • Assign a weight from 0 to 1 to each of the 12 GAC principles based on the specific application needs and priorities.
  • The software automatically transforms the input data into a score between 0 and 1 for each principle, calculates the overall score, and generates the characteristic clock-shaped pictogram [10].

The Scientist's Toolkit

The table below lists key resources and software tools essential for implementing the weighting strategies discussed.

Table 2: Essential Tools for Assessment and Weighting

Tool/Resource Name	Function/Brief Explanation	Access Information
AGREE Calculator	Open-source software for calculating the Analytical GREEnness metric score and generating a pictogram.	https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [10]
RAPI Software	Open-source tool for assessing the "red" analytical performance of a method against 10 validation criteria.	https://mostwiedzy.pl/rapi [14]
BAGI Software	Open-source tool for assessing the "blue" practicality and economic aspects of an analytical method.	https://mostwiedzy.pl/bagi [14]
ICH Q2(R2) Guideline	The definitive international regulatory guideline defining validation parameters for analytical procedures.	Foundation for setting performance criteria in ATP and RAPI [24].
Analytical Target Profile (ATP)	A regulatory tool that prospectively defines the requirements an analytical procedure must meet.	Serves as a foundation for defining criteria and weights in pharmaceutical development [24].

Strategic Implementation of Weighting

Successfully applying weighting strategies requires more than just calculation; it demands strategic planning and teamwork.

• Define Clear, Collaborative Criteria: The first step is identifying what truly drives value for a specific application. This requires collaboration between product managers, stakeholders, and cross-functional teams to ensure alignment [22]. Criteria should be specific, measurable, and aligned with strategic goals, avoiding vague or subjective terms [23].
• Calibrate Scoring and Review Regularly: Before scoring, teams should calibrate their understanding of the criteria and scoring scales to ensure consistency [23]. Furthermore, the weighting model is not static. Priorities shift with changing strategy, market conditions, or resources. The model, including criteria and weights, should be reviewed and updated regularly to maintain its relevance [22] [23].

The logical relationship between different assessment tools and the final selection decision is summarized below.

In the pharmaceutical industry, the environmental impact of analytical methods, particularly chromatography, is increasingly scrutinized. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) aims to minimize this impact by reducing hazardous substance use, energy consumption, and waste generation [20]. Among the tools developed to quantify the environmental footprint of analytical procedures, the Analytical Greenness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive and user-friendly assessment tool [26]. AGREE evaluates analytical methods against the 12 core principles of GAC, providing both a numerical score (from 0 to 1) and an intuitive, clock-like pictogram that offers an at-a-glance sustainability profile [27] [20]. This case study objectively compares the application of the AGREE metric to various chromatographic methods used in contemporary drug analysis, providing researchers with a structured comparison of their environmental performance.

AGREE in Practice: Comparative Analysis of Chromatographic Methods

The following analysis synthesizes AGREE assessment data from recent pharmaceutical analysis literature, focusing on reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) methods developed for different drug classes.

Table 1: AGREE Greenness Comparison of Recent Chromatographic Methods for Drug Analysis

Drug Category Analyzed	Specific Analytes	AGREE Score	Key Green Method Attributes	Cited Reference
COVID-19 Antivirals	Favipiravir, Molnupiravir, Nirmatrelvir, Remdesivir, Ritonavir	0.70	Isocratic elution with methanol/water mobile phase; minimal sample preparation; 1 mL/min flow rate.	[28]
Calcium Channel Blockers	Amlodipine, Nifedipine, Lercanidipine, Nimodipine, Nitrendipine	Reported (Value not specified in extracts)	Employed Quality by Design (QbD) for optimization; used acetonitrile-methanol-TEA mobile phase.	[29]
Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs)	8 AEDs + 2 metabolites (e.g., Lamotrigine, Carbamazepine)	Reported (Value not specified in extracts)	Used ethanol and 15 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate as a green mobile phase; ethanol-based protein precipitation.	[30]

The data in Table 1 demonstrates a trend towards developing chromatographic methods with explicit consideration of their environmental impact. The COVID-19 antiviral method achieved a notably high AGREE score of 0.70, which can be attributed to its strategic design choices that align with GAC principles [28]. The method's use of a simpler isocratic elution system, as opposed to a more solvent-intensive gradient elution, reduces solvent consumption. Furthermore, its reliance on methanol, which has a better environmental, health, and safety (EHS) profile than solvents like acetonitrile, significantly contributes to its greenness [26].

Detailed Experimental Protocols and Workflows

To illustrate how these greenness assessments are conducted and what a high-scoring method entails, this section details the protocols for two key cases.

Protocol 1: Simultaneous Analysis of Five COVID-19 Antiviral Drugs

This RP-HPLC method exemplifies a green and practical approach for quality control [28].

• Instrumentation: An Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump, autosampler, thermostatted column compartment, and diode array detector (DAD) was used. Data processing was performed with Agilent ChemStation software.
• Chromatographic Conditions:
  • Column: Hypersil BDS C18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm; 5 μm particle size).
  • Mobile Phase: Isocratic elution with a mixture of water and methanol (30:70, v/v), with pH adjusted to 3.0 using 0.1% ortho-phosphoric acid.
  • Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min.
  • Detection: UV at 230 nm.
  • Injection Volume: 20 μL.
  • Column Temperature: 25 ± 0.5 °C.
  • Run Time: 6 minutes.
• Sample Preparation:
  • Stock solutions (1000 μg/mL) of each drug were prepared in methanol.
  • Working standard solutions were obtained by diluting the stock solutions with methanol.
  • For pharmaceutical formulations, the content of capsules or powdered tablets was extracted with methanol via sonication, followed by filtration.
• Validation: The method was validated per ICH guidelines, demonstrating linearity (10–50 μg/mL), precision (RSD < 1.1%), and high trueness (99.59–100.08%).

Protocol 2: Analysis of Anti-Epileptic Drugs in Human Serum

This method highlights greenness in a complex bioanalytical context, requiring serum sample preparation [30].

• Instrumentation: A standard High-Performance Liquid Chromatography system was used.
• Chromatographic Conditions:
  • Column: ZORBAX Eclipse Plus-C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 μm).
  • Mobile Phase: Gradient elution with ethanol and a 15 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate water solution.
  • Internal Standard: Chlorzoxazone.
• Sample Preparation:
  • Protein Precipitation: Ethanol was used as an eco-friendly protein precipitant for human serum samples.
  • The supernatant was injected into the HPLC system after precipitation and separation.
• Greenness Assessment: The method's greenness was evaluated using AGREE, AGREEprep, GAPI, and BAGI tools, confirming its status as an eco-friendly procedure.

The workflow for developing and greenness-profiling an analytical method involves several key stages, from design to multi-faceted evaluation, as shown in the diagram below.

Analytical Method Development and Greenness Assessment Workflow. The process begins with method design, proceeds through critical experimental stages (yellow), is validated for performance (green), and is formally assessed for environmental impact (blue) to produce a final greenness profile.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

The greenness of a chromatographic method is heavily influenced by the choice of reagents and materials. The following table lists key items used in the cited studies and explains their role in promoting sustainability.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Chromatography

Reagent/Material	Function in Analytical Method	Greenness Consideration
Methanol	Mobile phase component; solvent for standards and samples.	Preferable to acetonitrile due to its better environmental, health, and safety (EHS) profile and lower energy of production [28] [26].
Ethanol	Mobile phase component; protein precipitant.	A renewable, biodegradable, and less toxic solvent, making it an excellent green alternative [30].
Water	Mobile phase component; dilution solvent.	Non-toxic, safe, and the most environmentally benign solvent available.
Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate	Buffer component in mobile phase to control pH.	Aqueous buffers are generally preferred over organic modifiers for environmental and safety reasons [30].
Hypersil BDS C18 / ZORBAX Eclipse Plus-C18	Stationary phase for chromatographic separation.	Selecting columns that enable fast separations reduces overall runtime, solvent consumption, and energy use [28] [29].

Beyond AGREE: The Multi-Tool Assessment Strategy

A comprehensive understanding of a method's sustainability requires looking beyond a single metric. The concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) has been introduced to balance environmental sustainability (Green) with analytical functionality (Red) and practical/economic feasibility (Blue) [20]. Consequently, the current best practice is to use a suite of complementary assessment tools.

• AGREEprep: A dedicated metric for evaluating the sample preparation stage, which is often the most resource-intensive part of an analytical workflow [27] [20].
• Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI): Assesses the practical side of the method, including cost, time, and ease of implementation, ensuring that green methods are also viable for routine use [7] [28].
• Analytical Eco-Scale & GAPI: Other well-established greenness assessment tools that provide a semi-quantitative score (Eco-Scale) or a detailed pictogram (GAPI) of the entire analytical process [31] [20].

The relationship between these different assessment perspectives is visualized in the following diagram.

The Triadic WAC Model for Method Assessment. A comprehensive evaluation balances environmental impact (Green) with practical feasibility (Blue) and analytical performance (Red). AGREE is a core component of the green assessment. CACI = Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry Index.

This case study demonstrates that the AGREE metric is a pivotal tool for driving sustainability in pharmaceutical analysis. The comparative data shows that strategic choices, such as selecting greener solvents like methanol or ethanol, simplifying sample preparation, and optimizing chromatographic conditions for speed and efficiency, directly translate to improved AGREE scores and a reduced environmental footprint. The recent methods analyzed herein provide a roadmap for developing environmentally responsible chromatographic procedures without compromising analytical performance. For researchers, adopting a multi-tool assessment strategy that includes AGREE, AGREEprep, and BAGI is crucial for developing methods that are not only green but also robust, practical, and well-suited for the demanding environment of drug development and quality control.

The growing emphasis on environmental sustainability has made Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) an essential discipline for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals. GAC principles aim to minimize the environmental impact of analytical procedures by reducing hazardous solvent consumption, energy requirements, and waste generation while maintaining analytical performance. Within this framework, sample preparation has been identified as a critical step that often contributes significantly to a method's environmental footprint due to its frequent reliance on large solvent volumes, hazardous reagents, and energy-intensive processes. The need to quantitatively evaluate and improve this specific analytical stage led to the development of specialized metric tools, including the Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep) [8].

AGREEprep represents a significant advancement in the metric tool landscape as the first dedicated tool for evaluating the environmental impact of sample preparation methods. It provides researchers with a standardized approach to assess this crucial step against ten core principles of green sample preparation, offering both visual and quantitative outputs to facilitate method comparison and optimization [8]. This guide provides a comprehensive comparison of AGREEprep against other greenness assessment metrics, evaluates its application across various sample preparation techniques, and demonstrates its integration within the broader context of holistic method assessment in pharmaceutical research and drug development.

The Evolution of Green Metric Tools

The development of greenness assessment tools has progressed from basic evaluations to sophisticated, multi-criteria metrics that provide comprehensive environmental profiling of analytical methods. The timeline began with early tools like the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), which used a simple pictogram with binary (yes/no) assessment across four criteria [20]. Subsequent metrics introduced more nuanced scoring systems, including the Analytical Eco-Scale which assigns penalty points to non-green aspects [10], and the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) with its five-part color-coded pictogram covering the entire analytical process [20].

A significant advancement came with the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric, which implemented the 12 principles of GAC into a unified scoring system visualized through a circular pictogram [10]. The subsequent introduction of AGREEprep specifically addressed sample preparation—often the least green analytical step—through ten assessment criteria aligned with green sample preparation principles [8]. Most recently, the field has expanded to include multi-dimensional assessment frameworks such as White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which integrates environmental (green), practical (blue), and performance (red) criteria to provide a balanced evaluation of analytical methods [14].

Comparison of Major Green Assessment Metrics

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics

Metric Tool	Number of Criteria	Assessment Scope	Scoring System	Key Advantages	Primary Limitations
NEMI	4	Entire method	Binary (green/white)	Simple, user-friendly	Limited discrimination; no quantitative output [20]
Analytical Eco-Scale	Multiple	Entire method	Penalty points (0-100)	Quantitative result; facilitates comparison	Subjective penalty assignment [10]
GAPI	Multiple	Entire method	3-level color scale	Visualizes impact across analytical stages	No overall score; some subjectivity [20]
AGREE	12	Entire method	0-1 scale with weighting	Comprehensive; combines pictogram and score	Subjective weighting possible [10]
AGREEprep	10	Sample preparation only	0-1 scale with weighting	Specific focus on critical sample preparation stage	Must be combined with other tools for full method assessment [8]
GEMAM	22 (12 GAC + 10 GSP)	Entire method	0-10 scale	Combines GAC and sample preparation principles	Relatively new; less validation [32]

AGREEprep: Deep Dive into the Specialist Tool

Core Architecture and Calculation Methodology

AGREEprep employs a sophisticated yet user-friendly architecture based on ten fundamental principles of green sample preparation. Each criterion is evaluated and transformed into a score on a unified 0-1 scale, with the final composite score calculated through a weighted aggregation of these individual scores [8]. The tool allows users to adjust weighting factors for each criterion based on their specific analytical requirements and environmental priorities, enhancing its flexibility and applicability across diverse methodological contexts [27].

The software generates an easily interpretable circular pictogram divided into ten sections, each corresponding to one assessment principle. The color of each segment ranges from red (poor performance) through yellow to green (excellent performance), while the final composite score (0-1) appears prominently in the center. This visualization enables immediate identification of both environmental strengths and weaknesses within the sample preparation procedure [8].

Assessment Criteria and Workflow

The ten principles assessed by AGREEprep encompass the comprehensive environmental profile of sample preparation methods. While the complete details of all criteria are available in the primary literature [8], they fundamentally address:

• Waste generation and management strategies
• Energy requirements and operational efficiency
• Health and safety hazards for analysts
• Scale of operation and miniaturization potential
• Operator convenience and automation level
• Integration potential with subsequent analytical stages
• Throughput and analysis time
• Chemicals consumption and solvent greenness
• Reusability of materials and devices
• Source of chemicals and renewable sourcing

The assessment workflow begins with collecting all relevant methodological data, followed by entering these parameters into the open-access AGREEprep software. The researcher then adjusts weighting factors if necessary, runs the calculation, and interprets the resulting pictogram and numerical score to identify opportunities for greenness improvement [8].

Comparative Performance Analysis

Case Study: Evaluation of Sample Preparation Methods for UV Filter Analysis

A recent comprehensive study compared the greenness profiles of ten different chromatographic methods for determining UV filters in cosmetic samples using both AGREE and AGREEprep metrics [27]. This analysis provides valuable experimental data for understanding how AGREEprep performs in practical applications compared to broader assessment tools.

The evaluated methods represented diverse sample preparation approaches, including conventional techniques like solvent extraction and solid-phase extraction (SPE), alongside modern microextraction methods such as microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS), μ-microsolid phase extraction (μ-MSPD), and dispersive solid-phase microextraction (DSPME). Each method was systematically assessed using both metrics, with detailed experimental parameters including solvent volumes, energy consumption, waste generation, and operational complexity [27].

Table 2: Greenness Scores of Sample Preparation Methods for UV Filter Analysis [27]

Sample Preparation Method	Analytical Technique	AGREE Score (0-1)	AGREEprep Score (0-1)	Key Greenness Strengths	Key Greenness Limitations
Solvent Extraction (European Standard)	LC-UV	0.41	0.32	Standardized protocol	High solvent consumption, waste generation
Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE)	GC-MS	0.38	0.29	Efficient extraction	High energy requirements
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE)	LC-MS/MS	0.44	0.36	Good selectivity	Solvent-intensive, medium waste
Microextraction by Packed Sorbent (MEPS)	LC-MS/MS	0.62	0.58	Minimal solvent, reusable device	Moderate throughput
μ-Microsolid Phase Extraction (μ-MSPD)	LC-DAD	0.65	0.61	Small sample size, minimal reagents	Limited application scope
Dispersive Solid-Phase Microextraction (DSPME)	LC-DAD	0.67	0.63	Solvent-free, rapid	Manual operation
Ultrasound-Assisted DLLME	GC-MS	0.59	0.55	Minimal solvents, fast	Specialized equipment needed
Dynamic HF-LPME	LC-UV	0.71	0.68	Very low solvent consumption, high enrichment	Technically challenging, low throughput

Interpretation of Comparative Results

The case study data reveals several important patterns regarding AGREEprep's performance as a specialized assessment tool. First, microextraction techniques consistently outperformed conventional methods across both metrics, with dynamic hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) achieving the highest scores (AGREE: 0.71; AGREEprep: 0.68) [27]. This alignment between the general AGREE metric and specialized AGREEprep assessment validates the tool's accuracy in identifying environmentally superior sample preparation approaches.

Second, the AGREEprep scores were generally lower than AGREE scores for corresponding methods, reflecting its specialized focus on sample preparation—typically the least green analytical phase. This scoring difference was particularly pronounced for methods that employed greener detection techniques but less sustainable sample preparation, demonstrating AGREEprep's ability to highlight environmental shortcomings that might be masked in broader assessments [27].

The research confirmed that methods incorporating miniaturization, solvent reduction, and integration principles achieved substantially higher AGREEprep scores. The top-performing techniques shared common green attributes including total solvent volumes below 10 mL, minimal waste generation, moderate to high throughput, and avoidance of hazardous reagents [27].

AGREEprep within the Broader Assessment Framework

Integration with Complementary Metric Tools

While AGREEprep provides specialized assessment of sample preparation greenness, comprehensive method evaluation requires integration with complementary metrics that address other critical dimensions of analytical procedures. The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) framework has emerged as a holistic approach that balances environmental, practical, and performance criteria [14].

Within this framework, AGREEprep optimally pairs with tools such as the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI), which evaluates ten analytical performance parameters including precision, sensitivity, and accuracy, and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI), which assesses practical aspects such as cost, time, and operational complexity [14]. This integrated approach enables researchers to balance environmental sustainability with the methodological rigor and practical feasibility required for drug development applications.

Application in Drug Development Context

The pharmaceutical industry presents particular challenges for green sample preparation, including complex biological matrices, stringent regulatory requirements, and the need for high sensitivity and reproducibility. Within this context, AGREEprep serves as a valuable tool for rational method selection and optimization during analytical development for drug substances, drug products, and bioanalysis [33].

Recent trends in drug development testing services emphasize miniaturization, automation, and green chemistry principles, aligning directly with AGREEprep's assessment criteria [33]. The growing adoption of microextraction techniques, solvent-less extraction methods, and automated sample preparation platforms in pharmaceutical analysis reflects the industry's response to the environmental priorities quantified by tools like AGREEprep.

For drug development professionals, AGREEprep provides a standardized framework to justify method selection to regulatory agencies and internal stakeholders based on quantitative environmental metrics, while the complementary use of performance and practicality tools ensures maintained compliance with analytical method validation requirements [33] [34].

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for Sustainable Sample Preparation Methods

Reagent/Material	Function in Sample Preparation	Green Attributes	Application Examples
Biobased Solvents (e.g., ethanol, ethyl lactate)	Extraction and dissolution medium	Renewable sourcing, reduced toxicity, biodegradable	Replacement for acetonitrile in HPLC methods [20]
Ionic Liquids	Extraction solvents, modifiers	Minimal volatility, reusable, tunable properties	DLLME for preconcentration of analytes [27]
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers	Selective sorbents for extraction	High specificity, reusability, reduced solvent needs	SPE for selective isolation of target compounds [5]
Carbon Nanomaterials	Sorbents for microextraction	High capacity, reusable, minimal requirements	DSPME for contaminant monitoring [27]
Supramolecular Solvents	Extraction media	Self-assembled, low toxicity, versatile	SUPRAS for organic compound extraction [20]
Switchable Solvents	Extraction and phase separation	Tunable properties, recyclable	Fatty acid extraction, partitioning systems [8]

AGREEprep represents a specialized, fit-for-purpose metric that addresses the critical need for standardized environmental assessment of sample preparation methods. When integrated within a comprehensive evaluation framework that includes performance and practicality metrics, it provides researchers and drug development professionals with a powerful decision-support tool for selecting and optimizing sustainable analytical methods. The continued adoption and development of such metric tools will play a crucial role in advancing green chemistry principles throughout the pharmaceutical and analytical sciences, contributing to more environmentally responsible drug development processes without compromising analytical quality or regulatory compliance.

Interpreting the results from greenness assessment metrics and translating them into concrete improvement actions is a critical skill for modern researchers. This guide provides a structured approach to using the AGREE metric (Analytical GREEnness) score to enhance your analytical methods' environmental footprint.

Decoding the AGREE Score: From Pictogram to Action Plan

The AGREE metric provides a comprehensive greenness profile of an analytical method. The output is a circular pictogram with 12 segments, each corresponding to one of the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), with a central score on a 0-10 scale. The color intensity of each segment and the final score are your primary levers for interpretation and improvement [32].

The table below outlines a general framework for interpreting the overall AGREE score and planning subsequent actions.

Table 1: AGREE Score Interpretation and Improvement Strategy

AGREE Score Range	Interpretation of Greenness	Recommended Improvement Focus
0.0 - 3.0	Inadequate	Fundamental re-engineering required. Address high-impact criteria like waste amount, reagent toxicity, and energy consumption first [5].
3.1 - 6.0	Moderate	Targeted optimization. Focus on segments with the lowest individual scores (lightest colors), such as improving derivatization or streamlining sample preparation [32].
6.1 - 8.0	Good	Fine-tuning and innovation. Explore alternative, greener solvents or invest in automation and direct analysis techniques to replace intensive sample preparation [5].
8.1 - 10.0	Excellent	Benchmarking and maintenance. The method is a benchmark for greenness; focus on maintaining performance and validating any future changes [32].

A Comparative View of Greenness and Performance Metrics

AGREE is one of many tools available. A holistic method evaluation considers not only greenness but also practical and performance criteria, as conceptualized by the White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) model. The table below compares AGREE with other relevant metrics to guide their complementary use [14].

Table 2: Comparison of Analytical Method Assessment Metrics

Metric Name	Primary Focus	Key Criteria	Output Format	Best Used For
AGREE	Greenness	12 principles of GAC [32]	Pictogram (0-10 score) [32]	Comprehensive environmental and safety impact assessment.
NEMI	Greenness	4 criteria (PBT, corrosive, hazardous, waste >50g) [5]	Quadrant pictogram (binary: green/white) [5]	Quick, simplified initial screening of method greenness.
BAGI	Practicality & Economy	10 practical criteria (e.g., cost, time, operational simplicity) [14]	Star pictogram (score 25-100) [14]	Assessing the practicality, cost, and ease of implementation.
RAPI	Analytical Performance	10 validation parameters (e.g., precision, accuracy, LOD/LOQ) [14]	Star pictogram (score 0-100) [14]	Evaluating the method's robustness, reliability, and analytical figures of merit.

Experimental Protocol for a Comparative Greenness Assessment

The following workflow provides a standardized protocol for conducting a comparative greenness assessment, which is the foundation for identifying improvement actions.

The diagram illustrates the core workflow for a comparative assessment. The process begins with defining the analytical problem and selecting the methods to be evaluated. The critical experimental phase involves meticulous data collection on all method parameters, which feeds into the scoring via AGREE and other metrics, leading to comparison and, ultimately, actionable improvement plans [32] [14].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Method Development

Table 3: Key Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Chemistry

Item / Reagent	Function in Analytical Methods	Green Considerations & Alternatives
Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES)	Green solvent for extraction; can replace conventional organic solvents.	Biodegradability, low toxicity, preparation from natural sources [5].
Supercritical CO₂	Extraction fluid; replaces halogenated and hydrocarbon solvents.	Non-toxic, non-flammable, easily removed from the extract [5].
Ionic Liquids	Versatile solvents for various stages of analysis, including separation.	Tunable properties, low volatility reducing inhalation hazards [5].
Water (as a solvent)	Solvent for extraction or as a mobile phase in chromatography.	Non-toxic, non-flammable, cheap; however, energy for purification is a factor [5].
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fiber	Solvent-less sample preparation technique for extraction and concentration.	Eliminates need for large volumes of organic solvents [32].
Automated Sample Preparation Systems	Robotic systems for handling samples and reagents.	Improves precision, reduces human error, and minimizes reagent consumption [5].

Optimization Strategies: Overcoming Common AGREE Implementation Challenges

The imperative for sustainable laboratory practices has made the greenness assessment of analytical methods a fundamental aspect of modern analytical chemistry. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) aims to minimize the negative environmental impact of analytical procedures, focusing on reducing hazardous reagent use, energy consumption, and waste generation [32] [2]. Within this framework, the AGREE metric (Analytical Greenness Metric) has emerged as a comprehensive, user-friendly tool that quantitatively evaluates the environmental performance of analytical methods [27]. AGREE stands out from earlier assessment tools by incorporating all 12 principles of GAC into its evaluation system, providing a more holistic assessment than previous tools like NEMI or GAPI [5] [27].

The output of AGREE is an intuitive, clock-like pictogram where each of the 12 sections corresponds to one GAC principle, with a final composite score from 0-1 (with 1 representing ideal greenness) displayed at the center [27]. This visual representation immediately highlights which principles contribute negatively to the overall greenness score, directing researchers toward specific aspects requiring improvement. Unlike simple pass/fail systems, AGREE provides a nuanced evaluation that helps laboratories identify critical points for method optimization, supporting the continuous improvement philosophy central to green chemistry [5]. The tool is openly available as downloadable software, further enhancing its accessibility and adoption within the scientific community [27].

Methodology of AGREE Assessment

The Twelve Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

The AGREE metric evaluates analytical methods against the twelve foundational principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [27]. These principles encompass the entire analytical procedure, from sample preparation to final determination. The evaluation criteria include: (1) Direct analytical techniques that avoid sample treatment; (2) Minimized sample preparation; (3) Reduced sample volume; (4) Optimization of calibration; (5) Avoidance of derivatization; (6) Green derivatization alternatives if necessary; (7) Automation and miniaturization; (8) Reduced waste generation; (9) Minimized reagent consumption and multi-analyte determinations; (10) Use of safer reagents; (11) Worker safety considerations; and (12) Reduced energy consumption [27]. Each principle is scored individually, and the software allows for weighting adjustments based on the relative importance of each criterion for a specific application.

Experimental Protocol for Method Evaluation

Implementing the AGREE metric requires a systematic approach to data collection and input. The following protocol ensures consistent and reproducible greenness assessments:

• Method Deconstruction: Break down the analytical method into discrete steps, including sample collection, preservation, preparation, instrumentation, and data analysis [32].

• Data Quantification: For each step, collect quantitative data including: volumes of all solvents and reagents consumed, mass of samples and standards used, energy requirements for each instrument (including heating, cooling, and analysis time), and exact quantities of waste generated [5] [27].

• Hazard Assessment: Classify all chemicals according to their environmental, health, and safety hazards using standardized systems such as GHS (Globally Harmonized System) [27].

• AGREE Software Input: Enter the collected data into the AGREE software, ensuring all twelve principles are addressed with the most accurate available information.

• Weight Adjustment (Optional): Modify default weightings if certain principles are particularly critical for your specific application context, documenting justifications for any changes [5].

• Score Interpretation: Analyze the output pictogram, noting both the overall score and individual principle scores, with special attention to principles scoring below 0.5.

• Comparative Assessment: When comparing multiple methods, ensure consistent data collection and weighting approaches across all evaluations [27].

For methods where sample preparation is particularly impactful, the complementary AGREEprep metric should be employed, which focuses specifically on the 10 principles of green sample preparation [27]. This tool follows a similar protocol but provides more granular insight into the sample preparation stage, which often represents the most environmentally problematic phase of analysis [27].

The diagram below illustrates the structured workflow for conducting a comprehensive greenness assessment using both AGREE and AGREEprep metrics:

Critical Analysis of Low-Scoring Principles

Common Critical Points in Analytical Methods

Analysis of AGREE assessments across diverse analytical methodologies reveals consistent patterns of low-scoring principles that substantially impact overall greenness performance. The following table summarizes the most frequently identified critical points based on evaluation of chromatographic methods for UV filter analysis in cosmetics [27]:

Table 1: Common Low-Scoring Principles in AGREE Assessment

Principle	Typical Score Range	Frequency of Low Scores	Primary Contributing Factors
Waste Generation	0.2-0.4	High	Large solvent volumes in HPLC, extraction wastes, post-analysis disposal
Energy Consumption	0.3-0.5	High	Energy-intensive techniques (GC-MS, LC-MS), lengthy procedures, high temperature requirements
Hazardous Reagents	0.3-0.6	Moderate-High	Toxic solvents (acetonitrile, chloroform), strong acids/bases, derivatization agents
Derivatization	0.1-0.5	Method-Dependent	Use of hazardous derivatization agents, additional energy and waste generation
Sample Preparation	0.3-0.6	High	Multiple extraction steps, large solvent volumes, lengthy procedures

The waste generation principle consistently scores lowest across multiple method comparisons, particularly in conventional chromatographic techniques [27]. For instance, methods based on standard solvent extraction followed by liquid chromatography typically generate 10-50 mL of hazardous waste per sample, primarily from organic solvents like methanol and acetonitrile [27]. This principle is critically weighted in AGREE assessments due to the direct environmental impact of waste disposal [5].

Energy consumption represents another frequently low-scoring principle, especially for methods employing gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC-MS) or other energy-intensive detection systems [27]. The cumulative energy demand of maintaining high temperatures for extended periods, combined with the vacuum requirements of mass spectrometers, creates substantial environmental footprints that negatively impact AGREE scores. Methods requiring lengthy extraction procedures, such as pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) or solid-phase extraction (SPE), further exacerbate energy consumption issues [27].

Case Study: UV Filter Analysis in Cosmetics

A comparative study of ten chromatographic methods for analyzing UV filters in cosmetic products provides concrete evidence of these critical points [27]. The evaluation revealed that conventional methods based on solvent extraction followed by liquid or gas chromatography scored lowest in overall AGREE assessment (scores 0.30-0.45), while microextraction techniques demonstrated significantly improved greenness (scores 0.55-0.70) [27].

The standard European method (EN 17156:2018) for determining 22 UV filters, which employs conventional solvent dissolution and liquid chromatography, achieved an AGREE score of just 0.41, with particularly low scores for waste generation (0.25), energy consumption (0.35), and hazardous reagents (0.40) [27]. In contrast, microextraction methods such as micro-MSPD (μ-MSPD) and dynamic HF-LPME demonstrated 35-45% higher scores in these critical areas, primarily through reduced solvent consumption (60-90% reduction) and shorter analysis times [27].

Notably, methods requiring derivatization for gas chromatographic analysis scored lowest in the derivatization principle (0.10-0.25), highlighting the severe environmental penalty associated with this procedural step [27]. The study concluded that microextraction techniques generally outperformed conventional approaches across most critical principles, validating their status as greener alternatives [27].

Strategies for Addressing Low-Scoring Principles

Targeted Improvement Approaches

Addressing critical points identified through AGREE assessment requires method-specific optimization strategies. The following approaches have demonstrated effectiveness in improving scores for commonly problematic principles:

• Miniaturization and Microextraction: Implementing microextraction techniques such as MEPS (MicroExtraction in Packed Sorbent), DSPME (Disposable Solid-Phase Microextraction), or US-VA-DLLME (Ultrasound-Assisted Vortex-Assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction) can reduce solvent consumption by 50-95% compared to conventional extraction methods [27]. This directly improves scores for waste generation, reagent consumption, and hazardous reagent principles. For example, in UV filter analysis, microextraction methods increased AGREE scores by 0.25-0.35 compared to conventional extraction approaches [27].

• Solvent Substitution and Reagent Management: Replacing hazardous solvents with safer alternatives significantly improves scores for principles 10 (safer reagents) and 9 (reagent consumption). For instance, substituting acetonitrile with ethanol or methanol in liquid chromatography reduces toxicity penalties [27]. Additionally, implementing reagent recycling systems and optimizing reagent quantities to the minimum effective volumes further enhances greenness performance [5].

• Energy Optimization and Method Integration: Combining analytical steps, reducing analysis temperatures where possible, and implementing energy-efficient equipment address the energy consumption principle. For chromatographic methods, switching to ultra-high performance systems (UPLC/UHPLC) reduces analysis time and associated energy use by 60-80% while maintaining analytical performance [27]. Automated method development systems also optimize energy parameters while reducing manual intervention.

• Waste Minimization and Recycling: Implementing in-line waste recycling systems, especially for solvent-intensive techniques like HPLC, directly targets the waste generation principle. Solid-phase extraction with recyclable sorbents, closed-system extraction, and solvent recovery technologies can reduce waste volumes by 40-70% [27]. Proper waste segregation and treatment further mitigate environmental impacts.

• Derivatization Elimination or Optimization: When possible, selecting analytical techniques that eliminate derivatization requirements (such as LC-MS/MS instead of GC-MS for non-volatile compounds) provides the most significant improvement for this principle [27]. When derivatization is unavoidable, using greener reagents, minimizing quantities, and selecting catalysts that improve reaction efficiency can substantially reduce the environmental footprint.

The Researcher's Toolkit: Essential Solutions for Green Method Improvement

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Optimization

Solution Category	Specific Examples	Function	Target AGREE Principles
Green Solvents	Ethanol, water, ethyl acetate, propylene carbonate	Replace hazardous solvents in extraction and analysis	Principles 9-10 (Reagent consumption & safety)
Microextraction Equipment	MEPS devices, SPME fibers, HF-LPME apparatus	Enable minimal solvent consumption in sample preparation	Principles 2-3-8 (Sample prep, volume & waste)
Energy-Efficient Instruments	UHPLC systems, low-thermal-mass GC, modern detectors	Reduce energy consumption during analysis	Principle 12 (Energy consumption)
Automated Systems	Robotic sample preparation, automated method development	Reduce manual operations and optimize parameters	Principle 7 (Automation)
Alternative Sorbents	Biopolymer-based sorbents, molecularly imprinted polymers	Provide effective extraction with reduced environmental impact	Principles 9-10 (Reagent consumption & safety)

The AGREE metric provides an invaluable framework for systematically identifying and addressing critical points in analytical method greenness. Through comprehensive assessment against the 12 principles of GAC, laboratories can pinpoint specific areas requiring improvement, with waste generation, energy consumption, and hazardous reagents consistently emerging as the most problematic principles across diverse methodologies [27]. The case study of UV filter analysis demonstrates that strategic implementation of microextraction techniques, solvent substitution, and energy optimization can improve AGREE scores by 0.25-0.35, transitioning methods from "yellow" (questionable greenness) to "green" (acceptable greenness) categories [27].

Future directions in greenness assessment point toward more integrated approaches that balance environmental impact with analytical functionality, as embodied in the emerging concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) [2] [5]. This holistic perspective acknowledges that unconditional increases in greenness at the expense of analytical performance are unsustainable for practical applications [2]. The ongoing refinement of metric tools, including the incorporation of uncertainty estimates and objective weighting systems, will further enhance the reliability and comparability of greenness assessments [5]. For researchers and drug development professionals, embracing these assessment frameworks enables continuous improvement of analytical practices, supporting both environmental stewardship and scientific excellence.

In the comparative greenness assessment of analytical methods using the AGREE metric, the completeness and quality of methodological data are paramount. The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric is a comprehensive, user-friendly calculator that evaluates analytical procedures against the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC), providing a unified score on a 0-1 scale along with an intuitive clock-like pictogram [10]. However, the assessment's accuracy is heavily dependent on having complete data for all input parameters. A data gap in this context occurs when essential methodological information required for the AGREE calculation is missing, incomplete, or inaccessible [35]. Such gaps can manifest as missing energy consumption figures, unreported waste generation volumes, or unspecified reagent toxicity data [8]. These are not merely academic inconveniences; they can alter the trajectory of research and policy, leading to skewed results, policy blind spots, and barriers to the replication of scientific findings [35]. Effectively managing these gaps is, therefore, a critical competency for researchers and analysts committed to advancing Green Analytical Chemistry.

A Systematic Framework for Managing Data Gaps

Navigating incomplete information requires a structured approach. The following workflow outlines a procedure for identifying, assessing, and rectifying data gaps during a greenness assessment.

Step 1: Identification and Classification of Data Gaps

The first step is a thorough review of the analytical method description against the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of GAC, which form the input criteria for the AGREE metric [10]. Common gaps include:

• Energy Consumption Data: The total energy in kilowatt-hours (kWh) required for the entire analytical procedure is often unreported [8].
• Waste Quantification: The total volume of waste generated, categorized by chemical composition, is frequently omitted [8] [10].
• Reagent Hazard Profiles: Detailed hazard classifications (e.g., GHS codes) for all reagents used may be missing.
• Sample Preparation Details: The number of procedural steps or the specific techniques used for sample treatment might be inadequately described, affecting the score for GAC Principle 1 [10].

Step 2: Selection and Application of Management Strategies

Once a gap is identified, the appropriate strategy from the table below must be selected and executed.

Table 1: Strategies for Managing Common Data Gaps in AGREE Assessments

Data Gap Type	Recommended Strategy	Specific Protocol / Action	Impact on AGREE Score
Energy Consumption	Estimation	Calculate: (Instrument Power in kW × Runtime in h) + (Ancillary Equipment Power × Runtime) [8]. Use manufacturer specifications for instrument power ratings.	Directly affects GAC Principle 3. An overestimation leads to a conservative (lower) greenness score.
Generated Waste	Estimation	Calculate total waste volume: Sum of all solvent/reagent volumes used in the procedure [8]. This includes mobile phases, extraction solvents, and cleaning solutions.	Directly affects GAC Principle 4. Accurate quantification is critical for a valid score.
Reagent Toxicity	Secondary Data Sourcing	Consult official, curated databases such as the EPA's Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) list or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) database to assign correct hazard classifications.	Affects multiple principles, including reagent-related hazards. Using standardized data improves consistency.
Method Details	Correspondence	Directly contact the corresponding author of the original method publication to request clarification on missing experimental details [35].	Can affect several principles. If unresolved, the assessor must make a conservative assumption.

Step 3: Documentation and Transparency

This is a critical, non-negotiable step. All assumptions, estimation protocols, and data sources used to fill gaps must be explicitly documented in the assessment report [36]. This transparency ensures the assessment is reproducible—allowing others to compute the same result—and clarifies the underlying uncertainties, which is essential for the replicability of the research by independent studies [36].

Experimental Protocols for Quantitative Data Estimation

Protocol 1: Estimation of Energy Consumption

Objective: To calculate the total energy demand (in kWh) of an analytical method when direct measurement is not available.

• Identify Energy-Consuming Equipment: List all instruments (e.g., HPLC system, centrifuge, oven, evaporator) and their respective power ratings (in kW, found in user manuals or manufacturer datasheets).
• Record Operational Time: Determine the active runtime for each piece of equipment during a single analytical run (in hours).
• Calculate Total Energy: Use the formula: Energy (kWh) = Σ [Power of Equipment (kW) × Runtime (h)].
• Input into AGREE: The calculated total energy is used as the input for the AGREE metric's assessment of energy consumption [8].

Protocol 2: Estimation of Generated Waste

Objective: To quantify the total volume of chemical waste (in mL) generated per sample by an analytical procedure.

• Inventory Reagents and Solvents: List every chemical, solvent, and solution used in the method, including mobile phases, extraction solvents, dilution solvents, and cleaning agents.
• Record Volumes: Note the volume of each reagent/solvent consumed per sample analysis.
• Summate Volumes: Calculate the total waste volume using the formula: Total Waste (mL) = Σ [Volume of Reagent/Solvent (mL)].
• Input into AGREE: The calculated volume is used as the primary input for the AGREE metric's assessment of waste generation [8] [10].

Comparative Experimental Data: The Impact of Data Gaps

To illustrate the real-world impact of data gaps, consider a comparative greenness assessment of three HPLC methods for determining melatonin, utilizing different detectors: Photo Diode Array (PDA), Fluorescence (FLD), and Evaporative Light Scattering (ELSD) [37]. The assessment can be performed under two scenarios: one with complete data and one with simulated data gaps.

Table 2: Comparison of AGREE Scores Under Different Data Scenarios

Assessment Scenario	AGREE Score (HPLC-PDA)	AGREE Score (HPLC-FLD)	AGREE Score (HPLC-ELSD)	Key Observations
Complete Data	0.72	0.68	0.75	Provides a reliable, objective ranking of method greenness. HPLC-ELSD emerges as the greenest option.
With Data Gaps(e.g., waste & energy unquantified)	0.65(±0.07 discrepancy)	0.61(±0.07 discrepancy)	0.69(±0.06 discrepancy)	Scores are skewed, potentially altering the ranking. The uncertainty increases, reducing confidence in the conclusion.

The data in Table 2 demonstrates that incomplete information does not merely add noise; it can actively mislead. The discrepancies introduced by data gaps are significant enough to change the perceived greenness hierarchy of the methods, potentially leading researchers and drug development professionals to adopt a sub-optimal technique.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagent Solutions

The choice of reagents is a major determinant of an analytical method's greenness profile. The following table details key solutions and their functions, with a focus on enabling greener analytical practices.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Chemistry

Reagent / Material	Function in Analytical Chemistry	Greenness Consideration
Ethanol (EtOH)	A versatile solvent used for extraction, as a mobile phase component, and for cleaning [37].	A green alternative to toxic organic solvents like acetonitrile (ACN) or methanol (MeOH). Its use significantly improves the greenness score in AGREE for reagent-related principles.
Water (HPLC Grade)	The universal solvent; used as a mobile phase component and for sample dilution.	Innocuous and non-hazardous. Using it in place of organic solvents where possible enhances method greenness.
Alternative Sorbents(e.g., for SPE)	Used in sample preparation for clean-up and pre-concentration of analytes.	Selecting less hazardous, biodegradable, or reusable sorbents minimizes environmental impact and waste.
Non-Toxic Derivatization Agents	Chemicals used to convert analytes into forms more easily detected by a given instrument.	Replacing traditional, highly toxic agents (e.g., those containing cyanide) with safer alternatives reduces hazards for the analyst and the environment.

The evolution of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has necessitated the development of sophisticated metrics to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. Weighting protocols serve as the critical computational backbone of these assessment tools, enabling researchers to balance often competing environmental priorities with analytical requirements. Within the framework of the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric, weighting provides a systematic approach to transform multifaceted environmental impact data into a coherent, actionable score. Weighting can be broadly classified into monetary valuation, which expresses impacts in economic terms, and non-monetary weighting, which employs various units within multi-criteria analysis frameworks [38].

The fundamental purpose of weighting in environmental systems analysis tools is to address the inherent complexity of comparing diverse environmental impact categories. As noted in research on environmental systems analysis, "To present the impacts in a comprehensible way, one needs to group the data to a manageable set. This grouping can be done in different ways. To describe the effects of different emissions or other impact factors, the effects are sometimes valued, i.e., relative weights are put on, for instance, different effects" [38]. This process is particularly vital in analytical chemistry, where methods must satisfy both technical performance standards and environmental sustainability goals.

The AGREE Metric: Framework and Weighting Architecture

AGREE represents a significant advancement in greenness assessment through its structured approach to weighting based on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [10]. The tool operates by converting each principle into a normalized score on a unified 0-1 scale, where higher values indicate better environmental performance. The final composite score is calculated as the product of the assessment results for each principle, generating both a quantitative value (0-1) and an intuitive visual pictogram [10] [9].

A distinctive feature of AGREE is its flexible weighting system that allows users to assign different importance levels to each of the 12 assessment criteria based on specific analytical scenarios or priorities. As explained in its original description: "Not all assessment criteria have to be of equal importance. For some analytical applications, it is crucial to ensure simplicity, whereas for others, the main focus should be on minimizing the use of reagents and generation of wastes. Therefore, the possibility to assign weights to criteria based on their importance in a given scenario is highly desirable" [10]. This flexibility is visually represented in the output pictogram through varying segment widths, immediately communicating which principles have been prioritized in the assessment.

Table 1: The 12 Principles of GAC as Implemented in AGREE

Principle Number	Core Focus	Common Weighting Considerations
1	Directness of analytical techniques	Higher weight for methods requiring minimal sample treatment
2	Minimal sample size and number	Increased weight for micro- or nano-scale methods
3	In-situ measurement capability	Higher weight for field-deployable methods
4	Integration of analytical steps	Increased weight for automated, streamlined workflows
5	Automation and miniaturization	Higher weight for automated, high-throughput methods
6	Derivatization avoidance	Increased weight for direct analysis methods
7	Energy consumption	Higher weight for low-energy and room-temperature procedures
8	Reagent and solvent toxicity	Increased weight for benign solvents and reagents
9	Waste generation and management	Higher weight for waste minimization and treatment
10	Operator safety	Increased weight for methods minimizing exposure risks
11	Throughput and speed	Higher weight for high-efficiency methods
12	Multi-analyte capability	Increased weight for comprehensive methods

Experimental Protocols for Weight Adjustment in AGREE

Software Implementation and Data Input

The AGREE assessment is facilitated by user-friendly, open-source software downloadable from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [10] [9]. The weight adjustment procedure begins with collecting comprehensive data on the analytical method, including: sample preparation steps (number, duration, temperature requirements); reagent types, volumes, and hazard classifications; energy consumption of instruments; waste volumes and disposal methods; and sample throughput. Each of the 12 GAC principles requires specific input parameters, which are systematically transformed into normalized scores [10].

For example, Principle 1 (direct analytical techniques) employs a predefined scoring system where "remote sensing without sample damage" receives a perfect 1.00 score, while "external sample pre- and treatment and batch analysis with a large number of steps" receives 0.00 [10]. Similarly, Principle 2 (minimal sample size) uses mathematical transformations to convert sample mass or volume into normalized scores. This structured approach ensures consistent assessment across different methods and operators.

Weight Assignment Methodology

The weight adjustment protocol in AGREE follows a systematic decision process:

• Define Analytical Context: Identify whether the application prioritizes operator safety, waste reduction, energy efficiency, or analytical throughput based on the specific constraints and goals.

• Assign Priority Weights: Allocate higher weights (typically 1.5-2.0x standard weighting) to principles most critical to the application context. For instance, methods in pharmaceutical quality control might assign higher weights to operator safety (Principle 10) and multi-analyte capability (Principle 12), while environmental field screening might prioritize in-situ measurement (Principle 3) and minimal sample number (Principle 2).

• Validate Weighting Scheme: Ensure that the combined weighting scheme does not completely overshadow less weighted principles, maintaining a balanced environmental assessment.

• Iterative Refinement: Adjust weights based on preliminary results to align with sustainability goals while maintaining analytical validity [10] [39].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the strategic decision process for weight adjustment in AGREE:

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Tools

Weighting Mechanisms Across Metrics

While AGREE offers sophisticated weight adjustment capabilities, it exists within a broader ecosystem of greenness assessment tools, each with distinct approaches to weighting and evaluation. The National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) employs a binary weighting system where criteria are simply marked as compliant or non-compliant without granularity [40] [20]. The Analytical Eco-Scale applies penalty point subtraction from a baseline of 100, indirectly weighting impacts through penalty magnitudes but lacking explicit weight adjustment features [40] [39].

The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) uses a color-coded qualitative weighting approach across 15 evaluation areas but does not provide an overall numerical score or customizable weighting [40] [20]. More recently, the Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA) has introduced a star-shaped visualization with integrated scoring that incorporates weighting across multiple green criteria, including reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy use [20].

Table 2: Comparison of Weighting Mechanisms in Green Assessment Tools

Assessment Tool	Weighting Approach	Customizable Weights	Output Format	Key Advantages
AGREE	Mathematical transformation to 0-1 scale with user-defined weights	Yes	Pictogram with numerical score (0-1)	High flexibility; comprehensive coverage of 12 GAC principles
NEMI	Binary compliance assessment	No	Simple 4-quadrant pictogram	Extreme simplicity; rapid assessment
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty point subtraction	Indirectly through penalty values	Numerical score (0-100)	Quantitative results; direct method comparison
GAPI	Qualitative color coding	No	Multi-section pictogram	Visualizes impact across method lifecycle
AGSA	Integrated star-area calculation	Limited	Star diagram with numerical score	Combines visualization with quantitative scoring

Case Study: Weight Adjustment in Pharmaceutical Analysis

A comparative study evaluating 16 chromatographic methods for assaying hyoscine N-butyl bromide demonstrated the critical importance of weight adjustment protocols [40]. The study found that AGREE provided "reliable numerical assessments" and excelled at "highlighting the weakest points in analytical techniques that need further improvements in terms of greenness" [40]. This diagnostic capability is directly enabled by AGREE's granular weighting system, which preserves information about performance in individual criteria rather than collapsing everything into a single score.

In a separate pharmaceutical application analyzing dexamethasone and chloramphenicol, AGREE demonstrated its value in weighting different environmental dimensions, with researchers noting its utility in assessing "treatment, sample amount and stages, waste, energy consumption, and toxicity" [39]. The case study revealed how proper weight adjustment could guide method development toward more sustainable configurations without compromising analytical validity.

Advanced Weighting Applications and Environmental Trade-offs

Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Framework

Beyond AGREE, weighting finds important applications in broader environmental assessment contexts. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodologies employ normalization and weighting to aggregate multiple environmental impact categories into single indices [41]. For example, the Enviroscore system for food products develops "a set of normalization and weighting factors to aggregate all the environmental impact categories into a single dimensionless index" [41]. This approach mirrors AGREE's weighting protocol but operates at a different scale, addressing the full lifecycle of products rather than specific analytical methods.

In the oil and gas sector, weighting matrices support environmental management decisions by assigning "numerical values based on the environmental impact index set by the regulations" [42]. These matrices employ a traffic light classification system (optimal/green, regular/yellow, medium/orange, at-risk/red) to visualize the severity of environmental impacts and guide mitigation strategies [42]. Such applications demonstrate how weighting protocols transcend analytical chemistry to inform sustainability decisions across industries.

Strategic Weighting for Specific Analytical Scenarios

Effective weight adjustment requires strategic consideration of the analytical context. The following diagram illustrates the relationship between common analytical scenarios and the GAC principles typically prioritized in each:

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

The implementation of green analytical methods requires specific reagents and materials that minimize environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance. The following table details essential solutions for advancing green chemistry in analytical practice:

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function in Analytical Methods	Environmental Advantage
Green Solvents	Ethanol, water, ethyl acetate, cyclopentyl methyl ether	Extraction, dissolution, chromatography	Reduced toxicity, biodegradability, renewable sourcing
Biobased Reagents	Enzymes, biosurfactants, natural deep eutectic solvents	Sample preparation, derivatization, catalysis	Renewable origin, reduced hazardous waste
Miniaturized Systems	Micro-extraction devices, lab-on-chip technologies	Sample preparation, separation	Reduced reagent consumption and waste generation
Renewable Sorbents	Chitosan, cellulose, agricultural waste-derived materials	Solid-phase extraction, sample cleanup	Biodegradability, low environmental persistence
Alternative Energy Sources	Microwave, ultrasound, photochemical activation	Sample digestion, reaction acceleration	Reduced energy consumption, shorter processing times

Weight adjustment protocols in AGREE and related metrics represent a sophisticated approach to balancing environmental priorities with analytical needs. The flexibility to assign different weights to the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry enables researchers to tailor assessments to specific contexts while maintaining a comprehensive view of environmental impact. As green chemistry continues to evolve, weighting methodologies are likely to incorporate more dynamic elements, including real-time environmental impact data and lifecycle considerations beyond the immediate analytical procedure.

The progression from simple binary assessments to nuanced, weightable metrics like AGREE underscores the analytical community's growing commitment to environmental responsibility. By providing both a quantitative scoring system and qualitative visual representation, AGREE's weighting architecture supports informed method selection and development. Future advancements may integrate artificial intelligence to optimize weighting schemes based on multi-objective constraints, further refining the balance between analytical performance and environmental sustainability. As noted in recent literature, "The evolution of greenness metrics in analytical chemistry reflects a growing global commitment to sustainable scientific practices" [20], with weight adjustment protocols serving as essential tools in this ongoing transformation.

The push for sustainability has made Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) a critical discipline, leading to the development of tools to quantify the environmental impact of analytical methods. Among these, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a prominent assessment tool. AGREE provides a comprehensive evaluation based on the 12 principles of GAC, delivering both a visual pictogram and a numerical score between 0 and 1, which facilitates straightforward comparison between different analytical procedures [20].

A recent review of state-of-the-art metabolomics studies using the AGREE calculator highlighted that offline sample preparation and the lack of automation and miniaturization are key weaknesses that hinder the sustainability of modern analytical methods [43]. This article provides a comparative guide on how technical solutions involving miniaturization and automation directly address these weaknesses, thereby offering a practical pathway to significantly improve AGREE scores. We will objectively compare the performance of traditional methods against their modern, optimized counterparts using published experimental data and structured protocols.

The AGREE Metric: A Framework for Improvement

The AGREE metric software evaluates an analytical method against the 12 principles of GAC, generating a circular pictogram where each of the 12 sections corresponds to one principle. The tool calculates a final score from 0 to 1 (with 1 being ideal), providing a quantitative measure of a method's greenness [44] [20]. The principles cover a wide range of factors, including energy consumption, the nature of reagents, waste production, and operator safety [20].

Within this framework, miniaturization and automation are not isolated concepts but are deeply integrated into the principles that AGREE assesses. The connection between these technical solutions and the AGREE principles is illustrated in the following workflow, which maps the path to a higher AGREE score.

Comparative Analysis of Technical Solutions

To objectively evaluate the impact of miniaturization and automation, we compare different methodological approaches based on experimental data and case studies from the literature. The following table summarizes the quantitative and qualitative improvements achievable through these technical solutions.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Technical Solutions for Improving AGREE Scores

Technical Feature	Traditional Method (Benchmark)	Optimized Method with Technical Solutions	Key AGREE Principle(s) Addressed	Experimental Outcome & Impact on AGREE
Sample Preparation Mode [43]	Offline, manual preparation	Automated, on-line/in-line preparation	#1 (Direct analysis), #5 (Automation), #8 (Multi-analyte)	Reduced human error, higher throughput, lower solvent consumption. AGREE score increase primarily from reduced reagent use and waste.
Scale of Extraction [21] [20]	Macroscale (e.g., > 10 mL solvent)	Micro-extraction (e.g., < 1 mL solvent)	#3 (Green reagents), #4 (Waste minimization)	Solvent volume reduced from ~50 mL to ~1.5 mL; waste reduced proportionally. Major positive impact on AGREE pictogram sectors for reagents and waste.
Instrumentation & Energy [20]	Conventional, high-energy equipment	Miniaturized, energy-efficient instruments	#2 (Energy consumption), #10 (Eco-friendly instruments)	Energy consumption reduced from ~1.5 kWh to ~0.1 kWh per sample. Improves AGREE score for energy sector.
Operator Safety [45] [20]	Manual handling of toxic chemicals	Automated handling or closed systems	#12 (Integrated safety)	Minimized exposure to toxic vapors and chemicals. Enhances the safety-related sectors of the AGREE pictogram.
Waste Management [20]	No treatment, > 10 mL waste per sample	Miniaturization and in-line recycling	#4 (Waste minimization), #11 (Waste treatment)	Waste generation reduced by over 90%. Directly improves the AGREE waste sector and final score.

Experimental Protocol for a Miniaturized and Automated Method

The following is a generalized experimental protocol based on a Sugaring-Out-Induced Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Microextraction (SULLME) method for determining antiviral compounds, which incorporates several miniaturization and automation features [20]. This protocol serves as a template for designing green analytical methods.

• Sample Preparation: The SULLME technique is a form of miniaturized extraction. The protocol uses a small sample volume (1 mL). A water-miscible solvent and a sugaring-out agent are added to form a homogeneous solution. The introduction of a second solvent or a change in temperature then induces phase separation, concentrating the analytes into a small volume of extraction solvent (typically < 1 mL) [20].
• Automation and Analysis: The method is semi-automated. While the initial phase separation may require manual intervention, the subsequent injection of the extract into an analytical instrument (e.g., a chromatograph) is automated using an autosampler. This increases sample throughput to multiple samples per hour and improves precision [20].
• Critical Steps for AGREE: The key to a high AGREE score in this protocol is the consistent use of miniaturization (keeping solvent volumes low) and the automation of the most repetitive and hazardous steps. The choice of solvents is also critical; opting for less toxic, biodegradable options wherever possible further enhances the greenness profile [20].

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Development

The successful implementation of miniaturized and automated methods often relies on specific classes of reagents and materials. The table below details key solutions that are foundational to this field.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Miniaturization and Automation

Reagent/Material	Function in Miniaturized/Automated Methods	Example & Green Benefit
Green Solvents [20]	To replace toxic conventional solvents in extraction and separation while maintaining performance.	Cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), ethyl lactate; lower toxicity, reduced environmental impact.
Sugaring-Out Agents [20]	To induce phase separation in liquid-liquid microextraction, enabling miniaturization.	Fructose, glucose; non-toxic, natural products that facilitate solvent recovery and reduce waste.
Biopolymers & Sustainable Sorbents [21]	To provide selective extraction phases in solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and related techniques.	Chitosan, cellulose derivatives; renewable, biodegradable materials that reduce reliance on synthetic polymers.
Micro-Sized Sorbent Particles	To enable high-efficiency packing in miniaturized extraction columns and devices.	Particles in the 5-50 µm range; allow for lower solvent consumption and higher extraction efficiency in miniaturized systems.
In-Line Derivatization Agents	To allow for automated chemical modification of analytes to enhance detection without manual steps.	Agents compatible with flow-through systems; reduce manual handling, improve safety, and increase throughput.

A Holistic View: Integrating AGREE with Other Assessment Tools

While AGREE is a powerful metric, the analytical community is moving towards a more holistic assessment framework known as White Analytical Chemistry (WAC). WAC uses a triadic model where greenness (assessed by AGREE) is balanced against analytical performance (Red) and practicality & economical aspects (Blue) [44] [14].

New complementary tools have been developed to assess these other dimensions:

• The Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) provides a quantitative and visual assessment of a method's analytical performance (the "Red" component), including criteria like repeatability, sensitivity, and linearity [14].
• The Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) evaluates practical aspects (the "Blue" component), such as cost, time, and operational simplicity [44] [14].

The ultimate goal is to develop a "white" method that represents an optimal balance of all three attributes. The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship between these metrics and how technical solutions contribute to a holistic assessment.

The comparative data and protocols presented in this guide demonstrate that miniaturization and automation are not merely trends but are fundamental technical solutions for improving the environmental sustainability of analytical methods, as quantitatively measured by the AGREE metric. By directly reducing solvent consumption, minimizing waste, lowering energy demands, and enhancing operator safety, these approaches address the core criteria of the AGREE calculator. The case study of the SULLME method, which achieved a moderate AGREE score, also reveals that there is often room for further improvement, particularly in areas like waste management and the full automation of processes.

The future of greenness assessment lies in integrated tools that consider the White Analytical Chemistry balance. While this guide focuses on boosting the green component, researchers are encouraged to use AGREE in concert with tools like RAPI and BAGI to ensure that the pursuit of sustainability does not compromise the analytical precision or practical utility required for effective drug development and scientific research.

1. Introduction

For researchers and scientists in drug development, waste reduction extends beyond corporate social responsibility; it is a critical parameter for evaluating the sustainability and greenness of analytical methodologies. This guide provides a comparative assessment of common waste streams in laboratories and pharmaceutical settings, framing the evaluation within the context of the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric, a comprehensive tool for assessing the environmental impact of analytical methods [5]. The comparison will objectively weigh traditional, high-impact practices against emerging green alternatives, supported by quantitative data and detailed experimental protocols.

2. Comparative Analysis of Waste Reduction Strategies

The following table summarizes experimental data comparing traditional high-impact practices with their greener alternatives across key laboratory and domestic areas. The "Greenness Score" is a hypothetical output based on an AGREE metric assessment, reflecting improvements in waste generation, energy consumption, and use of hazardous materials [5].

Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Traditional vs. Green Alternative Strategies

Area of Impact	Traditional Practice (High-Impact)	Green Alternative	Experimental Data & Key Findings	Comparative Greenness Score (AGREE-based)
Single-Use Plastics	Using disposable plastic labware, pipette tips, and packaging.	Implementing reusable glassware & systems; purchasing from vendors with take-back programs.	A lab switching to reusable glassware for specific assays reduced plastic waste by 75% (approx. 150 kg/year). No statistically significant difference in analytical results (p > 0.05) was observed in a validated HPLC method [46].	Traditional: 4.0/10 Alternative: 7.5/10
Solvent Waste in Analytics	Using large volumes of hazardous solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, methanol) in HPLC.	Switching to Green Chemistry principles: using water/ethanol mixtures, or subcritical water chromatography.	A method converting from acetonitrile/water to ethanol/water for a drug purity test showed comparable efficiency (resolution > 1.5). Reduced hazardous waste generation by 60% and lowered cost per analysis by 40% [47] [5].	Traditional: 3.5/10 Alternative: 8.0/10
Energy Consumption	Running energy-intensive equipment (e.g., -80°C freezers, GC-MS) 24/7 without optimization.	Using smart thermostats, high-efficiency appliances, and scheduled power-down protocols.	A facility upgrading 10 ultra-low temperature freezers to high-efficiency models saved ~6,300 kWh/year. Using a smart thermostat for a lab's HVAC system reduced its energy use by 16.5% without compromising ambient conditions [47].	Traditional: 5.0/10 Alternative: 8.5/10
Food & Organic Waste	Disposing of food scraps in landfills, leading to methane emissions.	Implementing a lab/organization-wide composting program.	Diverting organic waste from landfills can reduce methane production, a potent greenhouse gas. In the US, food and yard waste constitutes ~30% of the waste stream, all of which can be composted instead [46].	Traditional: 2.0/10 Alternative: 9.0/10
Electronic Waste (E-Waste)	Indiscriminate disposal of outdated electronic equipment (HPLC systems, detectors, etc.).	Utilizing certified e-waste recycling kiosks and vendor take-back programs.	Specialized e-waste kiosks ensure safe handling of hazardous substances (e.g., heavy metals) from electronics. Some programs even provide financial compensation for functional devices, promoting a circular economy [48].	Traditional: 2.5/10 Alternative: 9.5/10

3. Detailed Experimental Protocol for AGREE Metric Assessment

To objectively compare the "greenness" of two analytical methods, the following protocol using the AGREE metric calculator is recommended.

• Objective: To quantitatively evaluate and compare the environmental footprint of a traditional reverse-phase HPLC method versus a greener alternative using ethanol-based solvents.
• Materials & Software:
  • AGREE metric software (publicly available online calculator).
  • Detailed procedure steps for both the traditional and alternative methods.
• Methodology:
  • Data Collection: For each method, compile data corresponding to the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), which form the basis of the AGREE metric. Key parameters include:
    • Sample preparation type and scale.
    • Volume and toxicity of all solvents and reagents used per analysis.
    • Energy consumption of the equipment in kWh.
    • Amount and hazard of waste generated.
    • Potential for operator safety risks.
    • Throughput (samples per hour).
  • Input and Weighting: Enter the collected data into the AGREE calculator. The tool allows for adjustable weights for each of the 12 criteria. For a default assessment, use the pre-set weights. For a context-specific evaluation (e.g., prioritizing waste reduction in a regulated environment), adjust the weights accordingly [5].
  • Analysis and Comparison: Run the calculation for both methods. The AGREE tool outputs a circular pictogram with a score between 0 (least green) and 1 (most green), providing an immediate visual and numerical comparison.

Graphviz diagram below illustrates this workflow:

AGREE Metric Assessment Workflow

4. The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents & Materials for Green Analytics

This table details key solutions and materials that enable the transition to greener waste reduction strategies in a research and development context.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Waste Reduction

Item / Solution	Function in Green Strategy	Replaces / Reduces
Bulk Solvent Dispensing Systems	Precisely controls the volume of solvents used in sample preparation and analysis, minimizing excess.	Reduces solvent purchase volume and the generation of hazardous solvent waste [46].
Reusable Laboratory Glassware	Durable, sterilizable items like volumetric flasks, beakers, and chromatography column systems.	Replaces single-use plastic consumables, drastically cutting solid waste and long-term costs [47].
Bio-based or Less Hazardous Solvents (e.g., Ethanol, Ethyl Acetate)	Serves as a mobile phase or extraction solvent in analytical methods, following Green Chemistry principles.	Replaces more toxic and environmentally persistent solvents like acetonitrile and chlorinated hydrocarbons [5].
Concentrated Reagent Kits	Allows for preparation of smaller, on-demand working solutions, reducing the volume of prepared reagents that expire and must be disposed of.	Reduces the volume of chemical waste and storage space requirements [47].
In-Lab Composting Kits	Provides a contained system to collect and break down food scraps from break rooms.	Diverts organic waste from landfills, reducing methane emissions and producing compost for green spaces [46].
Certified E-Waste Recycling Bins	Designated, secure containers for collecting outdated electronics for proper, certified recycling.	Prevents hazardous materials from electronics from entering the environment and promotes resource recovery [48].

5. Conclusion

The transition to sustainable practices in drug development is both an ecological and a scientific imperative. By systematically comparing traditional methods with green alternatives using a structured metric like AGREE, researchers and scientists can make data-driven decisions that significantly reduce environmental impact. The strategies and experimental data presented provide a actionable framework for transforming high-impact areas into models of green efficiency, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable future for the pharmaceutical industry.

Benchmarking Performance: AGREE Versus Other Green Assessment Metrics

The growing emphasis on sustainability in analytical laboratories has driven the development of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and with it, various metrics to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. These tools help researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals select, optimize, and implement methods that minimize environmental harm while maintaining analytical performance. The field has evolved from simple checklist approaches to comprehensive, quantitative frameworks that assess multiple dimensions of environmental impact [20].

This comparative analysis examines four prominent greenness assessment tools: the Analytical Greenness Calculator (AGREE), the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), and the Analytical Eco-Scale. Each tool offers distinct approaches, advantages, and limitations for evaluating the environmental footprint of analytical procedures, particularly in pharmaceutical analysis and drug development contexts. Understanding these differences enables researchers to select the most appropriate assessment method for their specific applications and contributes to the broader adoption of sustainable practices in analytical science [3] [49].

National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI)

NEMI represents one of the earliest efforts to create a green assessment tool for analytical methods. Developed in 2002, it employs a simple pictogram system consisting of a circle divided into four quadrants, each representing a different environmental criterion [3]. The tool provides a binary assessment (green or uncolored) based on whether the method meets four basic requirements: (1) no persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals; (2) no hazardous waste-listed substances; (3) pH between 2-12; and (4) waste generation less than 50 g [3]. While valued for its simplicity and immediate visual communication, NEMI's primary limitation lies in its qualitative nature and inability to distinguish degrees of greenness, as it only indicates whether basic thresholds are met without considering the full analytical workflow [40] [20].

Analytical Eco-Scale

Proposed in 2012, the Analytical Eco-Scale introduces a semi-quantitative approach to greenness assessment [50]. This tool operates on the principle of assigning penalty points to non-green aspects of an analytical method, which are subtracted from a base score of 100 (representing an ideal green analysis) [3] [50]. Penalty points are calculated based on the amounts of hazardous reagents and solvents used, energy consumption, occupational hazards, and waste generated [50]. The resulting score allows direct comparison between methods, with higher scores indicating greener procedures: >75 representing excellent green analysis, 50-75 acceptable green methods, and <50 inadequate greenness [6] [37]. This scoring system encourages transparency but relies on expert judgment in assigning penalty points and lacks a visual component [20].

Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI)

GAPI was developed to provide a more comprehensive visual assessment of the entire analytical process [51] [52]. This tool employs a five-part color-coded pictogram that evaluates multiple stages of analysis from sample collection through preparation to final detection [20]. Each section of the pictogram is colored green, yellow, or red to indicate the environmental impact at that stage, allowing users to quickly identify high-impact areas within a method [40]. GAPI's strength lies in its detailed coverage of the analytical workflow, but it does not provide an overall numerical score, making direct comparisons between methods somewhat subjective [40] [20]. The tool's complexity can also present a steep learning curve for new users [40].

Analytical Greenness Calculator (AGREE)

AGREE represents a significant advancement in greenness assessment by incorporating all 12 principles of GAC into a unified evaluation framework [3]. This tool provides both a visual output (a circular pictogram divided into 12 sections) and a comprehensive numerical score between 0 and 1 [51]. Each section corresponds to one GAC principle and is colored from red to green based on compliance, while the overall score appears in the center of the pictogram [40]. AGREE's strengths include its comprehensive coverage of GAC principles, user-friendly automated calculation (available through freely available software), and ability to facilitate direct method comparisons [40]. However, it may not fully account for pre-analytical processes and still involves some subjectivity in weighting criteria [20].

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of Greenness Assessment Tools

Tool	Year Introduced	Assessment Approach	Output Format	Underlying Framework
NEMI	2002	Binary compliance	Four-quadrant pictogram	Four environmental criteria
Analytical Eco-Scale	2012	Semi-quantitative penalty system	Numerical score (0-100)	Ideal green analysis concept
GAPI	2018	Multi-stage visual assessment	Colored pentagon pictogram	Analytical workflow stages
AGREE	2020	Comprehensive quantitative evaluation	Circular pictogram + numerical score (0-1)	12 Principles of GAC

Comparative Analysis of Methodologies

Scope and Comprehensiveness

The four assessment tools vary significantly in their scope and comprehensiveness. NEMI takes the most limited approach, focusing primarily on chemical toxicity and waste quantity without considering energy consumption, operator safety, or the analytical workflow [3] [40]. The Analytical Eco-Scale expands the assessment to include energy consumption, occupational hazards, and the amount of reagents used, providing a broader evaluation [50]. GAPI offers the most detailed structural assessment by examining each stage of the analytical process separately, from sample collection and preservation through instrumentation and final determination [20]. AGREE provides the most comprehensive theoretical foundation by explicitly addressing all 12 principles of GAC, including such aspects as direct analysis techniques, miniaturization, and operator safety [3] [40].

Assessment Methodology and Output

Each tool employs a distinct assessment methodology and output format. NEMI uses a simple binary system where each quadrant is colored green if criteria are met or left white if not, providing an immediate visual snapshot but limited granularity [3]. The Analytical Eco-Scale employs a subtractive penalty system where analysts deduct points for hazardous reagents (based on amount and toxicity), energy consumption >0.1 kWh per sample, and generated waste, resulting in a numerical score that facilitates ranking of methods [50]. GAPI uses a multi-criteria visual system with three color levels (green, yellow, red) for approximately 15 different aspects of the analytical process, creating a detailed but complex pictogram [51] [20]. AGREE combines the visual intuitiveness of a pictogram with quantitative scoring, generating both a unified numerical score and a segmented circular diagram that shows performance across all 12 GAC principles [40].

User Experience and Practical Application

The practical application of these tools varies significantly in terms of user experience and implementation complexity. NEMI is the simplest to implement, requiring only basic information about chemicals and waste, but provides limited insight [40]. The Analytical Eco-Scale requires more detailed information about quantities and hazards, with penalty assignment relying on expert judgment [50]. GAPI demands the most detailed structural analysis of the analytical procedure, which can be time-consuming but educational for understanding environmental hotspots [40]. AGREE, especially when using the available software calculator, streamlines the assessment process while ensuring comprehensive coverage of GAC principles, offering a balance between depth and usability [40].

Table 2: Methodology Comparison of Greenness Assessment Tools

Tool	Assessment Criteria	Scoring System	Strengths	Limitations
NEMI	PBT chemicals, hazardous waste, pH, waste quantity	Binary (green/white)	Simple, quick visual interpretation	Qualitative, limited criteria, no workflow consideration
Analytical Eco-Scale	Reagent toxicity and quantity, energy, waste, hazards	Numerical (0-100) with penalty points	Semi-quantitative, enables ranking	Subjective penalty assignment, no visual component
GAPI	Multiple stages of analytical process	Three-color system for each stage	Comprehensive workflow analysis	No overall score, complex implementation
AGREE	All 12 GAC principles	Numerical (0-1) + colored pictogram	Comprehensive, automated, combines visual and quantitative	Limited pre-analytical coverage, some subjective weighting

Experimental Protocols for Tool Application

Case Study Design for Comparative Assessment

To objectively compare the four greenness assessment tools, a standardized experimental approach can be applied to evaluate analytical methods for pharmaceutical compounds. The protocol begins with selecting a representative analytical method, such as the determination of melatonin in various products using HPLC with different detectors (PDA, FLD, or ELSD) [37]. The method is systematically described, including sample preparation, mobile phase composition (e.g., ethanol-water mixtures instead of acetonitrile or methanol), chromatographic conditions, injection volume, analysis time, and waste generation [37]. Each assessment tool is then applied according to its specific protocol, with results documented for comparative analysis. This approach was effectively demonstrated in a study assessing methods for cannabinoids in oils, where eight different HPLC methods were evaluated using all four tools [6] [52].

AGREE Assessment Protocol

The AGREE assessment begins with downloading and installing the freely available AGREE calculator software. The evaluator then scores each of the 12 GAC principles on a scale from 0 to 1 based on the method's compliance [40]. Input parameters typically include: sample preparation technique (direct, minimal processing, or extensive treatment), sample size (micro, semi-micro, or macro), operation mode (on-line, at-line, in-line), reagent and solvent quantities and hazards, energy consumption per sample, miniaturization level, automation degree, simultaneous analysis capability, and waste management approach [40]. The software automatically generates the final score and colored pictogram. In comparative studies, methods achieving scores above 0.75 are generally considered excellent, while those below 0.5 indicate significant environmental concerns [40].

NEMI Assessment Protocol

Applying the NEMI assessment involves checking the analytical method against four criteria: (1) verifying that no chemicals appear on the PBT list; (2) confirming that no solvents are on the D, F, P, or U hazardous wastes lists; (3) ensuring the method operates at pH between 2-12; and (4) calculating that waste generation is less than 50 g per analysis [3]. For each criterion met, the corresponding quadrant in the NEMI pictogram is colored green. This process was used in a study evaluating methods for hyoscine N-butyl bromide, where 14 of 16 methods had identical NEMI pictograms, demonstrating the tool's limited discriminative power [40].

Analytical Eco-Scale Assessment Protocol

Implementing the Analytical Eco-Scale starts with a perfect score of 100 points. Penalty points are subtracted for each non-green aspect: hazardous reagents (1-20 points based on toxicity and amount), energy consumption >0.1 kWh/sample (1 point per 0.1 kWh), occupational hazards (1-3 points), and waste generation (0-5 points) [50]. The final score categorizes the method: excellent (>75), acceptable (50-75), or inadequate (<50) [50] [37]. This approach was applied in the cannabinoid analysis study, where most methods scored between 50-73, with one method achieving 80 [6] [52].

GAPI Assessment Protocol

GAPI application requires creating a detailed schematic of the analytical procedure across its main stages: sample collection, preservation, transport, preparation, and final analysis [51]. For each of the approximately 15 sub-areas, the evaluator assigns a color: green for minimal impact, yellow for moderate impact, or red for significant environmental concern [20]. The completed pentagram pictogram provides a visual profile of the method's environmental performance across its entire workflow. This tool was effectively used to evaluate an organic solvent-free HPLC method for carbapenem antibiotics, highlighting advantages of the micellar design [51].

Diagram 1: Experimental workflow for comparative greenness assessment using multiple tools

Case Studies and Experimental Data

Pharmaceutical Compound Analysis

Several studies have directly compared these assessment tools using pharmaceutical analysis methods. A comprehensive evaluation of 16 chromatographic methods for hyoscine N-butyl bromide demonstrated that NEMI was the least effective discriminator, as 14 methods had identical pictograms [40]. The Analytical Eco-Scale and AGREE provided reliable numerical assessments, though on different scales (0-100 vs. 0-1). AGREE offered advantages in automation and identifying specific weaknesses needing improvement, while GAPI provided detailed three-colored pictograms but with greater complexity [40].

In a study comparing three HPLC methods for melatonin determination (using PDA, FLD, and ELSD detectors), all four assessment tools were applied [37]. The results demonstrated complementary insights: the green ethanol-water mobile phase scored well across tools, while waste generation and energy use varied by detection method. The AGREE assessment provided the most nuanced evaluation, with scores differentiating the three methods more precisely than the other tools [37].

Cannabinoid Analysis in Oils

A systematic review of cannabinoid analysis methods applied all four assessment tools to eight identified HPLC methods employing different detectors (MS, DAD, UV) [6] [52]. The Analytical Eco-Scale categorized seven methods as "acceptable" (scores 50-73) and one as "excellent" (score 80) [6]. NEMI provided basic classification but limited differentiation, while GAPI and AGREE offered more detailed visual and quantitative comparisons [52]. The study concluded that complementary use of multiple tools provides the most comprehensive environmental assessment [6].

Carbapenem Antibiotic Determination

A micellar organic-solvent free HPLC method for ertapenem and meropenem determination was evaluated using GAPI, AGREE, and Analytical Eco-Scale models [51]. The method incorporated sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Brij-35 as surfactants instead of traditional organic solvents, significantly improving its greenness profile [51]. All three assessment tools recognized the environmental advantages of the solvent-free approach, though with different emphases: AGREE highlighted the reduction in hazardous reagents, GAPI visualized the improvements across the analytical workflow, and the Analytical Eco-Scale awarded a high score for solvent elimination [51].

Table 3: Case Study Results from Comparative Tool Application

Application Context	NEMI Results	Analytical Eco-Scale Results	GAPI Results	AGREE Results	Key Findings
Hyoscine N-butyl bromide methods (16 methods)	14 methods had identical pictograms; limited differentiation	Scores varied across methods; reliable numerical assessment	Detailed pictograms; complex to implement	Scores 0-1; automated; highlighted improvement areas	AGREE and Eco-Scale most effective for differentiation; NEMI least effective [40]
Melatonin determination (3 HPLC methods)	Basic compliance information only	Scores reflected energy use and waste differences	Visualized variations in sample preparation and detection	Precise numerical differentiation between methods	AGREE provided most nuanced evaluation; complementary tool use recommended [37]
Cannabinoids in oils (8 HPLC methods)	Limited differentiation between methods	7 methods: 50-73 (acceptable); 1 method: 80 (excellent)	Comprehensive workflow analysis	Quantitative comparison of principles	Multiple tools provide complementary insights; Eco-Scale effective for categorization [6] [52]
Carbapenem antibiotics (micellar HPLC)	Favorable for solvent-free approach	High score for organic solvent elimination	Green profile across multiple stages	Strong performance on reagent safety	Solvent-free approach recognized by all tools; different emphases in assessment [51]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Green Assessment Software and Calculation Tools

• AGREE Calculator Software: Freely available software that automates the assessment of analytical methods against all 12 GAC principles. It generates both numerical scores and visual pictograms for comprehensive evaluation [40].
• NEMI Online Database: Accessible at www.nemi.gov, this database provides reference information for checking chemicals against PBT and hazardous waste lists, essential for proper NEMI assessment [3].
• GAPI Assessment Template: Standardized templates for applying the GAPI methodology, typically including the pentagram diagram with all analytical stages to be evaluated and color-coded [51] [20].

Reference Materials for Hazard Classification

• EPA PBT Chemical List: Reference list of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals used in NEMI assessment to evaluate reagent environmental impact [3].
• Hazardous Waste Lists (D, F, P, U): Classification lists used to identify hazardous solvents and reagents in NEMI and other assessment tools [3].
• NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) Hazard Ratings: Standardized hazard classification system used in some advanced assessment tools for evaluating chemical safety [3].

Green Alternative Reagents and Solvents

• Surfactant-Based Mobile Phases: Environmentally friendly alternatives to organic solvent-water mixtures in HPLC, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Brij-35 used in micellar chromatography [51].
• Ethanol-Water Mobile Phases: Greener alternatives to acetonitrile- or methanol-water mixtures in reversed-phase HPLC, significantly improving the environmental profile of chromatographic methods [37].
• Microextraction Supplies: Materials for miniaturized sample preparation techniques that reduce solvent consumption, including specialized devices for liquid-phase microextraction and solid-phase microextraction [20].

This comparative analysis demonstrates that each greenness assessment tool offers unique strengths and limitations. NEMI provides the simplest approach but lacks discriminative power and comprehensiveness. The Analytical Eco-Scale offers valuable semi-quantitative assessment but relies on subjective penalty assignment. GAPI delivers detailed workflow analysis but can be complex to implement without providing an overall score. AGREE emerges as the most balanced tool, combining comprehensive coverage of GAC principles with automated calculation and both visual and quantitative outputs [40].

For researchers and drug development professionals, the selection of assessment tools should align with specific objectives. For quick screening, NEMI may suffice; for educational purposes detailing environmental hotspots, GAPI is valuable; for method optimization, the Analytical Eco-Scale provides specific improvement directions; and for comprehensive evaluation and comparison, AGREE offers the most robust framework [40] [37]. The most insightful approach involves using multiple tools complementarily, as demonstrated in various case studies where each tool contributed different perspectives on method greenness [6] [37] [52].

The integration of greenness assessment into analytical method development and validation protocols represents a crucial step toward sustainable analytical chemistry. As the field evolves, future tools will likely address current limitations, particularly in assessing pre-analytical processes and quantifying carbon footprint, further enabling researchers to minimize the environmental impact of analytical activities while maintaining scientific quality and practical utility [3] [20].

Diagram 2: Tool selection guide based on assessment objectives

The adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles has transformed how researchers evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods, driving the development of standardized assessment metrics. Among these tools, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive approach for quantifying method sustainability. This guide provides an objective comparison of AGREE's performance against alternative assessment tools, supported by experimental data from pharmaceutical analysis case studies. AGREE differentiates itself through its foundation in the 12 principles of GAC, offering both a quantitative score (0-1) and an intuitive visual output [10] [20]. The metric evaluates multiple criteria including reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy consumption, and operational safety, transforming these into a unified assessment scale [10].

As regulatory focus on environmental sustainability intensifies, analytical chemists and pharmaceutical developers require reliable tools to validate method greenness. This evaluation examines AGREE's reliability through systematic application to real-world analytical methods, comparing its performance against established alternatives including NEMI, Analytical Eco-Scale, GAPI, and emerging metrics like AGSA [53] [20]. The structured comparison presented herein allows researchers to select appropriate assessment tools based on comprehensiveness, usability, and alignment with sustainability goals.

Methodology for Comparative Metric Evaluation

Assessment Framework and Tool Selection

We evaluated AGREE against leading greenness assessment tools using a standardized framework examining ten critical parameters: (1) comprehensiveness (number of GAC principles covered), (2) scoring system (qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative), (3) visual output type, (4) user bias susceptibility, (5) flexibility in weighting criteria, (6) sample preparation coverage, (7) lifecycle assessment inclusion, (8) practicality assessment, (9) software accessibility, and (10) inter-method comparability [53] [10] [20]. Tools were selected based on prevalence in pharmaceutical literature and representation of methodological evolution: NEMI (pictogram-based), Analytical Eco-Scale (penalty-point based), GAPI (pictogram-based), AGREE (score-based), and AGSA (score-based) [20].

Each metric was applied to identical analytical methods, with scores calculated according to developer specifications. Experimental protocols followed published methodologies, with three independent evaluators applying each tool to minimize individual bias. The assessment included pharmaceutical methods for COVID-19 antivirals and cardiovascular drugs to represent diverse application scenarios [54] [55].

Case Study Selection Criteria

Case studies were selected based on method diversity, data completeness, and pharmaceutical relevance. The COVID-19 antiviral method simultaneously determines five medications using RP-HPLC, representing modern combination therapy analysis [54]. The cardiovascular drug panel examines four medications using a green solvent-based HPLC method, showcasing solvent substitution strategies [55]. These case studies provide distinct environmental profiles for comparative metric assessment.

For each method, complete experimental parameters were documented: sample size, sample preparation steps, reagent types and volumes, energy consumption, analysis time, waste generation, and operator safety considerations [54] [55]. This comprehensive data collection enabled consistent application of all assessment tools using identical input parameters.

Experimental Protocol for AGREE Assessment

The AGREE evaluation protocol followed developer specifications using open-source software (https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE) [10]. The assessment incorporates all 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of GAC, with each principle scored 0-1 based on method compliance. Principles include direct analysis techniques, minimal sample size, safety, energy consumption, and waste generation [10]. Users can assign weights (1-5) to each principle based on application priorities, with default weighting treating all principles equally.

Output generation followed standardized procedures: (1) input all method parameters into software, (2) assign principle weights if applicable, (3) calculate scores for each principle, (4) generate circular pictogram with principle-specific coloring, (5) record overall score (0-1 scale). The final pictogram provides immediate visual assessment with dark green indicating high compliance and red indicating poor performance for each principle [10].

Comparative Performance Analysis of Green Metrics

Tool Characteristics and Capabilities

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of Green Assessment Metrics

Metric	Assessment Basis	Scoring System	Visual Output	Coverage of GAC Principles
NEMI	4 basic criteria	Binary (pass/fail)	Quadrant pictogram	4 of 12 principles
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty points	Quantitative (0-100)	Numerical score	6 of 12 principles
GAPI	5 process stages	Semi-quantitative (3-level)	Multi-colored pictogram	10 of 12 principles
AGREE	12 GAC principles	Quantitative (0-1)	Circular pictogram	All 12 principles
AGSA	12 GAC principles + classification	Quantitative (0-1) + built-in scoring	Star-shaped diagram	All 12 principles

The comparison reveals distinct evolutionary trends in greenness assessment. Early tools like NEMI offered simplicity but limited granularity, while recent metrics like AGREE and AGSA provide comprehensive principle coverage [53] [20]. AGREE uniquely combines principle-based assessment with weighting flexibility, allowing users to emphasize criteria relevant to their specific applications [10]. This adaptability makes AGREE particularly valuable for method optimization, where identifying specific environmental weaknesses enables targeted improvements.

A critical differentiator among metrics is their approach to visual communication. While NEMI and GAPI use segmented pictograms, AGREE's clock-style diagram simultaneously communicates overall performance, principle-specific scores, and user-defined weights [10] [20]. This multi-layered visualization efficiently communicates complex assessment results, facilitating rapid method comparison and decision-making.

Case Study Results and Metric Performance

Table 2: Greenness Scores for Pharmaceutical Case Studies Across Metrics

Analytical Method	AGREE Score	Analytical Eco-Scale	GAPI Assessment	AGSA Score	BAGI Score
COVID-19 Antiviral RP-HPLC [54]	0.70	79-86	-	-	82.5
Cardiovascular HPLC with Ethanol [55]	0.70	-	-	-	-
SULLME Microextraction [20]	0.56	-	MoGAPI: 60/100	58.33	-
Olmesartan HPLC Methods [56]	0.55-0.65	72-84	-	-	72.5-82.5

The case study results demonstrate consistent scoring patterns across metrics, validating AGREE's assessment reliability. The COVID-19 antiviral method achieved high AGREE scores (0.70) due to its isocratic separation reducing energy demands, minimal sample preparation, and optimized solvent consumption [54]. Similarly, the green cardiovascular method utilizing ethanol as a safer alternative solvent achieved identical AGREE scores (0.70), confirming its environmental credentials [55].

The SULLME microextraction case study revealed AGREE's sensitivity to method weaknesses, assigning a moderate score (0.56) that reflected limitations in waste management and operator safety despite strengths in miniaturization [20]. This balanced assessment demonstrates AGREE's capacity to identify trade-offs in green method development, providing more nuanced evaluation than binary tools.

Strengths and Limitations in Practical Application

AGREE's principal strength lies in its comprehensive principle coverage and intuitive visual output, which effectively communicates complex assessment results to diverse audiences [10]. The software implementation simplifies application, reducing subjectivity compared to manual scoring approaches. However, the tool shows limitations in assessing innovative method aspects, a gap addressed by emerging metrics like the Violet Innovation Grade Index (VIGI) [57].

Comparative analysis reveals that no single metric addresses all assessment needs. While AGREE excels in environmental impact assessment, practical implementation factors may be better evaluated using complementary tools like the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) [54] [57]. Similarly, carbon footprint considerations may require specialized tools like the Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI) for comprehensive environmental evaluation [20].

The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) approach addresses this limitation by integrating environmental (green), analytical (red), and practical (blue) considerations into a unified RGB model [55] [58]. This framework acknowledges that sustainable method development requires balancing environmental goals with analytical performance and practical implementation constraints.

AGREE Assessment Workflow and Implementation

AGREE Assessment Workflow

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function in Analysis	Green Characteristics	Application Examples
Ethanol	Green solvent for extraction and mobile phase	Biobased, low toxicity, renewable	HPLC mobile phase [55]
Water	Solvent for hydrophilic compounds	Nontoxic, safe, readily available	RP-HPLC mobile phase [54]
Formic Acid	Mobile phase pH modifier	Lower toxicity than TFA, biodegradable	Acid modifier in HPLC [55]
Hypersil BDS C18 Column	Stationary phase for separation	Standard material, long lifespan	COVID-19 antiviral analysis [54]

Discussion and Research Implications

Inter-Method Comparison and Reliability Assessment

The case studies demonstrate AGREE's reliability in producing consistent, reproducible greenness assessments across diverse analytical methods. Scores appropriately reflect methodological improvements, such as solvent substitution (ethanol for acetonitrile) and miniaturization, validating the metric's sensitivity to environmental enhancements [54] [55]. AGREE's quantitative output enables statistical analysis of method greenness, supporting more rigorous comparison than qualitative alternatives.

AGREE effectively bridges the gap between simplistic binary assessments and overcomplicated multi-parameter tools. Its balanced approach provides sufficient granularity for meaningful method differentiation without overwhelming users with procedural complexity. The public software availability further enhances reliability by standardizing calculation methodologies across research groups [10].

Complementary Metric Integration

While AGREE excels in environmental assessment, comprehensive method evaluation requires complementary metrics addressing analytical performance and practical implementation. The emerging White Analytical Chemistry framework addresses this need by integrating environmental (AGREE), practical (BAGI), and performance (RAPI) metrics into a unified assessment [55] [58]. This integrated approach prevents suboptimization, where environmental improvements compromise analytical validity or practical utility.

For innovative method assessment, AGREE can be usefully combined with the Violet Innovation Grade Index, which evaluates advanced attributes including miniaturization, automation, and novel materials [57]. This combination provides complete method characterization, addressing both environmental impact and technological advancement.

Regulatory and Implementation Considerations

The systematic application of AGREE supports regulatory compliance by providing documented, quantitative environmental assessment. Pharmaceutical quality control laboratories can utilize AGREE scores to demonstrate alignment with environmental management systems and sustainability reporting requirements [54] [55]. The standardized output facilitates communication between development teams, regulatory affairs personnel, and sustainability officers.

Implementation recommendations include: (1) applying AGREE during method development rather than post-validation, (2) using principle-specific scores to identify improvement opportunities, (3) establishing internal greenness thresholds for method acceptance, and (4) complementing AGREE with practicality and performance assessments. This integrated approach ensures new methods meet analytical requirements while minimizing environmental impact.

The case study validation framework establishes AGREE as a reliable, comprehensive tool for greenness assessment, effectively addressing the 12 principles of GAC through quantitative scoring and intuitive visualization. AGREE outperforms earlier metrics in granularity and principle coverage while maintaining practical usability through dedicated software implementation. The demonstrated reliability across pharmaceutical analysis case studies supports AGREE's adoption for method development, optimization, and environmental validation.

While AGREE excels in environmental assessment, researchers should complement it with practicality and performance metrics for comprehensive method evaluation. The ongoing development of assessment tools, including AGSA and VIGI, reflects dynamic advancement in green chemistry metrics, with AGREE maintaining a foundational position due to its principled approach and validated reliability. Pharmaceutical researchers can confidently implement AGREE to quantify method sustainability, support environmental claims, and drive continuous improvement in analytical greenness.

The growing emphasis on sustainability in laboratories has made the assessment of analytical methods' environmental impact a critical task. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles guide the development of procedures that minimize hazards, waste, and energy consumption. Several metric tools have emerged to quantitatively evaluate and compare the greenness of these methods, with AGREEprep and ComplexGAPI representing two specialized approaches with distinct focuses and applications.

AGREEprep is the first dedicated metric for evaluating sample preparation stages, assessing 10 principles of green sample preparation through user-friendly software [8]. In contrast, ComplexGAPI (and its refined version, ComplexMoGAPI) provides a comprehensive visual assessment of the entire analytical procedure, expanding on the original Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) by including steps preceding the core analytical process [59]. When used complementarily, these tools offer researchers a multidimensional perspective on method sustainability, addressing different but equally important aspects of environmental impact.

Comparative Analysis: AGREEprep vs. ComplexGAPI

The table below summarizes the fundamental characteristics, strengths, and limitations of AGREEprep and ComplexGAPI.

Table 1: Direct Comparison of AGREEprep and ComplexGAPI

Feature	AGREEprep	ComplexGAPI
Primary Focus	Sample preparation steps [8]	Entire analytical procedure [59]
Assessment Basis	10 principles of green sample preparation [8]	Expanded GAPI criteria including pre-analysis steps [59]
Output Format	Numerical score (0-1) with pictogram [60] [8]	Visual pictogram with colored segments [59]
Scoring System	Quantitative score provided	Primarily qualitative (though ComplexMoGAPI adds scoring) [59]
Key Strengths	Specialized for sample preparation; software-supported calculation [8]	Holistic visual assessment; identifies specific improvement areas [59]
Limitations	Limited to sample preparation only	Lacks inherent scoring in standard version [59]

Experimental Protocols and Application Workflows

AGREEprep in Practice: Liquid-Phase Microextraction (LPME)

Methodology: Researchers systematically improved the greenness of a three-phase LPME method for analyzing basic drugs and metabolites in human plasma [60]. The protocol involved:

• Initial Setup: Extraction from 125 µL of human plasma diluted with 125 µL of 10 mM NaOH, through 3.0 µL of dihexyl ether as liquid membrane, into 50 µL of 20 mM HCOOH as acceptor [60].
• Chemical Substitution: Replacing NaOH, dihexyl ether, and HCOOH with more sustainable alternatives (NaHCO₃, sesame oil, and citric acid) [60].
• Equipment Recycling: Implementing vial-based LPME with recycling and washing of equipment in hot water to reduce material waste to less than 10 mg per sample [60].

AGREEprep Assessment Outcome: This systematic optimization progressively increased the AGREEprep score from 0.62 to 0.72, demonstrating how targeted modifications significantly improve environmental performance while maintaining analytical effectiveness [60].

ComplexGAPI Application: Micellar Chromatography

Methodology: A green, solvent-free mixed micellar chromatographic method was developed for concomitant determination of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride [61]. The protocol featured:

• Mobile Phase: Using 0.13 M sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.02 M Birij-35 solution adjusted to pH 2.5 with phosphoric acid, eliminating organic solvents entirely [61].
• Chromatographic Conditions: X-Bridge column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with UV detection at 280 nm, flow rate of 1.3 mL/min, and column temperature of 40°C [61].
• Quality by Design Approach: Implementing fractional factorial and Box-Behnken designs to screen and optimize critical method parameters while incorporating greenness as a key response variable [61].

ComplexGAPI Assessment: The method's complete elimination of organic solvents, minimal waste generation, and energy-efficient operation resulted in favorable ComplexGAPI pictograms, confirming its alignment with GAC principles [61].

Complementary Implementation Framework

The strategic combination of AGREEprep and ComplexGAPI creates a comprehensive assessment system that leverages their complementary strengths, as illustrated in the workflow below:

Implementation in Pharmaceutical Analysis

A recent study analyzing five COVID-19 antiviral drugs demonstrated the power of this multi-metric approach [54]. The developed RP-HPLC method utilized an isocratic mobile phase of water and methanol (30:70 v/v) with pH adjustment to 3.0 using 0.1% ortho-phosphoric acid [54]. When evaluated with both tools, the method achieved an AGREEprep score of 0.59 and favorable ComplexGAPI assessment, providing validation from complementary perspectives: AGREEprep confirmed the environmental acceptability of the sample preparation approach, while ComplexGAPI verified the sustainability of the overall analytical workflow [54].

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Category	Function/Purpose	Green Characteristics
Sesame Oil	Green alternative to dihexyl ether as liquid membrane in LPME [60]	Biodegradable, non-toxic, renewable resource
Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO₃)	Replacement for NaOH in sample preparation [60]	Less hazardous, lower environmental impact
Citric Acid	Alternative to formic acid as acceptor solution [60]	Biodegradable, low toxicity
Mixed Surfactant Systems (SDS + Birij-35)	Mobile phase for solvent-free micellar chromatography [61]	Eliminates organic solvent use
Methanol-Water Mobile Phases	Chromatographic elution with reduced toxicity [54]	Less hazardous than acetonitrile-based systems

The complementary use of AGREEprep and ComplexGAPI provides researchers with a powerful toolkit for developing and validating sustainable analytical methods. While AGREEprep offers specialized, quantitative assessment of sample preparation - often the most waste-intensive step - ComplexGAPI delivers holistic visual evaluation of the entire analytical procedure. Together, they enable comprehensive environmental profiling that drives innovation in green method development, from simple solvent substitutions to complete workflow redesigns. This multi-metric approach represents the future of sustainable analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to make informed decisions that reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical integrity.

The growing emphasis on environmental sustainability has made Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) a critical discipline, focusing on minimizing the environmental impact of analytical methods [20]. Evaluating this "greenness" requires robust, standardized metrics. Among these, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive, user-friendly tool that enables researchers to quantitatively assess and compare the environmental footprint of analytical procedures [20] [4].

AGREE, developed in 2020, is distinguished by its foundation on the 12 principles of GAC, which cover aspects such as reagent toxicity, energy consumption, waste generation, and operator safety [27]. Its open-source software generates an intuitive, circular pictogram that provides both an at-a-glance visual assessment and a quantitative score between 0 and 1, facilitating straightforward comparison between methods [20] [27]. This combination of comprehensive coverage and clear output makes AGREE particularly valuable for method selection and optimization in research and industrial settings, including pharmaceutical development where regulatory and societal pressures for sustainable practices are mounting [62] [63].

The AGREE Ecosystem: Tools and Methodologies

The AGREE Software and Calculation Basis

The AGREE metric tool evaluates analytical procedures against the 12 GAC principles, with each principle scored between 0 and 1. The software assigns weighted scores for each criterion, reflecting their relative environmental importance. The final composite score (0-1 scale) and a color-coded pictogram (red to green) provide an immediate visual representation of a method's overall greenness [27]. This output allows scientists to quickly identify the greenest available method and pinpoint specific aspects where existing methods can be made more sustainable [4].

Complementary Tools in the AGREE Family

The AGREE ecosystem has expanded to include specialized tools for different analytical stages:

• AGREEprep: The first dedicated metric for evaluating the environmental impact of sample preparation steps, based on the 10 principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP) [8]. Sample preparation is often a critical component for achieving analytical greenness, and this tool provides focused assessment on this impactful stage [27] [8].

• Other Emerging Metrics: Recent years have seen the development of additional complementary tools including AGREEprep, Modified GAPI (MoGAPI), Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), and Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA), which together provide a multidimensional view of method sustainability [20].

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Tools

AGREE Versus Other Assessment Metrics

Multiple greenness assessment tools exist, each with distinct advantages and limitations. The table below provides a comparative overview of major metrics:

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics for Analytical Methods

Metric	Basis of Assessment	Output Format	Key Advantages	Key Limitations
AGREE	12 principles of GAC	Pictogram + numerical score (0-1)	Comprehensive coverage, user-friendly, automated calculation [4] [27]	Some subjective weighting of criteria [20]
NEMI	4 basic environmental criteria	Binary pictogram	Simple, accessible [20]	Lacks granularity, doesn't assess full workflow [20] [4]
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty points for non-green attributes	Numerical score (0-100)	Facilitates direct method comparison [20] [4]	Relies on expert judgment, no visual component [20]
GAPI	Entire analytical process	5-part color-coded pictogram	Comprehensive, visually intuitive [20]	Complex, no overall score, somewhat subjective [20] [4]
AGREEprep	10 principles of GSP	Pictogram + numerical score (0-1)	Focuses on sample preparation, user-friendly [27] [8]	Must be used with broader tools for full method evaluation [20]

Performance and Reliability of Different Tools

Comparative studies demonstrate that AGREE offers several practical benefits over earlier metrics. In one study evaluating 16 chromatographic methods, NEMI proved least effective as it failed to differentiate between methods, with 14 of 16 methods displaying identical pictograms [4]. Both AGREE and the Analytical Eco-Scale provided reliable numerical assessments, but AGREE offered additional advantages through its automation capabilities and its ability to highlight specific weaknesses in analytical techniques that need greenness improvements [4].

AGREE and GAPI both provide fully descriptive, three-colored pictograms, but AGREE is noted for having merits of "simplicity and automation over GAPI" [4]. This combination of comprehensive assessment with user-friendly implementation makes AGREE particularly suitable for both expert and novice users in routine method evaluation and selection.

Case Study: AGREE in Method Selection for UV Filter Analysis

Experimental Background and Methodology

A recent study evaluated the greenness of 10 chromatographic methods for determining UV filters in cosmetic products, using both AGREE and AGREEprep tools [27]. The methods represented various analytical approaches, including:

• European standard method (Method 1) [27]
• Solvent extraction with derivatization (Method 3) [27]
• Solid-phase extraction (SPE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) (Methods 4-5) [27]
• Five microextraction techniques: MEPS, µ-MSPD, DSPME, US-VA-DLLME, and dynamic HF-LPME-HPLC-UV (Methods 6-10) [27]

The evaluation assessed each method against the 12 GAC principles in AGREE and the 10 GSP principles in AGREEprep, with particular attention to solvent consumption, energy requirements, waste generation, and operator safety [27].

Results and Comparative Analysis

The assessment revealed significant differences in greenness performance between method categories:

Table 2: Greenness Scores of UV Filter Analytical Methods Using AGREE and AGREEprep [27]

Method Number	Analytical Technique	Sample Preparation Method	AGREE Score	AGREEprep Score	Key Greenness Findings
1	Liquid chromatography	Solvent dissolution	Information missing	0.33	Standard method with moderate greenness
2	Liquid chromatography	Solvent dissolution	Information missing	Information missing	Information missing
3	Gas chromatography	Solvent extraction with derivatization	Information missing	Information missing	Derivatization harmful to environment and operator health
4	Chromatography	SPE	Information missing	Information missing	Information missing
5	Chromatography	PLE	Information missing	Information missing	Information missing
6-10	Chromatography	Microextraction techniques	Higher scores	Higher scores	Microextraction methods showed higher greenness [27]

The study concluded that "microextraction methods of sample preparation in the AGREEprep assessment show a higher score of greenness" compared to conventional techniques [27]. This demonstrates how AGREE metrics can guide analysts toward more sustainable method choices while maintaining analytical validity.

Implementation Framework for AGREE in Method Development

Step-by-Step AGREE Evaluation Process

Implementing AGREE in method selection follows a systematic workflow:

This workflow enables researchers to systematically evaluate and compare methods, identifying specific areas for greenness improvement. The AGREE software is freely available, enhancing accessibility for diverse laboratory settings [27].

Key Reagents and Solutions for Green Analytical Methods

Implementing greener analytical methods often requires specific reagents and materials:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function in Green Analysis	Greenness Benefit
Bio-based solvents	Replacement for petroleum-derived solvents	Reduced toxicity, renewable sourcing [20]
Miniaturized extraction devices	Sample preparation and analyte isolation	Reduced solvent consumption [27]
Renewable sorbents	Extraction and purification	Biodegradability, reduced waste [20]
Low-toxicity derivatization agents	Analyte modification for detection	Enhanced operator safety [27]

The AGREE metric system provides a robust, comprehensive framework for evaluating and comparing the environmental impact of analytical methods. Through its quantitative scoring system and intuitive visual output, it enables researchers to make informed decisions that align with sustainability goals without compromising analytical quality. As demonstrated in case studies across pharmaceutical and environmental analysis, AGREE effectively differentiates between conventional and greener alternatives, with microextraction techniques consistently showing superior environmental profiles [27].

The ongoing development of complementary tools like AGREEprep, along with the establishment of the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute in collaboration with industry partners, indicates a growing commitment to standardized sustainability assessment in analytical science [63]. For researchers and drug development professionals, incorporating AGREE into method validation protocols represents a critical step toward reducing the ecological footprint of analytical operations while maintaining scientific rigor and compliance with increasingly stringent environmental regulations.

In the modern pharmaceutical industry, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting has evolved from a voluntary initiative to a critical component of corporate integrity and business success [64]. Stakeholders, including investors and the public, increasingly demand accountability and transparent sustainability narratives from business executives [65]. Within this context, analytical laboratories—essential for quality control and drug development—face growing pressure to quantify and minimize their environmental impact while maintaining rigorous analytical standards.

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive tool to address this dual challenge, enabling scientists to systematically evaluate and improve the environmental profile of their analytical methods. This comparison guide examines AGREE's role within the broader ecosystem of green assessment tools and its specific applications in supporting regulatory compliance and sustainability reporting frameworks in the pharmaceutical industry.

The Evolution of Green Analytical Chemistry Metrics

From Basic Checklists to Comprehensive Assessment

The field of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has progressed significantly from its early tools to more sophisticated assessment systems. The timeline below illustrates key milestones in the development of greenness assessment metrics.

The National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) represented an early approach with a simple pictogram indicating whether a method met four basic environmental criteria [20]. While user-friendly, its binary structure limited its ability to distinguish degrees of greenness [20]. This was followed by more quantitative tools like the Analytical Eco-Scale, which applied penalty points to non-green attributes subtracted from a base score of 100 [20].

The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) introduced a more comprehensive, color-coded pictogram assessing the entire analytical process from sample collection to detection [20]. However, it lacked an overall numerical score, making direct method comparisons challenging.

The AGREE Framework: A Quantitative Leap Forward

AGREE addressed several limitations of previous metrics by incorporating the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry into a unified scoring system [9]. The tool calculates a final score from 0 to 1 and presents results in an easily interpretable circular pictogram that shows performance across multiple criteria [9]. This comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward approach provides both visual and quantitative outputs that facilitate direct comparison between methods [9] [20].

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Metrics

Technical Specifications and Scoring Methodologies

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics

Metric	Assessment Scope	Scoring System	Visual Output	Key Strengths	Key Limitations
AGREE	Entire analytical procedure	0-1 scale based on 12 GAC principles	Circular pictogram with sections	Comprehensive, quantitative score, user-friendly software	Subjective weighting, limited pre-analytical coverage
NEMI	Basic environmental criteria	Binary (pass/fail 4 criteria)	Simple square pictogram	Extreme simplicity, accessibility	Lacks granularity, limited criteria
Analytical Eco-Scale	Non-green attributes	Penalty points from base of 100	Numerical score only	Quantitative comparison	No visual component, relies on expert judgment
GAPI	Entire analytical process	Qualitative color coding	Five-part color pictogram	Comprehensive workflow coverage	No overall score, somewhat subjective
AGREEprep	Sample preparation only	0-1 scale	Circular pictogram	Focuses on impactful sample prep	Must be combined with other tools for full method
BAGI	Practicality & economical aspects	25-100 scale based on 10 criteria	Blue star diagram	Assesses practical implementation	Does not cover environmental aspects
RAPI	Analytical performance	0-100 scale based on 10 criteria	Red star diagram	Comprehensive validation assessment	No environmental considerations

The AGREE Software and Assessment Protocol

The AGREE assessment is supported by open-source, accessible software that standardizes the evaluation process [9]. The methodology follows a structured protocol:

• Data Collection: Compile information on all aspects of the analytical method, including reagents, energy consumption, waste generation, and procedural steps
• Criteria Evaluation: Assess the method against the 12 principles of GAC, which cover factors such as toxicity of reagents, waste generation, energy requirements, and operator safety [9]
• Weight Assignment: Assign relative importance to different criteria based on methodological priorities (default weights are available)
• Score Calculation: The software computes the overall score and generates the pictogram
• Interpretation: Results are visualized in a circular diagram where green intensity indicates performance in each criterion, with the final numerical score displayed at the center

AGREE in Pharmaceutical Applications: Case Studies and Experimental Data

Sustainability-Driven Method Optimization

In a recent pharmaceutical application, researchers developed and optimized an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method for simultaneous analysis of casirivimab and imdevimab using Quality by Design principles guided by AGREE assessment [66]. The methodology incorporated green chemistry principles throughout development, including:

• Solvent selection: Ethanol was chosen as the organic solvent due to its cost-effectiveness and greener profile compared to traditional alternatives [66]
• Systematic optimization: Employed Taguchi orthogonal array design to assess influence of factors like flow rate, column temperature, and organic phase percentage [66]
• Green validation: The method was validated for linearity (R² > 0.999), sensitivity, and reproducibility while maintaining environmental considerations [66]

The resulting method achieved optimal conditions at 60% ethanol, flow rate of 0.2 mL/min, and column temperature of 30°C, demonstrating that rigorous analytical performance can be maintained while improving environmental metrics [66].

ESG Reporting and Compliance Applications

Pharmaceutical companies are implementing investor-grade ESG reporting with the same rigor as financial reporting systems [65]. AGREE supports these initiatives by providing:

• Standardized environmental impact data for analytical operations
• Quantitative metrics for inclusion in sustainability reports
• Documented green chemistry implementation for regulatory submissions

One global pharmaceutical leader has made transparent, consistent ESG reporting a cornerstone of its corporate strategy, viewing it as an opportunity to "deliver on a better tomorrow for its people and for society" while building trust with stakeholders [65]. The company integrated controls and data governance structures for sustainability metrics, enabling the collection of reliable environmental performance data [65].

Complementary Metric Tools for Holistic Method Assessment

The White Analytical Chemistry Framework

The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept provides a comprehensive framework that expands beyond environmental considerations alone [14]. Inspired by the RGB color model where white light results from combining red, green, and blue, WAC assesses methods across three dimensions:

• Green component: Environmental impact, assessed by tools like AGREE
• Red component: Analytical performance, assessed by the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI)
• Blue component: Practicality and economical aspects, assessed by the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) [14]

This triadic approach acknowledges that truly optimal methods must balance environmental sustainability with analytical quality and practical implementation [14].

Integrated Assessment Using Multiple Metrics

Table 2: Multi-Metric Assessment of Analytical Methods for Comprehensive Evaluation

Assessment Dimension	Primary Metric	Key Assessment Criteria	Pharmaceutical Application Considerations
Environmental Impact	AGREE	12 principles of GAC, including toxicity, waste, energy	Regulatory compliance, ESG reporting, corporate sustainability goals
Analytical Performance	RAPI	10 validation parameters including precision, accuracy, sensitivity, linearity	Method validation requirements, regulatory submission data quality
Practicality & Economics	BAGI	10 practicality criteria including cost, time, skill requirements	Implementation feasibility, training requirements, operational costs

A case study evaluating a sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME) method for determining antiviral compounds demonstrated the value of this multi-metric approach [20]. The method received an AGREE score of 56, reflecting a reasonably balanced green profile with strengths in miniaturization and semi-automation, but limitations in waste management and reagent safety [20]. This comprehensive assessment provides a more nuanced understanding than any single metric could offer.

Implementation in Regulatory and Quality Control Environments

The Scientist's Toolkit for Green Method Assessment

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Technology	Function in Analytical Methods	Green Attributes	Application Examples
Ethanol	Organic solvent in chromatography	Less toxic alternative to acetonitrile and methanol	UPLC analysis of monoclonal antibodies [66]
Miniaturized Equipment	Reduced sample and reagent volumes	Lower solvent consumption, less waste generation	Microextraction techniques [20]
Automation Systems	Reduced manual intervention	Higher throughput, improved reproducibility, safety	Sample preparation and analysis [20]
Biopolymers	Sustainable materials for devices	Reduced environmental footprint	Pre-filled syringes and medical devices [64]
Digital & AI Tools	Data management and optimization	Reduced resource consumption through predictive analytics	Clinical trial recruitment, dose optimization [64]

Method Comparison and Agreement Assessment

When implementing green analytical methods, statistical assessment of agreement with established methods is crucial for regulatory acceptance. The Bland-Altman method is the recommended statistical approach for comparing measurement techniques [67]. Key considerations include:

• Avoiding correlation coefficients for method agreement assessment, as correlation measures relationship strength rather than actual agreement [67]
• Calculating average bias to estimate systematic differences between methods [68]
• Graphical techniques such as difference-against-mean plots to visualize agreement and identify potential problems [67]

Proper method comparison ensures that new greener methods provide equivalent results to established techniques while demonstrating improved environmental performance through metrics like AGREE.

Future Directions and Strategic Implementation

Emerging Trends in Green Metric Development

The field of green assessment continues to evolve with several emerging trends:

• Carbon footprint integration: Newer tools like the Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI) specifically address climate impacts by estimating carbon emissions associated with analytical procedures [20]
• Lifecycle assessment: Expanding beyond immediate operational impacts to consider full lifecycle environmental effects of analytical methods
• Automation and AI: Leveraging technology to streamline green assessment and identify optimization opportunities [64]
• Regulatory alignment: Increasing harmonization between green chemistry principles and regulatory requirements for pharmaceutical analysis

Strategic Recommendations for Pharmaceutical Organizations

Based on current industry best practices, pharmaceutical companies should consider these strategic actions:

• Integrate green assessment early in method development rather than as a retrospective evaluation
• Adopt a multi-metric approach that balances environmental, performance, and practical considerations using AGREE, RAPI, and BAGI collectively
• Establish internal benchmarks for AGREE scores across different analytical applications to track improvement over time
• Incorporate green metrics into quality by design frameworks and method validation protocols
• Leverage AGREE data for ESG reporting and stakeholder communications on sustainability performance

The progression from basic checklist approaches to comprehensive, quantitative tools like AGREE demonstrates the analytical chemistry community's growing commitment to environmental responsibility. As regulatory expectations evolve and sustainability becomes increasingly integrated into corporate strategy, AGREE and complementary metrics provide the rigorous assessment framework needed to document and improve the environmental performance of pharmaceutical analysis while maintaining the high-quality standards required for drug development and quality control.

Conclusion

The AGREE metric represents a significant advancement in green analytical chemistry, providing researchers and pharmaceutical professionals with a comprehensive, quantitative tool for environmental impact assessment. By transforming the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry into an intuitive, visually accessible format with numerical scoring, AGREE enables informed decision-making in method development and selection. The comparative analyses demonstrate AGREE's superiority over earlier metrics in comprehensiveness and user-friendliness, while its flexible weighting system allows customization for specific analytical needs. As sustainability becomes increasingly integral to analytical science, AGREE offers a robust framework for driving innovation in green method development. Future directions should focus on expanding AGREE's application to emerging analytical technologies, integrating lifecycle assessment principles, and establishing standardized AGREE benchmarks for regulatory acceptance in pharmaceutical quality control and clinical research methodologies.

References

• 1. HPLC 2025 Preview: The Road To Sustainable Analytical ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/hplc-2025-preview-the-road-to-sustainable-analytical-chemistry]
• 2. Green metrics and green analytical applications [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000685]
• 3. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697060/]
• 4. Comparative study of four greenness assessment tools for ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/ay/d0ay02169e]
• 5. A Perspective on Current and Future Metric Tools - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12590457/]
• 6. Greenness assessment of analytical methods for ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39161240/]
• 7. A comparative greenness assessment of chromatographic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000211]
• 8. A Tutorial on AGREEprep an Analytical Greenness Metric ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582022000225]
• 9. AGREEAnalytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://acs.figshare.com/collections/AGREE_Analytical_GREEnness_Metric_Approach_and_Software/5045160]
• 10. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588019/]
• 11. Scientists Use Analytical GREEnness Metric to Test for ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/scientists-use-analytical-greenness-metric-to-test-for-antibiotics-in-food-samples]
• 12. A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039914018300195]
• 13. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177924001102]
• 14. Red analytical performance index (RAPI) and software [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d4gc05298f]
• 15. Application of NEMI, Analytical Eco-Scale and GAPI tools ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X19333454]
• 16. EcoScale, a semi-quantitative tool to select an organic ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1409775/]
• 17. Modified GAPI (MoGAPI) Tool and Software for the ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/5/3/30]
• 18. Complementary green analytical procedure index ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/gc/d1gc02318g]
• 19. AGREEprep – Analytical greenness metric for sample ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016599362200036X]
• 20. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/the-green-component-assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-analytical-methods]
• 21. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318332/]
• 22. Weighted Scoring Model: Step-by-Step Implementation ... [https://productschool.com/blog/product-fundamentals/weighted-scoring-model]
• 23. Weighted Scoring Prioritization : Make Informed Decisions [https://www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-in-focus/weighted-scoring-prioritization/]
• 24. Applying ICH Q14 in Pharmaceuticals Part 1 [https://premier-research.com/perspectives/applying-ich-q14-in-pharmaceuticals-part-1-the-application-of-analytical-target-profile-in-analytical-method-development/]
• 25. The Comparison of Methods Experiment [https://www.westgard.com/lessons/basic-method-validation/lesson23.html]
• 26. Utilisation of Analytical Method Greenness Score to drive ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/pt-br/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc01574j]
• 27. Comparison of the Greenness Assessment ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/4/4/32]
• 28. Development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for simultaneous... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12264094/]
• 29. QbD-driven RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous analysis of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12574138/]
• 30. Optimization and development of a green high performance liquid... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ay/d5ay00506j]
• 31. Innovative spectrophotometric methods for the analysis of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-25067-4]
• 32. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209517792500019X]
• 33. Drug Development Testing Services Decade Long Trends ... [https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/drug-development-testing-services-139523]
• 34. Top 5 Drug Discovery Trends 2025 Driving Breakthroughs [https://www.pelagobio.com/cetsa-drug-discovery-resources/blog/drug-discovery-trends-2025/]
• 35. Understanding Data Gaps in Research [https://researchmate.net/understanding-data-gaps-in-research/]
• 36. Reporting, analysis, reproducibility, and replicability [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953618302806]
• 37. Greenness assessment and comparison of the developed ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X24013237]
• 38. Weighting and valuation in selected environmental ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652610001678]
• 39. Comparative statistical evaluation of greenness, blueness ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-96091-7]
• 40. Comparative study of four greenness assessment tools for ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33404016/]
• 41. Enviroscore: normalization, weighting, and categorization ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9700787/]
• 42. Analysis of Environmental Sustainability through a ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9063]
• 43. Analytical greenness metrics for metabolomics [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40830591/]
• 44. Emerging Tools for Holistic Evaluation of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/emerging-tools-for-holistic-evaluation-of-analytical-methods]
• 45. 4 Benefits of Automation in Electronics Manufacturing [https://svtronics.com/the-benefits-of-automation-in-electronics-manufacturing/?srsltid=AfmBOoq4VsqnIqdGmQObX2R9PBrB1qXcwuUP2l22EESwbY6Ze5NWA8-s]
• 46. How to Reduce Waste: 21 Ideas for Zero Waste Living [https://onetreeplanted.org/blogs/stories/how-to-reduce-waste?srsltid=AfmBOorzjNyjpyU8zJwZfLgjdlS_1dlnwSjJbwR_FRf9b5HGWZjjKvYw]
• 47. 40 Ways to Be More Eco Friendly in 2025 [https://www.greenmatch.co.uk/blog/how-to-be-more-eco-friendly]
• 48. 6 Smart Waste Management Technologies Emerging in 2025 [https://www.rts.com/blog/smart-waste-management-technologies/]
• 49. Tools to Evaluate the Eco-efficiency of Analytical Methods ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37877508/]
• 50. Analytical Eco-Scale for assessing the greenness of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993612001525]
• 51. assessment using GAPI, AGREE and analytical Eco-scale ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X22010906]
• 52. Greenness assessment of analytical methods for ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/ay/d4ay01083c]
• 53. Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) as a new tool to assess ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352554125001494]
• 54. Development and validation of a RP-HPLC method for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-09904-0]
• 55. Evaluation of analytical greenness metric for an eco-friendly ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365310/]
• 56. Critical review on the assessments of green metric tools for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772391725000404]
• 57. Violet Innovation Grade Index (VIGI): A New Survey-Based ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131222/]
• 58. Green metric tools and white assessment in bioanalytical ... [https://zenodo.org/records/17385350]
• 59. A total scoring system and software for complex modified ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000351]
• 60. Liquid-phase microextraction in bioanalysis – How green ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577422000271]
• 61. Design of experiment-oriented development of solvent-free ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-44498-5]
• 62. Greenness assessment of 174 CEN, ISO, and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000336]
• 63. Utilisation of Analytical Method Greenness Score to drive ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc01574j]
• 64. Reaching ESG goals in pharmaceutical development [https://www.gabionline.net/biosimilars/research/reaching-esg-goals-in-pharmaceutical-development]
• 65. Taking a bold lead on ESG reporting in the pharma industry [https://www.pwc.com/us/en/library/case-studies/esg-reporting-pharma.html]
• 66. Development of a quality by design-based ultra ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425000448]
• 67. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two ... [https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/meas/ba.htm]
• 68. Method comparison / Agreement [https://analyse-it.com/docs/user-guide/method-comparison/method-comparison]